• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A community pharmacy-led intervention for opioid medication misuse: A small-scale randomized clinical trial.社区药房主导的阿片类药物滥用干预:一项小规模随机临床试验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Dec 1;205:107570. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107570. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
2
A community pharmacy intervention for opioid medication misuse: A pilot randomized clinical trial.社区药房干预阿片类药物滥用:一项试点随机临床试验。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2018 Jul-Aug;58(4):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.03.005.
3
Addressing opioid medication misuse at point of service in community pharmacy: A study protocol for an interdisciplinary behavioral health trial.在社区药房的服务点解决阿片类药物滥用问题:一项跨学科行为健康试验的研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 May;116:106759. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106759. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
4
Brief intervention medication therapy management: Establishment of an opioid misuse intervention model delivered in a community pharmacy.简短干预药物治疗管理:在社区药房中实施的阿片类药物滥用干预模式的建立。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2021 Feb 8;78(4):310-319. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa389.
5
Prescription opioid use: Patient characteristics and misuse in community pharmacy.处方阿片类药物的使用:社区药房中的患者特征与滥用情况
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2016 May-Jun;56(3):248-256.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
6
A pilot randomized clinical trial of an intervention to reduce overdose risk behaviors among emergency department patients at risk for prescription opioid overdose.一项针对有处方阿片类药物过量风险的急诊科患者进行干预以降低过量风险行为的试点随机临床试验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jun 1;163:40-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.03.018. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
7
Prescription Opioid Misuse Among Rural Community Pharmacy Patients: Pilot Study for Screening and Implications for Future Practice and Research.农村社区药房患者中处方阿片类药物的滥用:筛查的试点研究及对未来实践和研究的启示
J Pharm Pract. 2017 Oct;30(5):498-505. doi: 10.1177/0897190016656673. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
8
Impact of a community pharmacy-based medication therapy management program on clinical and humanistic outcomes in patients with uncontrolled diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.基于社区药房的药物治疗管理项目对血糖控制不佳的糖尿病患者临床和人文结局的影响:一项随机对照试验
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 1;14(1):17818. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65759-x.
9
Analysis of pharmacist-provided medication therapy management (MTM) services in community pharmacies over 7 years.社区药房7年期间药剂师提供的药物治疗管理(MTM)服务分析
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):18-31. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.1.18.
10
Screening Community Pharmacy Patients for Risk of Prescription Opioid Misuse.筛查社区药房患者处方阿片类药物滥用风险。
J Addict Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;9(5):411-6. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000148.

