Department of Psychology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA.
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Apr;50(2):461-471. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12602. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
Suicide prediction, prevention, and intervention are urgent research areas. One barrier for research with high-risk populations is limited resources to manage risk in a research setting. We describe using the University of Washington Risk Assessment Protocol (UWRAP) to assess and manage suicide risk during phone-administered eligibility assessments in two clinical trials.
Study 1 (N = 151) recruited suicidal adults who were not engaged in mental health treatment and Study 2 (N = 135) recruited suicidal adults who used alcohol to regulate emotions. Pre- and postassessment ratings of stress, urge to harm self, urge to use drugs/alcohol, and intent to harm self were compared and strategies to manage increased suicide risk following screening interviews were implemented, as indicated.
In both studies, average postassessment ratings were significantly lower than pre-assessment. A minority of participants reported higher ratings on one or more domains; however, following more thorough suicide risk assessment, risk was appropriately managed by providing low-level interventions (e.g., validation).
Suicide risk in research involving community participants can be managed by using appropriate risk protocols.
自杀预测、预防和干预是紧迫的研究领域。对于高危人群的研究的一个障碍是在研究环境中管理风险的资源有限。我们描述了在两项临床试验的电话进行资格评估中使用华盛顿大学风险评估方案(UWRAP)评估和管理自杀风险的情况。
研究 1(N=151)招募了没有接受心理健康治疗的有自杀倾向的成年人,研究 2(N=135)招募了使用酒精来调节情绪的有自杀倾向的成年人。比较了筛查访谈前后的压力、伤害自己的冲动、使用毒品/酒精的冲动和伤害自己的意图的评估评分,并根据需要实施了管理增加的自杀风险的策略。
在两项研究中,平均后评估评分均显著低于前评估。少数参与者在一个或多个领域报告了更高的评分;然而,在进行更彻底的自杀风险评估后,通过提供低水平的干预措施(例如,验证),风险得到了适当的管理。
通过使用适当的风险协议,可以管理涉及社区参与者的研究中的自杀风险。