Suppr超能文献

一种新的基于 216 例患者经验的肘部僵硬病理分类。

A new pathologic classification for elbow stiffness based on our experience in 216 patients.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China; Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital East Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Mar;29(3):e75-e86. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Elbow stiffness commonly causes functional impairment and upper-limb disability. This study aimed to develop a new pathologic classification to further understand and standardize elbow arthrolysis from a new perspective, as well as to determine clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Extension-flexion dysfunction was classified into 4 types: EF, tethers alone; EF, tethers with blocks; EF, articular malformation; and EF, bony ankylosis. Forearm rotation dysfunction was classified into 3 types: FR, contracture alone; FR, radial head malunion or nonunion; and FR, proximal radioulnar bony ankylosis. A total of 216 patients with elbow stiffness were prospectively included and categorized preoperatively. All surgical procedures were performed by the same chief surgeon; different types underwent specific procedures. Patient data, elbow motion, and functional scores were analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean range of motion (ROM) increased from 40° preoperatively to 118° at final follow-up; 88% of patients regained ROM of 100° or greater. The forearm rotation arc (FRA) with forearm rotation dysfunction increased from a preoperative mean of 76° to 128°; 82% of patients regained an FRA of 100° or greater. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) increased from 63 to 91 points; the proportion of patients with good or excellent results was 95%. EF patients had the best ROM (129°) and MEPI (93 points) and EF patients achieved the most-changed ROM (116°), whereas EF patients had the worst ROM (104°) and MEPI (84 points) and the least-changed ROM (64°). The FRA was best in FR patients (142°), followed by FR patients (118°), and worst in FR patients (82°); in contrast, the changed FRA was greatest in FR patients (82°), followed by FR patients (64°), and least in FR patients (37°).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the proposed pathologic classification provides a new perspective on the understanding and standardization of elbow arthrolysis, providing satisfactory clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

肘部僵硬通常会导致功能障碍和上肢残疾。本研究旨在开发一种新的病理分类方法,从新的视角进一步理解和规范肘部松解术,并确定其临床结果。

方法

将屈伸功能障碍分为 4 型:EF,仅存在牵引;EF,存在牵引和阻挡;EF,关节畸形;EF,骨性强直。前臂旋转功能障碍分为 3 型:FR,单纯挛缩;FR,桡骨头畸形愈合或不愈合;FR,近段尺桡骨骨性强直。前瞻性纳入 216 例肘部僵硬患者,术前进行分类。所有手术均由同一位主刀医师完成;不同类型采用不同的手术方式。分析患者资料、肘部活动度和功能评分。

结果

平均活动度(ROM)从术前的 40°增加到末次随访时的 118°;88%的患者 ROM 恢复到 100°或以上。伴前臂旋转功能障碍的前臂旋转弧(FRA)从术前平均 76°增加到 128°;82%的患者 FRA 恢复到 100°或以上。平均 Mayo 肘部功能评分(MEPI)从 63 分增加到 91 分;95%的患者获得良好或优秀的结果。EF 患者的 ROM(129°)和 MEPI(93 分)最佳,EF 患者的 ROM 改变最大(116°),EF 患者的 ROM 最差(104°)和 MEPI(84 分)最低,ROM 改变最小(64°)。FR 患者的 FRA 最好(142°),其次是 FR 患者(118°),FR 患者最差(82°);相比之下,FR 患者的 FRA 改变最大(82°),FR 患者(64°)次之,FR 患者(37°)最小。

结论

本研究表明,所提出的病理分类为理解和规范肘部松解术提供了一个新视角,获得了满意的临床效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验