Jairam Vikram, Park Henry S
Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019 Sep;8(Suppl 2):S172-S183. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.05.06.
There has been a substantial rise in the utilization of large databases in radiation oncology research. The advantages of these datasets include a large sample size and inclusion of a diverse population of patients in a real-world setting. Such observational studies hold promise in enhancing our understanding of questions for which evidence is conflicting or absent in lung cancer radiotherapy. However, it is critical that investigators understand the strengths and limitations of large databases in order to avoid the common pitfalls that beset observational analyses. This review begins by outlining the data variables available in major registries that are used most often in observational analyses. This is followed by a discussion of the type of radiotherapy-related questions that can be addressed using such datasets, accompanied by examples from the lung cancer literature. Finally, we describe some limitations of observational research and techniques to mitigate bias and confounding. We hope that clinicians and researchers find this review helpful for designing new research studies and interpreting published analyses in the literature.
在放射肿瘤学研究中,大型数据库的使用显著增加。这些数据集的优势包括样本量大,且纳入了现实环境中不同类型的患者群体。此类观察性研究有望增进我们对肺癌放疗中证据相互矛盾或缺乏的问题的理解。然而,研究人员必须了解大型数据库的优势和局限性,以避免困扰观察性分析的常见陷阱。本综述首先概述了观察性分析中最常用的主要登记处可用的数据变量。接着讨论了使用此类数据集可以解决的放疗相关问题类型,并列举了肺癌文献中的实例。最后,我们描述了观察性研究的一些局限性以及减轻偏倚和混杂的技术。我们希望临床医生和研究人员发现本综述有助于设计新的研究以及解释文献中已发表的分析。