Curtis D J, Cruess D F, Riordan D D, Allman R M
George Washington University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Washington, DC.
Invest Radiol. 1988 Jul;23(7):541-4. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198807000-00013.
Ranking residents as a means of semiobjective evaluation of their overall performance was described in 1985. The predictive nature of pooled faculty ranking of residents was stressed. Ranking of resident total scores on The American College In-training Examination and American Board of Radiology written examination was noted to be statistically related to the pooled faculty ranking. Similarly, the faculty ranking was predictive of itself in subsequent rankings. A cohesiveness of faculty consensus was present such that small numbers (five minimum) were predictive of larger groups of participating faculty. All reported observations persist in the new institution. Exceptions to expected residency level of training stratification (eg, third-year residents ranking in the midst of first-year residents, second-year residents ranking above many third-year residents) continue to be the most useful observation in counseling residents. Additional information reported includes sensitivity of the ranking to improvement or nonimprovement of probated residents.
1985年，对住院医师进行排名作为对其整体表现进行半客观评估的一种方式被提出。强调了住院医师综合教员排名的预测性。美国住院医师培训考试和美国放射学会笔试中住院医师总分的排名被发现与综合教员排名存在统计学关联。同样，教员排名在后续排名中对自身具有预测性。教员共识具有凝聚力，以至于少量（至少五人）教员的排名就能预测更多参与排名的教员群体。所有报告的观察结果在新机构中依然存在。预期的住院医师培训分层水平出现的例外情况（例如，三年级住院医师排名在一年级住院医师之中，二年级住院医师排名高于许多三年级住院医师）仍然是在指导住院医师时最有用的观察结果。报告的其他信息包括排名对见习住院医师进步或未进步情况的敏感性。
