Murao Shuhei, Yamakawa Kazuma
Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka 558-8558, Japan.
J Clin Med. 2019 Nov 4;8(11):1869. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111869.
Many systematic reviews have been published regarding anticoagulant therapy in sepsis, among which there is substantial heterogeneity. This study aimed to provide an overview of existing systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials by using a comprehensive search method. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Of 895 records screened, 19 systematic reviews were included. The target agent was as follows: antithrombin ( = 4), recombinant thrombomodulin ( = 3), heparin ( = 3), recombinant activated protein C ( = 8), and all anticoagulants ( = 1). Antithrombin did not improve mortality in critically ill patients but indicated a beneficial effect in sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), although the certainty of evidence was judged as low. Recombinant thrombomodulin was associated with a trend in reduced mortality in sepsis with coagulopathy with no increased risk of bleeding, although the difference was not statistically significant and the required information size for any declarative judgement insufficient. Although three systematic reviews showed potential survival benefits of unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with sepsis, trials with low risk of bias were lacking, and the overall impact remains unclear. None of the meta-analyses of recombinant activated protein C showed beneficial effects in sepsis. In summary, a beneficial effect was not observed in overall sepsis in poorly characterized patient groups but was observed in sepsis-induced DIC or sepsis with coagulopathy in more specific patient groups. This umbrella review of anticoagulant therapy suggests that characteristics of the target populations resulted in heterogeneity among the systematic reviews.
关于脓毒症抗凝治疗,已发表了许多系统评价,其中存在很大的异质性。本研究旨在通过全面检索方法概述现有随机对照试验的系统评价。我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane系统评价数据库。在筛选的895条记录中,纳入了19项系统评价。目标药物如下:抗凝血酶(n = 4)、重组血栓调节蛋白(n = 3)、肝素(n = 3)、重组活化蛋白C(n = 8)以及所有抗凝药物(n = 1)。抗凝血酶并未改善重症患者的死亡率,但在脓毒症诱导的弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)中显示出有益作用,尽管证据的确定性被判定为低。重组血栓调节蛋白与凝血病脓毒症患者死亡率降低的趋势相关,且出血风险未增加,尽管差异无统计学意义,且进行任何声明性判断所需的信息量不足。虽然三项系统评价显示普通肝素和低分子肝素对脓毒症患者有潜在的生存益处,但缺乏低偏倚风险的试验,总体影响仍不明确。重组活化蛋白C的荟萃分析均未显示在脓毒症中有有益作用。总之,在特征不明确的患者群体的总体脓毒症中未观察到有益作用,但在更特定患者群体的脓毒症诱导的DIC或凝血病脓毒症中观察到了有益作用。这项抗凝治疗的伞状评价表明,目标人群的特征导致了系统评价之间的异质性。