Watkins R V, Kelly D J, Harbers H M, Hollis W
Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.
J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Dec;38(6):1349-55. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3806.1349.
This study evaluated the extent to which measures of lexical diversity (type-token ratio and number of different words produced) differentiated children with specific language impairment (SLI) from children whose language skills were following typical developmental expectations. Analysis of 50- and 100-utterance samples revealed that children with SLI did not significantly differ from their age- and language-equivalent peers on type-token ratio; however, children with SLI did use significantly fewer different words than their age-equivalent peers in these samples. When samples of 100 and 200 tokens were considered, the children with SLI also used significantly fewer different words than their age-equivalent counterparts. Overall, the findings of this study discourage the use of type-token ratio, as traditionally calculated, in many clinical and research activities related to children with SLI. In contrast, the number of different words produced provides a more sensitive and informative estimate of lexical diversity.
本研究评估了词汇多样性指标(类型- token比率和产出的不同单词数量)在区分特定语言障碍(SLI)儿童与语言技能符合典型发育预期的儿童方面的程度。对50个和10 utterance样本的分析表明,SLI儿童在类型- token比率上与年龄和语言相当的同龄人没有显著差异;然而,在这些样本中,SLI儿童使用的不同单词数量明显少于年龄相当的同龄人。当考虑100个和200个token的样本时,SLI儿童使用的不同单词数量也明显少于年龄相当的同龄人。总体而言,本研究结果不鼓励在许多与SLI儿童相关的临床和研究活动中使用传统计算的类型- token比率。相比之下,产出的不同单词数量提供了对词汇多样性更敏感和更具信息性的估计。