Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jan;24(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03089-3. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
The purpose of this review was to provide a novel perspective utilizing an assessment of biomarkers to evaluate the impact of stress-related disorders on the progression of periodontal disease and evaluate the growing body of evidence of stress as a risk indicator for periodontal disease progression.
Cross-sectional, case-control, and biomarker studies associating psychological disorders and periodontal disease were included in the literature search. Computational studies, animal studies, reviews, and studies lacking healthy controls were excluded. Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers in several databases as well as a manual search for relevant articles published up to January 2018.
Twenty-six articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Relationships between stress-related disorders and serum and salivary biomarkers such as cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), chromogranin A (CgA), and pro-inflammatory cytokines were identified.
The use of salivary pro-inflammatory cytokines alone is not sufficient for the identification of periodontal disease severity/progression with or without the presence of stress-associated diseases. Keeping in mind the limitations of this review, a positive qualitative correlation was observed in the literature among stress-related biomarkers and the severity of periodontal disease. This correlation may serve as an important reporter of patient susceptibility for periodontal breakdown in the future.
Stress-related disorders should be included in the list of globally screened diseases because it can change the biochemistry of both the local periodontal microenvironment as well as the global systemic inflammatory burden.
本综述旨在提供一个新视角,通过评估生物标志物来评估应激相关障碍对牙周病进展的影响,并评估应激作为牙周病进展风险指标的不断增加的证据。
对与心理障碍和牙周病相关的横断面、病例对照和生物标志物研究进行了文献检索。排除了计算研究、动物研究、综述以及缺乏健康对照的研究。两位独立评审员在多个数据库中进行了电子和手动文献搜索,并对截至 2018 年 1 月发表的相关文章进行了手动搜索。
26 篇文章符合纳入标准,并纳入了定性综合分析。确定了应激相关障碍与血清和唾液生物标志物(如皮质醇、脱氢表雄酮(DHEA)、嗜铬粒蛋白 A(CgA)和促炎细胞因子)之间的关系。
单独使用唾液促炎细胞因子不足以识别是否存在与应激相关疾病的牙周病严重程度/进展。考虑到本综述的局限性,文献中观察到应激相关生物标志物与牙周病严重程度之间存在阳性定性相关性。这种相关性将来可能成为牙周破坏患者易感性的重要指标。
应激相关障碍应列入全球筛查疾病的清单,因为它可以改变局部牙周微环境的生物化学和全身炎症负担。