引用本文的文献

1
A Social History of Opioids' Crimedical Cycle.阿片类药物犯罪循环的社会史。
Addict Res Theory. 2024;32(6):446-454. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2023.2282528. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
2
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of screening and intervention for co-use of opioid medications and alcohol among community pharmacy patients.社区药房患者中阿片类药物与酒精共同使用的筛查及干预实施的障碍与促进因素
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Feb;169:209606. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209606. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
3
CTN-0138: adaptation, implementation, and cluster randomized trial of a Community Pharmacy-Based Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Opioid Risk Assessment Tool-a protocol paper.CTN-0138:基于社区药店的处方药物监测计划阿片类药物风险评估工具的改编、实施和整群随机试验 - 方案论文。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024 Nov 18;19(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13722-024-00514-1.
4
Combatting opioid misuse, overuse and abuse: a systematic review of pharmacists' services and outcomes.应对阿片类药物滥用、过度使用和误用:药师服务和结果的系统评价。
Pain Manag. 2024 Sep;14(9):519-529. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2024.2411930. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
5
Project Lifeline-II: Feasibility of Implementing Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.生命线项目二期:在宾夕法尼亚州阿勒格尼县实施筛查、简短干预及转介治疗(SBIRT)的可行性
Public Health Rep. 2024 Sep 28:333549241277416. doi: 10.1177/00333549241277416.
6
Patient and pharmacist perspectives on opioid misuse screening and brief interventions in community pharmacies.患者和药剂师对社区药店中阿片类药物滥用筛查和简短干预的看法。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024 Apr 8;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13722-024-00460-y.
7
Engaging community pharmacies in practice-based research: Lessons from opioid-focused research.让社区药房参与基于实践的研究:以阿片类药物为重点的研究经验。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Apr;20(4):457-462. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.01.008. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
8
Co-use of Opioid Medications and Alcohol Prevention Study (COAPS).阿片类药物和酒精联合使用预防研究(COAPS)。
Subst Abus. 2023 Jul;44(3):130-135. doi: 10.1177/08897077231191840. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
9
Organizational Readiness to Implement Community Pharmacy-Based Opioid Counseling and Naloxone Services: A Scoping Review of Current Practice Models and Opportunities.实施基于社区药房的阿片类药物咨询和纳洛酮服务的组织准备情况:当前实践模式与机遇的范围综述
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Jun 11;11(3):99. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11030099.
10
Addressing the Opioid Crisis-The Need for a Pain Management Intervention in Community Pharmacies in Canada: A Narrative Review.应对阿片类药物危机——加拿大社区药房进行疼痛管理干预的必要性:一项叙述性综述
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Apr 6;11(2):71. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11020071.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges and concerns of persistent opioid use in cancer patients.癌症患者持续使用阿片类药物的挑战和担忧。
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018 Jul;18(7):705-718. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1474103. Epub 2018 May 14.
2
Different ways to estimate treatment effects in randomised controlled trials.在随机对照试验中估计治疗效果的不同方法。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Mar 28;10:80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.03.008. eCollection 2018 Jun.
3
A community pharmacy intervention for opioid medication misuse: A pilot randomized clinical trial.社区药房干预阿片类药物滥用:一项试点随机临床试验。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2018 Jul-Aug;58(4):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.03.005.
4
The role of the pharmacist in the management of type 2 diabetes: current insights and future directions.药剂师在2型糖尿病管理中的作用:当前见解与未来方向
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2017 Jan 16;6:15-27. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S103783. eCollection 2017.
5
Implementation of smart technology to improve medication adherence in patients with cardiovascular disease: is it effective?应用智能技术提高心血管疾病患者的用药依从性:是否有效?
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 Feb;15(2):119-126. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1421456. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
6
Cancer survivorship and opioid prescribing rates: A population-based matched cohort study among individuals with and without a history of cancer.癌症幸存者与阿片类药物处方率:一项基于人群的匹配队列研究,对象为有和没有癌症病史的个体。
Cancer. 2017 Nov 1;123(21):4286-4293. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30839. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
7
The Link between Depression and Chronic Pain: Neural Mechanisms in the Brain.抑郁症与慢性疼痛之间的联系:大脑中的神经机制
Neural Plast. 2017;2017:9724371. doi: 10.1155/2017/9724371. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
8
Comparison of the Substance Use Brief Screen (SUBS) to the AUDIT-C and ASSIST for detecting unhealthy alcohol and drug use in a population of hospitalized smokers.比较物质使用简要筛查(SUBS)与 AUDIT-C 和 ASSIST 在住院吸烟者人群中检测不健康的酒精和药物使用情况。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Aug;79:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 31.
9
Opioid addiction and misuse in adult and adolescent patients with cancer.癌症成年和青少年患者中的阿片类药物成瘾及滥用问题
Intern Med J. 2017 Jun;47(6):632-636. doi: 10.1111/imj.13449.
10
The effects of pharmacist interventions on adult outpatients with cancer: A systematic review.药剂师干预对成年癌症门诊患者的影响:一项系统评价。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017 Aug;42(4):414-424. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12562. Epub 2017 May 27.

社区药房主导的阿片类药物滥用干预:一项小规模随机临床试验。

A community pharmacy-led intervention for opioid medication misuse: A small-scale randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

University of Utah, School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, 30 N 1900 E, Room 4C104, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, USA; University of Pittsburgh, School of Social Work 2117 Cathedral of Learning, 4200 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.

University of Pittsburgh, School of Social Work 2117 Cathedral of Learning, 4200 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Dec 1;205:107570. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107570. Epub 2019 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107570
PMID:31689641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6933550/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stemming the opioid epidemic requires testing novel interventions. Toward this goal, feasibility and acceptability of a Brief Motivational Intervention-Medication Therapy Management (BMI-MTM) intervention was examined along with its impact on medication misuse and concomitant health conditions.

