AIMES - Center for the Advancement of Integrated Medical and Engineering Sciences at Karolinska Institutet and KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 May 31;22(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07474-4.
An increasing number of patients are being prescribed anticoagulants and platelet inhibitors (antithrombotic treatment). Basic research has suggested an association between antithrombotic treatment and bacteremia during kidney infection. Here, we investigated the association between antithrombotic treatment, bacteremia and acute kidney injury in patients with acute pyelonephritis.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a large university hospital in Sweden. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records for adult patients with acute pyelonephritis in 2016. The main outcome was bacteremia and secondary outcome acute kidney injury. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated through multiple logistic regression. Treatment with different groups of antithrombotic agents were compared to no antithrombotic treatment.
1814 patients with acute pyelonephritis were included, in whom bacteremia developed in 336 (18.5%). Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) at prophylactic doses was associated with a lower risk of bacteremia, compared to no antithrombotic treatment (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.7). Other antithrombotic treatments were not associated with a risk of bacteremia. Additionally, patients with prophylactic doses of LMWH had a lower risk of acute kidney injury (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.8).
We found no association between antithrombotic treatment and an increased risk of bacteremia during acute pyelonephritis. Conversely, patients with prophylactic doses of LMWH had a slightly reduced risk of bacteremia. LMWH at prophylactic doses was also associated with a lower risk of acute kidney injury. Our results suggest that it is safe to continue antithrombotic treatment during acute pyelonephritis, in regards to bacteremia and acute kidney injury risk.
越来越多的患者被开具抗凝药物和血小板抑制剂(抗血栓治疗)。基础研究表明,抗血栓治疗与肾感染期间的菌血症之间存在关联。在这里,我们研究了急性肾盂肾炎患者的抗血栓治疗、菌血症和急性肾损伤之间的关系。
在瑞典的一家大型大学医院进行了回顾性队列研究。从 2016 年电子病历中检索了急性肾盂肾炎成年患者的数据。主要结局是菌血症,次要结局是急性肾损伤。通过多变量逻辑回归估计比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。不同组抗血栓药物的治疗与无抗血栓治疗进行比较。
纳入了 1814 例急性肾盂肾炎患者,其中 336 例(18.5%)发生菌血症。与无抗血栓治疗相比,预防性低分子肝素(LMWH)剂量与菌血症风险降低相关(OR 0.5;95%CI 0.3-0.7)。其他抗血栓治疗与菌血症风险无关。此外,预防性 LMWH 剂量的患者急性肾损伤的风险较低(OR 0.5;95%CI 0.3-0.8)。
我们发现抗血栓治疗与急性肾盂肾炎期间菌血症风险增加之间没有关联。相反,预防性 LMWH 剂量的患者菌血症风险略有降低。预防性 LMWH 剂量也与急性肾损伤风险降低相关。我们的结果表明,在急性肾盂肾炎期间,继续进行抗血栓治疗在菌血症和急性肾损伤风险方面是安全的。