Foodborne and Waterborne Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Medical Microbiology, Charles University in Prague, 2nd Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Anaerobe. 2020 Feb;61:102113. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.102113. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
Clostridioides difficile and Staphylococcus aureus are two well-known pathogens both causing hospital- and community-acquired infections. However, their intestinal coexistence was not well investigated in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Herein, we explored the prevalence of C. difficile, S. aureus and their coexistence in the gut of Iranian patients with IBD. Fecal and colon specimens were obtained from 70 outpatients with underlying IBD, and investigated for the presence of C. difficile and S. aureus. C. difficile isolates were characterised by CE-ribotyping. PCR was used for detection of toxin-encoding genes of C. difficile and S. aureus isolates. The antimicrobial susceptibility testing of C. difficile and S. aureus isolates were examined by agar dilution and Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion methods, respectively. Totally, C. difficile and S. aureus were detected in only 5.7% and 15.8% of IBD flares. Coexistence of C. difficile and S. aureus was detected in 5.7% of IBD flares. Two different C. difficile ribotypes including RT 126 and RT 017 were identified showing toxin profiles of tcdAB/cdtAB and tcdAB, respectively. In S. aureus isolates, only positivity for the presence of sea enterotoxin was detected. C. difficile isolates were susceptible to metronidazole, ceftazidime and fidaxomicin. The highest resistance of S. aureus isolates was observed against penicillin (92.3%), following amoxicillin-clavulanate (38.5%) and amikacin (30.8%). Our findings demonstrated that patients with IBD flare are more sensitive to acquire coinfection of C. difficile and S. aureus than remission. However, more robust data is required to study the crosstalk between these enteric infections and their clinical relevance in patients with IBD flare.
艰难梭菌和金黄色葡萄球菌是两种众所周知的病原体,均可导致医院获得性和社区获得性感染。然而,它们在炎症性肠病(IBD)中的肠道共存情况尚未得到充分研究。在此,我们探索了艰难梭菌、金黄色葡萄球菌及其在伊朗 IBD 患者肠道中的共存情况。从 70 名患有潜在 IBD 的门诊患者中获得粪便和结肠标本,并对艰难梭菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的存在进行了研究。艰难梭菌分离株通过 CE-核糖体分型进行了特征描述。PCR 用于检测艰难梭菌和金黄色葡萄球菌分离株的毒素编码基因。艰难梭菌和金黄色葡萄球菌分离株的药敏试验分别通过琼脂稀释法和 Kirby-Bauer 纸片扩散法进行了检测。总的来说,在 IBD 发作中仅检测到艰难梭菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的检出率分别为 5.7%和 15.8%。在 5.7%的 IBD 发作中检测到艰难梭菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的共存。鉴定出两种不同的艰难梭菌核糖体类型,包括 RT 126 和 RT 017,分别显示 tcdAB/cdtAB 和 tcdAB 的毒素谱。在金黄色葡萄球菌分离株中,仅检测到存在 sea 肠毒素呈阳性。艰难梭菌分离株对甲硝唑、头孢他啶和非达霉素敏感。金黄色葡萄球菌分离株对青霉素(92.3%)的耐药性最高,其次是阿莫西林克拉维酸(38.5%)和阿米卡星(30.8%)。我们的研究结果表明,与缓解期相比,IBD 发作患者更容易发生艰难梭菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的合并感染。然而,需要更多的稳健数据来研究这些肠道感染之间的相互作用及其在 IBD 发作患者中的临床相关性。