• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

商业特药保险计划所引用的证据一致性较差。

Little Consistency In Evidence Cited By Commercial Plans For Specialty Drug Coverage.

机构信息

James D. Chambers ( jchambers@tuftsmedicalcenter. org ) is an investigator in the Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, and an associate professor of medicine in the School of Medicine, Tufts University, both in Boston, Massachusetts.

Ari D. Panzer is a research assistant in the Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Nov;38(11):1882-1886. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00201.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00201
PMID:31682500
Abstract

We found wide variation in the evidence that US commercial health plans reported reviewing in their specialty drug coverage policies. There was little consistency in the numbers or types of studies cited by health plans. On average, only 15 percent of health plans' coverage policies cited the same study evaluating a specific drug for a specific indication.

摘要

我们发现,美国商业健康计划在其专科药物保险政策中报告审查的证据存在很大差异。健康计划引用的研究数量和类型几乎没有一致性。平均而言,只有 15%的健康计划的保险政策引用了评估特定药物用于特定适应症的相同研究。

相似文献

1
Little Consistency In Evidence Cited By Commercial Plans For Specialty Drug Coverage.商业特药保险计划所引用的证据一致性较差。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Nov;38(11):1882-1886. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00201.
2
Variation in health plan coverage of ESAs for anemia due to chronic kidney disease.由于慢性肾脏病导致的贫血症,各种健康计划对 ESA 的覆盖范围存在差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Sep;27(9):1221-1229. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.9.1221.
3
Limited role of patient input in specialty drug coverage policies.患者意见在专科药物保险政策中作用有限。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Aug;27(8):1067-1076. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.8.1067.
4
Examining US commercial health plans' use of The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review's reports in specialty drug coverage decisions.考察美国商业健康计划在专科药物覆盖决策中使用临床与经济评论学会报告的情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Mar;29(3):257-264. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.3.257.
5
What types of real-world evidence studies do U.S. commercial health plans cite in their specialty drug coverage decisions?美国商业健康计划在其专科药物覆盖决策中引用了哪些类型的真实世界证据研究?
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Oct;29(10):1307-1311. doi: 10.1002/pds.4992. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
6
Characterizing health plan evidence review practices.描述健康计划证据审查实践。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Sep;28(9):1053-1058. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.9.1053.
7
Management of Newer Antidepressant Medications in U.S. Commercial Health Plans.美国商业健康保险计划中新型抗抑郁药物的管理
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2015 Dec;18(4):165-73.
8
Specialty drug coverage varies between health plans' medical and pharmacy benefit policies.特殊药物的覆盖范围因健康计划的医疗和药品福利政策而异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Jun;29(6):607-613. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.6.607.
9
US commercial health plan coverage dynamics in pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies.美国商业健康计划在肺动脉高压治疗中的覆盖动态。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Jun;30(6):541-548. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.6.541.
10
Variation in US private health plans' coverage of orphan drugs.美国私人健康保险计划对罕见病药物覆盖范围的差异。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Oct;25(10):508-512.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of health technology assessments in specialty drug coverage decisions by US commercial health plans.美国商业健康保险计划在专科药物覆盖范围决策中对健康技术评估的使用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Mar;31(3):289-295. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.3.289.
2
US commercial health plan coverage dynamics in pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies.美国商业健康计划在肺动脉高压治疗中的覆盖动态。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Jun;30(6):541-548. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.6.541.
3
Comparison of prior authorization across insurers: cross sectional evidence from Medicare Advantage.
比较不同保险公司的预先授权:来自 Medicare Advantage 的横断面证据。
BMJ. 2024 Mar 7;384:e077797. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077797.
4
Examining US commercial health plans' use of The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review's reports in specialty drug coverage decisions.考察美国商业健康计划在专科药物覆盖决策中使用临床与经济评论学会报告的情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Mar;29(3):257-264. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.3.257.
5
Characterizing health plan evidence review practices.描述健康计划证据审查实践。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Sep;28(9):1053-1058. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.9.1053.
6
Coverage of New Drugs in Medicare Part D.医疗保险计划 D 中新药的覆盖范围。
Milbank Q. 2022 Jun;100(2):562-588. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12565. Epub 2022 May 3.
7
Patients' access to rare neuromuscular disease therapies varies across US private insurers.美国私人保险公司对罕见神经肌肉疾病治疗方法的患者可及性存在差异。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Feb 5;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02182-3.
8
Variation in health plan coverage of ESAs for anemia due to chronic kidney disease.由于慢性肾脏病导致的贫血症,各种健康计划对 ESA 的覆盖范围存在差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Sep;27(9):1221-1229. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.9.1221.
9
Online tools to synthesize real-world evidence of comparative effectiveness research to enhance formulary decision making.在线工具合成比较有效性研究的真实世界证据,以加强处方决策。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jan;27(1):95-104. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.1.095.
10
The use of real-world evidence in ICER's scoping process and clinical evidence assessments.在 ICER 的范围界定过程和临床证据评估中使用真实世界证据。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Dec;26(12):1590-1595. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.12.1590.