Suppr超能文献

探究特定语言障碍儿童词汇-形态网络:对形态产出任务中反应的分析。

Toward Understanding the Lexical-Morphological Networks of Children With Specific Language Impairment: Analysis of Responses on a Morphological Production Task.

机构信息

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Nov 22;62(11):4131-4136. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0302. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to characterize the lexical-morphological networks of children with specific language impairment (SLI) compared to children with typical language by analyzing responses on a morphological derived form production task. Method School-age children with SLI ( = 32) and peers with typical language ( = 40) completed an oral cloze derived form production task (Carlisle, 2000). On this task, children were expected to complete verbally presented sentences with a derived form of a provided morphological stem. Responses were coded as correct or incorrect following Carlisle's (2000) stated correct responses. Incorrect responses were coded as scorable or unscorable, and then scorable responses were coded as pseudowords or real words. Real words were further coded according to whether they were repetitions of the given stem. Results There was a statistically significant between-group difference for mean correct responses ( = 1.43). The scorable incorrect responses of children with SLI included a lower mean proportion of pseudowords than did the incorrect responses of children with typical language ( = 0.76). Conclusion Because children with SLI produced a lower proportion of pseudowords as scorable incorrect responses than peers with typical language, we conclude that they have less developed lexical-morphological networks and, thus, less derivational morphology knowledge than peers with typical language.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在通过分析形态衍生形式生成任务中的反应,描述特定语言障碍(SLI)儿童与典型语言儿童的词汇形态网络。 方法 学龄期 SLI 儿童(n=32)和具有典型语言的同龄人(n=40)完成了口头 cloze 衍生形式生成任务(Carlisle,2000)。在这个任务中,孩子们需要用提供的形态词干的衍生形式来完成口头呈现的句子。根据 Carlisle(2000)规定的正确答案,对回答进行正确或错误的编码。错误的答案被编码为可评分或不可评分,然后可评分的答案被编码为假词或实词。实词进一步根据它们是否是给定词干的重复进行编码。 结果 组间平均正确反应存在统计学显著差异(M=1.43)。与典型语言儿童的错误反应相比,SLI 儿童的可评分错误反应中假词的平均比例较低(M=0.76)。 结论 由于 SLI 儿童产生的可评分错误反应中的假词比例低于具有典型语言的同龄人,因此我们得出结论,他们的词汇形态网络发育程度较低,因此与具有典型语言的同龄人相比,他们的衍生形态知识较少。

相似文献

2
Effects of input rate and age on the real-time language processing of children with specific language impairment.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2005 Apr-Jun;40(2):171-88. doi: 10.1080/13682820400011069.
3
Novel-word learning deficits in Mandarin-speaking preschool children with specific language impairments.
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Jan;35(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
4
Real-time language processing in school-age children with specific language impairment.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2006 May-Jun;41(3):275-91. doi: 10.1080/13682820500227987.
7
Measuring children's lexical diversity: differentiating typical and impaired language learners.
J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Dec;38(6):1349-55. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3806.1349.
8
Linguistic Contributions to Word-Level Spelling Accuracy in Elementary School Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 May 27;28(2):599-611. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-18-0064. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
9
What can errors tell us about specific language impairment deficits? Semantic and morphological cuing in a sentence completion task.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2015;29(11):812-25. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2015.1051239. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
10
Do Children Classified With Specific Language Impairment Have a Learning Disability in Writing? A Meta-Analysis.
J Learn Disabil. 2020 Jul/Aug;53(4):292-310. doi: 10.1177/0022219420917338. Epub 2020 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the Dimensionality of Morphological Knowledge for Adolescent Readers.
J Res Read. 2017 Feb;40(1):91-117. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12064. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
2
Morphological awareness assessment and intervention to improve language and literacy.
Semin Speech Lang. 2015 Feb;36(1):31-41. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396444. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
3
Morphological knowledge and literacy acquisition.
J Learn Disabil. 2014 Jan-Feb;47(1):3-12. doi: 10.1177/0022219413509967. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
4
A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties.
Ann Dyslexia. 2010 Dec;60(2):183-208. doi: 10.1007/s11881-010-0041-x. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
5
Lexical-semantic organization in children with specific language impairment.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Feb;53(1):146-59. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0160).
6
Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2010 Apr;39(2):141-63. doi: 10.1007/s10936-009-9130-6.
7
The influence of morphological awareness on the literacy development of first-grade children.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2009 Jul;40(3):286-98. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0001).
8
Derivational morphology in children with grammatical-specific language impairment.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2007 Feb;21(2):71-91. doi: 10.1080/02699200600594491.
9
A longitudinal investigation of reading outcomes in children with language impairments.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Dec;45(6):1142-57. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/093).
10
Morphological analysis by child readers as revealed by the fragment completion task.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Sep;9(3):529-35. doi: 10.3758/bf03196309.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验