Suppr超能文献

血糖控制对 1 型糖尿病青少年学习成绩的影响。

Glycemic control influences on academic performance in youth with Type 1 diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Disability and Psychoeducational Studies, University of Arizona.

出版信息

Sch Psychol. 2019 Nov;34(6):646-655. doi: 10.1037/spq0000320.

Abstract

This study examined how children's and adolescents' with Type 1 diabetes mellitus glucose levels during and prior to academic assessment contributed to performance on reading, writing, and mathematics tasks. Participants had a mean age of 13.69 (SD = 2.10); 44.6% were female and 58.1% reported their ethnicity to be Hispanic, Latino, or Mexican. They wore a continuous glucose monitor for approximately 6 days and completed a neurobehavioral evaluation that consisted of tasks assessing basic reading skills, reading fluency, reading comprehension, math fact fluency, math calculation, spelling, and writing fluency. Results indicated that individuals whose glucose levels were suboptimal (>140 mg/dL) or hyperglycemic (>180 mg/dL) had significantly lower scores on reading fluency (ηp2 = .16) and writing fluency (ηp2 = .28) subtests than those in the target range (70-140 mg/dL). Moreover, more time spent hypoglycemic (<70 mg/dL) within the 12 hr prior to the evaluation increased the risk for impaired performance on academic tasks. These findings support the need to move beyond considering only overall glycemic control to review temporal influences of glucose levels on academic performance. By tracking how fluctuations impact academic performance, school based practitioners can better determine necessary accommodations to buffer glycemic dysregulation effects. In particular, individuals whose glucose levels are frequently outside of the target range are at greatest risk for performing below their true academic potential. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本研究考察了 1 型糖尿病患儿和青少年在学术评估期间和之前的血糖水平如何影响阅读、写作和数学任务的表现。参与者的平均年龄为 13.69 岁(SD=2.10);44.6%为女性,58.1%报告其种族为西班牙裔、拉丁裔或墨西哥裔。他们佩戴连续血糖监测仪约 6 天,并完成了一项神经行为评估,其中包括评估基本阅读技能、阅读流畅度、阅读理解、数学事实流畅度、数学计算、拼写和写作流畅度的任务。结果表明,血糖水平不理想(>140mg/dL)或高血糖(>180mg/dL)的个体在阅读流畅度(ηp2=0.16)和写作流畅度(ηp2=0.28)子测试中的得分明显低于目标范围(70-140mg/dL)的个体。此外,评估前 12 小时内低血糖(<70mg/dL)时间的增加会增加在学术任务中表现受损的风险。这些发现支持超越仅考虑整体血糖控制的必要性,以回顾血糖水平对学术表现的时间影响。通过跟踪波动如何影响学术表现,学校的从业者可以更好地确定必要的适应措施来缓冲血糖失调的影响。特别是那些血糖水平经常超出目标范围的个体,其表现低于真实学术潜力的风险最大。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验