Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China; Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital East Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Mar;29(3):e75-e86. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
Elbow stiffness commonly causes functional impairment and upper-limb disability. This study aimed to develop a new pathologic classification to further understand and standardize elbow arthrolysis from a new perspective, as well as to determine clinical outcomes.
Extension-flexion dysfunction was classified into 4 types: EF, tethers alone; EF, tethers with blocks; EF, articular malformation; and EF, bony ankylosis. Forearm rotation dysfunction was classified into 3 types: FR, contracture alone; FR, radial head malunion or nonunion; and FR, proximal radioulnar bony ankylosis. A total of 216 patients with elbow stiffness were prospectively included and categorized preoperatively. All surgical procedures were performed by the same chief surgeon; different types underwent specific procedures. Patient data, elbow motion, and functional scores were analyzed.
Mean range of motion (ROM) increased from 40° preoperatively to 118° at final follow-up; 88% of patients regained ROM of 100° or greater. The forearm rotation arc (FRA) with forearm rotation dysfunction increased from a preoperative mean of 76° to 128°; 82% of patients regained an FRA of 100° or greater. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) increased from 63 to 91 points; the proportion of patients with good or excellent results was 95%. EF patients had the best ROM (129°) and MEPI (93 points) and EF patients achieved the most-changed ROM (116°), whereas EF patients had the worst ROM (104°) and MEPI (84 points) and the least-changed ROM (64°). The FRA was best in FR patients (142°), followed by FR patients (118°), and worst in FR patients (82°); in contrast, the changed FRA was greatest in FR patients (82°), followed by FR patients (64°), and least in FR patients (37°).
This study suggests that the proposed pathologic classification provides a new perspective on the understanding and standardization of elbow arthrolysis, providing satisfactory clinical outcomes.
肘部僵硬通常会导致功能障碍和上肢残疾。本研究旨在开发一种新的病理分类方法,从新的视角进一步理解和规范肘部松解术,并确定其临床结果。
将屈伸功能障碍分为 4 型:EF,仅存在牵引;EF,存在牵引和阻挡;EF,关节畸形;EF,骨性强直。前臂旋转功能障碍分为 3 型:FR,单纯挛缩;FR,桡骨头畸形愈合或不愈合;FR,近段尺桡骨骨性强直。前瞻性纳入 216 例肘部僵硬患者,术前进行分类。所有手术均由同一位主刀医师完成;不同类型采用不同的手术方式。分析患者资料、肘部活动度和功能评分。
平均活动度(ROM)从术前的 40°增加到末次随访时的 118°;88%的患者 ROM 恢复到 100°或以上。伴前臂旋转功能障碍的前臂旋转弧(FRA)从术前平均 76°增加到 128°;82%的患者 FRA 恢复到 100°或以上。平均 Mayo 肘部功能评分(MEPI)从 63 分增加到 91 分;95%的患者获得良好或优秀的结果。EF 患者的 ROM(129°)和 MEPI(93 分)最佳,EF 患者的 ROM 改变最大(116°),EF 患者的 ROM 最差(104°)和 MEPI(84 分)最低,ROM 改变最小(64°)。FR 患者的 FRA 最好(142°),其次是 FR 患者(118°),FR 患者最差(82°);相比之下,FR 患者的 FRA 改变最大(82°),FR 患者(64°)次之,FR 患者(37°)最小。
本研究表明,所提出的病理分类为理解和规范肘部松解术提供了一个新视角,获得了满意的临床效果。