METHODS

We conducted a two-group randomized trial in 2 community pharmacies. We screened patients for prescription opioid misuse at point-of-service using the Prescription Opioid Misuse Index. Participants were assigned to standard medication counseling (SMC) or SMC + BMI-MTM (referred to as BMI-MTM herein). BMI-MTM consists of a pharmacist-led medication counseling/brief motivational session and 8-weekly patient navigation sessions. Assessments were at baseline, 2-, and 3-months. Primary outcomes included feasibility, acceptability, and mitigation of opioid medication misuse. Secondary outcomes included pain and depression. Outcomes were analyzed with descriptive and multivariable statistics (intent-to-treat [ITT] and adjusted for number of sessions completed [NUMSESS]).

RESULTS

Thirty-two participants provided informed consent (74.4% consent rate; SMC n = 17, BMI-MTM n = 15; 3-month assessment retention ≥93%). Feasibility was demonstrated by all BMI-MTM recipients completing the pharmacist session and an average of 7 navigation sessions. BMI-MTM recipients indicated ≥4.2 (5 maximum) level of satisfaction with the pharmacist-led session, and 92.4% were satisfied with navigation sessions. Compared to SMC at 3-months, BMI-MTM recipients reported greater improvements in misuse (ITT: Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] = 0.13; 95% CI = 0.05, 0.35, p < 0.001.

NUMSESS

AOR = 0.05; 95% CI = 0.01, 0.25; p < 0.001), pain (ITT: В = 8.8, 95% CI=-0.95, 18.5, p = 0.08; NUMSESS: В = 14.0, 95% CI = 3.28, 24.8, p = 0.01), and depression (ITT: B= -0.44; 95% CI=-0.65, -0.22; p < 0.001.

NUMSESS

B= -0.64; 95% CI=-0.82, -0.46; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

BMI-MTM is a feasible misuse intervention associated with superior satisfaction and outcomes than SMC. Future research should test BMI-MTM in a large-scale, fully-powered trial.

摘要

背景

遏制阿片类药物泛滥需要检验新的干预措施。为此,我们研究了一种简短动机干预-药物治疗管理(BMI-MTM)干预措施的可行性和可接受性,以及其对药物滥用和伴随健康状况的影响。

方法

我们在 2 家社区药店进行了一项 2 组随机试验。我们在服务点使用处方阿片类药物滥用指数对患者进行处方阿片类药物滥用筛查。参与者被分配到标准药物咨询(SMC)或 SMC+BMI-MTM(以下简称 BMI-MTM)。BMI-MTM 包括药剂师主导的药物咨询/简短动机会议和 8 周的患者导航会议。评估在基线、2 个月和 3 个月时进行。主要结局包括可行性、可接受性和阿片类药物滥用的缓解。次要结局包括疼痛和抑郁。使用描述性和多变量统计(意向治疗[ITT]和按完成的会话数调整[NUMSESS])分析结果。

结果

32 名参与者提供了知情同意(74.4%的同意率;SMC n=17,BMI-MTM n=15;3 个月评估保留率≥93%)。所有接受 BMI-MTM 的患者都完成了药剂师的治疗和平均 7 次导航治疗,这证明了其可行性。BMI-MTM 接受者表示对药剂师主导的治疗至少有 4.2(最高 5 分)的满意度,92.4%的人对导航治疗感到满意。与 3 个月时的 SMC 相比,BMI-MTM 接受者报告在滥用方面有更大的改善(ITT:调整后的优势比[OR]为 0.13;95%置信区间[CI]为 0.05,0.35,p<0.001)。NUMSESS:OR 为 0.05;95%CI 为 0.01,0.25;p<0.001)、疼痛(ITT:B=8.8,95%CI=-0.95,18.5,p=0.08;NUMSESS:B=14.0,95%CI=3.28,24.8,p=0.01)和抑郁(ITT:B=-0.44;95%CI=-0.65,-0.22;p<0.001)。NUMSESS:B=-0.64;95%CI=-0.82,-0.46;p<0.001)。

结论

BMI-MTM 是一种可行的滥用干预措施,与 SMC 相比,其满意度和效果都更好。未来的研究应该在大规模、全面的试验中检验 BMI-MTM。