Liu Zeming, Chen Sichao, Huang Yihui, Hu Di, Wang Min, Wei Wei, Zhang Chao, Zeng Wen, Guo Liang
Department of Plastic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Department of Pediatrics, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI, United States.
Front Oncol. 2019 Oct 18;9:1093. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01093. eCollection 2019.
Since the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis (AJCC/TNM) cancer staging system introduced some significant changes, we investigated whether patients with stage T1-2N1M1 differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) should be placed in stage IVB, with the goal of providing suggestions for improved survival prediction. We divided 30,234 DTC patients aged ≥55 years enrolled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database into different stage groups based on the new stage system but in a more thorough manner. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to explore the clinicopathological factors associated with cancer-specific survival. Survival of different stage groups was assessed by mortality rates per 1,000 person-years, Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, and Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank tests and the propensity score matching method. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that age at diagnosis, T stage, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, histological types, extrathyroidal extension, and radiation therapy were associated with cancer-specific survival. Patients with stage T1-2N1M1 had a lower cancer-specific mortality rate per 1,000 person-years (28.081, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.616-62.505) and all-cause mortality rate per 1,000 person-years (70.203, 95% CI: 42.323-116.448) than those with low-level stages such as stage T4aN1M0, stage IVA, and stage T1-2N0M1. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses suggested that patients with stage T4bN1M0 belonging to stage IVA (hazard ratio: 2.529, 95% CI: 1.018-6.278, = 0.046) had a significantly higher risk of cancer-specific mortality than those with stage T1-2N1M1. Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank tests suggested that the cancer-specific survival curve of patients with stage T1-2N1M1 had a more modest decline than that of stage T4bN1M0 ( = 0.0125), and the cancer-specific survival curve and all-cause survival curve of patients with stage T1-2N1M1 were not different from those of stage T3N1M0, stage T4aN0M0, stage T4aN1M0, stage T4bN0M0, and stage T1-2N0M1 (all, > 0.05). The analysis yielded similar results after propensity score matching for other clinicopathological characteristics. Patients aged ≥55 years with stage T1-2N1M1 DTC according to the eighth edition AJCC/TNM cancer staging system should be downstaged and those with stage T4bN1M0 upstaged accordingly.
自美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)癌症分期系统第八版引入一些重大变化以来,我们研究了T1-2N1M1期分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者是否应归为IVB期,目的是为改善生存预测提供建议。我们将从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中纳入的30234例年龄≥55岁的DTC患者,根据新的分期系统以更全面的方式分为不同分期组。进行单因素和多因素Cox回归分析,以探索与癌症特异性生存相关的临床病理因素。通过每1000人年的死亡率、Cox比例风险回归分析以及采用对数秩检验和倾向评分匹配法的Kaplan-Meier分析来评估不同分期组的生存情况。单因素和多因素分析表明,诊断年龄、T分期、淋巴结转移、远处转移、组织学类型、甲状腺外侵犯和放疗与癌症特异性生存相关。T1-2N1M1期患者每1000人年的癌症特异性死亡率(28.081,95%置信区间[CI]:12.616 - 62.505)和全因死亡率(70.203,95%CI:42.323 - 116.448)低于T4aN1M0期、IVA期和T1-2N0M1期等低分期患者。Cox比例风险回归分析表明,属于IVA期的T4bN1M0期患者(风险比:2.529,95%CI:1.018 - 6.278,P = 0.046)的癌症特异性死亡风险显著高于T1-2N1M1期患者。采用对数秩检验的Kaplan-Meier分析表明,T1-2N1M1期患者的癌症特异性生存曲线下降幅度比T4bN1M0期患者更为平缓(P = 0.0125),且T1-2N1M1期患者的癌症特异性生存曲线和全因生存曲线与T3N1M0期、T4aN0M0期、T4aN1M0期、T4bN0M0期和T1-2N0M1期患者的生存曲线无差异(均P > 0.05)。在对其他临床病理特征进行倾向评分匹配后,分析得出了相似的结果。根据AJCC/TNM癌症分期系统第八版,年龄≥55岁的T1-2N1M1期DTC患者应下调分期,而T4bN1M0期患者应相应上调分期。