Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences/Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences/Geriatrics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ups J Med Sci. 2019 Nov;124(4):265-272. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2019.1680583. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
Fasting insulin resistance indexes are used extensively nowadays. We intended to analyze a new recently presented fasting index, SPISE (sensitivity formula: 600 × HDL-cholesterol/triglycerides/BMI), in comparison with three previously known fasting indexes, regarding correlation with the insulin clamp index, and for the predictive effects of future long-term risks of coronary heart disease (CHD) or manifest type 2 diabetes. A total of 1049 71-year-old male subjects from the Swedish ULSAM study, median follow-up 8 years, were included. All subjects performed the euglycemic insulin clamp, and analyses of four fasting insulin resistance indexes: SPISE-IR (= 10/SPISE), QUICKI-IR, Log HOMA-IR, and Revised QUICKI-IR. Spearman correlation coefficients with the insulin clamp were 0.60-0.62 for all indexes. Area under curve at ROC analysis was 0.80 for SPISE-IR, and 0.84 for QUICKI-IR, Log HOMA-IR, and Rev QUICKI-IR. Adjusted hazard ratios per 1 SD index increase for long-term risk CHD were similar in all patients: 1.20-1.24 ( = 0.02-0.03). However, comparing the highest quartile (recommended to define insulin resistance) with the lower quartiles, SPISE-IR was the strongest and the only statistically significant insulin resistance index: HR 1.53 ( = 0.02). Adjusted odds ratios per 1 SD index increase for long-term risk of type 2 diabetes were fairly similar ( < 0.001) in all patients: 1.62 for SPISE-IR, 1.97 for QUICKI-IR and Log HOMA-IR, and 2.04 for Rev QUICKI-IR, and also when comparing the highest versus the lower quartiles: 2.8-3.1 ( < 0.001). SPISE, easily applicable, performed equally well as other fasting insulin indexes previously recommended for clinical use, regarding correlation with the insulin clamp, and as predictor for future long-term risks of CHD or type 2 diabetes.
目前广泛使用空腹胰岛素抵抗指数。我们旨在分析一个新的空腹指数 SPISE(灵敏度公式:600×HDL-胆固醇/甘油三酯/BMI),与三个先前已知的空腹指数进行比较,以评估其与胰岛素钳夹指数的相关性,以及预测未来冠心病(CHD)或显性 2 型糖尿病的长期风险。共纳入来自瑞典 ULSAM 研究的 1049 名 71 岁男性受试者,中位随访 8 年。所有受试者均行正葡萄糖胰岛素钳夹试验,分析 4 种空腹胰岛素抵抗指数:SPISE-IR(=10/SPISE)、QUICKI-IR、Log HOMA-IR 和修订 QUICKI-IR。与胰岛素钳夹的 Spearman 相关系数为所有指数 0.60-0.62。ROC 分析的曲线下面积为 SPISE-IR 0.80,QUICKI-IR、Log HOMA-IR 和 Rev QUICKI-IR 为 0.84。所有患者的长期 CHD 风险指数每增加 1 SD 的调整后的危险比相似:1.20-1.24(=0.02-0.03)。然而,与最低四分位数相比,最高四分位数(推荐用于定义胰岛素抵抗),SPISE-IR 是最强且唯一具有统计学意义的胰岛素抵抗指数:HR 1.53(=0.02)。所有患者的长期 2 型糖尿病风险指数每增加 1 SD 的调整比值比相似(<0.001):SPISE-IR 为 1.62,QUICKI-IR 和 Log HOMA-IR 为 1.97,Rev QUICKI-IR 为 2.04,最高四分位数与最低四分位数相比:2.8-3.1(<0.001)。SPISE 易于应用,与先前推荐用于临床的其他空腹胰岛素指数在与胰岛素钳夹的相关性和预测 CHD 或 2 型糖尿病的未来长期风险方面表现相当。