Copp Jennifer E, Giordano Peggy C, Manning Wendy D, Longmore Monica A
Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA.
Socius. 2018 Jan-Feb;4. doi: 10.1177/2378023118779306. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
The aim of the current investigation was to examine the appropriateness of propensity score methods for the study of incarceration effects on children by directing attention to a range of conceptual and practical concerns, including the exclusion of theoretically meaningful covariates, the comparability of treatment and control groups, and potential ambiguities resulting from researcher-driven analytic decisions. Using data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, we examined the effects of maternal and paternal incarceration on a range of child well-being outcomes, including internalizing and externalizing problem behaviors, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test scores, and early juvenile delinquency. Our findings suggested that propensity scores and treatment effect estimates are highly sensitive to a number of decisions made by the researcher, including aspects where little consensus exists. In light of the conceptual underpinnings of propensity score analysis and existing data limitations, we suggest the potential utility of different identification methods and specialized data collection efforts.
当前调查的目的是通过关注一系列概念和实际问题,检验倾向得分方法用于研究监禁对儿童的影响是否合适,这些问题包括排除理论上有意义的协变量、治疗组和对照组的可比性,以及研究人员主导的分析决策所导致的潜在模糊性。利用脆弱家庭与儿童福祉研究的数据,我们考察了母亲和父亲被监禁对一系列儿童福祉结果的影响,包括内化和外化问题行为、皮博迪图片词汇测试分数以及早期青少年犯罪。我们的研究结果表明,倾向得分和治疗效果估计对研究人员做出的许多决策高度敏感,包括那些几乎没有共识的方面。鉴于倾向得分分析的概念基础和现有数据限制,我们建议采用不同识别方法和专门数据收集工作可能具有的效用。