Suppr超能文献

对有自杀风险的个体进行研究:评估和风险管理的方案。

Conducting Research with Individuals at Risk for Suicide: Protocol for Assessment and Risk Management.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA.

University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Apr;50(2):461-471. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12602. Epub 2019 Nov 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Suicide prediction, prevention, and intervention are urgent research areas. One barrier for research with high-risk populations is limited resources to manage risk in a research setting. We describe using the University of Washington Risk Assessment Protocol (UWRAP) to assess and manage suicide risk during phone-administered eligibility assessments in two clinical trials.

METHOD

Study 1 (N = 151) recruited suicidal adults who were not engaged in mental health treatment and Study 2 (N = 135) recruited suicidal adults who used alcohol to regulate emotions. Pre- and postassessment ratings of stress, urge to harm self, urge to use drugs/alcohol, and intent to harm self were compared and strategies to manage increased suicide risk following screening interviews were implemented, as indicated.

RESULTS

In both studies, average postassessment ratings were significantly lower than pre-assessment. A minority of participants reported higher ratings on one or more domains; however, following more thorough suicide risk assessment, risk was appropriately managed by providing low-level interventions (e.g., validation).

CONCLUSIONS

Suicide risk in research involving community participants can be managed by using appropriate risk protocols.

摘要

目的

自杀预测、预防和干预是紧迫的研究领域。对于高危人群的研究的一个障碍是在研究环境中管理风险的资源有限。我们描述了在两项临床试验的电话进行资格评估中使用华盛顿大学风险评估方案(UWRAP)评估和管理自杀风险的情况。

方法

研究 1(N=151)招募了没有接受心理健康治疗的有自杀倾向的成年人,研究 2(N=135)招募了使用酒精来调节情绪的有自杀倾向的成年人。比较了筛查访谈前后的压力、伤害自己的冲动、使用毒品/酒精的冲动和伤害自己的意图的评估评分,并根据需要实施了管理增加的自杀风险的策略。

结果

在两项研究中,平均后评估评分均显著低于前评估。少数参与者在一个或多个领域报告了更高的评分;然而,在进行更彻底的自杀风险评估后,通过提供低水平的干预措施(例如,验证),风险得到了适当的管理。

结论

通过使用适当的风险协议,可以管理涉及社区参与者的研究中的自杀风险。

相似文献

1
Conducting Research with Individuals at Risk for Suicide: Protocol for Assessment and Risk Management.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Apr;50(2):461-471. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12602. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
2
The effects of suicide ideation assessments on urges to self-harm and suicide.
Crisis. 2014;35(2):123-31. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000233.
5
The influence of minority stress on indicators of suicidality among lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender adults in Thailand.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Aug;28(4):656-669. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12713. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
6
Using predictive analytics to improve pragmatic trial design.
Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;17(4):394-401. doi: 10.1177/1740774520910367. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
7
Suicide Risk Management Protocol in Post-Cardiac Arrest Survivors: Development, Feasibility, and Outcomes.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Mar;14(3):363-367. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201609-694BC.
9
Association of Suicide and Other Mortality With Emergency Department Presentation.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917571. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17571.
10

引用本文的文献

2
Examining the Construct Validity of Experimental Suicide Images Among Young Adults.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2025 Apr;55(2):e70010. doi: 10.1111/sltb.70010.
3
Suicide risk assessment and management protocol for research within the Department of Veterans Affairs.
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2025 Apr;134(3):217-227. doi: 10.1037/abn0000968. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
4
Risky decision-making and nonsuicidal self-injury among university students: Examining the role of criticism feedback.
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 25;19(10):e0312081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312081. eCollection 2024.
5
Suicide risk assessment and suicide risk management protocol for the Texas Youth Depression and Suicide Research Network.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 May 25;33:101151. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101151. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Caring Texts, a strength-based, suicide prevention trial in 5 native communities: Research design and methods.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Dec;123:106966. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106966. Epub 2022 Oct 14.

本文引用的文献

3
Comparing brief interventions for suicidal individuals not engaged in treatment: A randomized clinical trial.
J Affect Disord. 2017 Nov;222:153-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
5
Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research.
Psychol Bull. 2017 Feb;143(2):187-232. doi: 10.1037/bul0000084. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
6
Ethical Issues and Practical Challenges in Suicide Research.
Crisis. 2017 Mar;38(2):107-114. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000415. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
7
Inclusion/exclusion criteria in late life depression antidepressant efficacy trials.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;32(9):1009-1016. doi: 10.1002/gps.4560. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
8
Are Trials of Computerized Therapy Generalizable? A Multidimensional Meta-analysis.
Telemed J E Health. 2016 May;22(5):450-7. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0129. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
9
Does assessing suicidality frequently and repeatedly cause harm? A randomized control study.
Psychol Assess. 2015 Dec;27(4):1171-81. doi: 10.1037/pas0000118. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
10
Suicide risk assessment and risk formulation part I: a focus on suicide ideation in assessing suicide risk.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2014 Aug;44(4):420-31. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12065.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验