• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神健康研究中自杀和风险管理协议的核心组成部分和策略:范围综述。

Core components and strategies for suicide and risk management protocols in mental health research: a scoping review.

机构信息

The Margaret and Wallace McCain Centre for Child, Youth and Family Mental Health, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

The Western Centre for Public Health and Family Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-03005-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-020-03005-0
PMID:33413192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7792084/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Suicide and risk management protocols in mental health research aim to ensure patient safety, provide vital information on how to assess suicidal ideation, manage risk, and respond to unexpected and expected situations. However, there is a lack of literature that identifies specific components and strategies to include in suicide and risk management protocols (SRMPs) for mental health research. The goal of this scoping review was to review academic and grey literature to determine core components and associated strategies, which can be used to inform SRMPs in mental health research.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The methodological framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley was used for this scoping review. The search strategy, conducted by a medical librarian, was multidisciplinary and included seven databases. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility criteria in each document and used a standardized charting form to extract relevant data. The extracted data were then examined using qualitative content analysis. Specifically, summative content analysis was used to identify the core components and strategies used in SRMPs. The data synthesis process was iterative.

RESULTS

This review included 36 documents, specifically 22 peer-reviewed articles and 14 documents from the grey literature. Five core components of SRMPs emerged from the reviewed literature including: training; educational resources for research staff; educational resources for research participants; risk assessment and management strategies; and clinical and research oversight. Potentials strategies for risk mitigation within each of the core components are outlined.

CONCLUSIONS

The five core components and associated strategies for inclusion in SRMPs will assist mental health researchers in conducting research safely and rigorously. Findings can inform the development of SRMPs and how to tailor them across various research contexts.

摘要

背景

精神健康研究中的自杀和风险管理方案旨在确保患者安全,提供有关如何评估自杀意念、管理风险以及应对意外和预期情况的重要信息。然而,缺乏确定精神健康研究中的自杀和风险管理方案(SRMP)中应包含的具体内容和策略的文献。本次范围综述的目的是审查学术和灰色文献,以确定核心内容和相关策略,从而为精神健康研究中的 SRMP 提供信息。

方法和分析

本范围综述采用了 Arksey 和 O'Malley 概述的方法框架。由医学图书馆员进行的搜索策略是多学科的,包括七个数据库。两名评审员独立评估每份文件的资格标准,并使用标准化图表表格提取相关数据。然后使用定性内容分析检查提取的数据。具体来说,采用总结性内容分析来确定 SRMP 中使用的核心内容和策略。数据综合过程是迭代的。

结果

本次综述包括 36 篇文献,具体为 22 篇同行评审文章和 14 篇灰色文献。从审查文献中出现了五个 SRMP 的核心内容,包括:培训;研究人员教育资源;研究参与者教育资源;风险评估和管理策略;临床和研究监督。概述了每个核心内容中潜在的风险缓解策略。

结论

SRMP 中包含的五个核心内容和相关策略将帮助精神健康研究人员安全严谨地进行研究。研究结果可以为 SRMP 的制定以及如何根据不同的研究背景进行调整提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd2/7792084/1f4de614462a/12888_2020_3005_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd2/7792084/1f4de614462a/12888_2020_3005_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd2/7792084/1f4de614462a/12888_2020_3005_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Core components and strategies for suicide and risk management protocols in mental health research: a scoping review.精神健康研究中自杀和风险管理协议的核心组成部分和策略:范围综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-03005-0.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Suicidal behaviours and moderator support in online health communities: protocol for a scoping review.自杀行为和在线健康社区中的调节支持:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 20;10(1):e034162. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034162.
4
Suicide prevention for international students: a scoping review protocol.预防国际学生自杀:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 17;12(2):e060266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060266.
5
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
6
Factors influencing suicide risk assessment clinical practice: protocol for a scoping review.影响自杀风险评估临床实践的因素:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 18;9(2):e026566. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026566.
7
Suicide risk assessment and suicide risk management protocol for the Texas Youth Depression and Suicide Research Network.德克萨斯青少年抑郁与自杀研究网络的自杀风险评估与自杀风险管理协议。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 May 25;33:101151. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101151. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Athletes' access to, attitudes towards and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: a scoping review protocol.运动员获取心理健康帮助的途径、态度和体验:系统综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e062279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062279.
9
Suicide capacity within the ideation-to-action framework: a scoping review protocol.意向到行动框架内的自杀能力:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 15;11(2):e043649. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043649.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Suicide risk assessment and management protocol for research within the Department of Veterans Affairs.美国退伍军人事务部内部研究的自杀风险评估与管理协议
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2025 Apr;134(3):217-227. doi: 10.1037/abn0000968. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
2
Hybrid 1 randomized controlled trial of an integrated stepped-care mental health intervention for traumatic injury patients.创伤患者综合分级照护心理干预的混合 1 随机对照试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Nov;146:107694. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107694. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
3
E-Mental Health Services in Canada: Can They Close the Access Gap?

本文引用的文献

1
Reporting scoping reviews-PRISMA ScR extension.报告范围综述——PRISMA ScR扩展版
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:177-179. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.016. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
2
Monitoring, assessing, and responding to suicide risk in clinical research.在临床研究中监测、评估和应对自杀风险。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 Jan;129(1):64-69. doi: 10.1037/abn0000489.
3
Conducting Research with Individuals at Risk for Suicide: Protocol for Assessment and Risk Management.对有自杀风险的个体进行研究:评估和风险管理的方案。
加拿大的电子心理健康服务:能否弥合服务可及性差距?
Healthc Policy. 2023 Aug;19(1):40-48. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2023.27159.
4
Suicide risk assessment and suicide risk management protocol for the Texas Youth Depression and Suicide Research Network.德克萨斯青少年抑郁与自杀研究网络的自杀风险评估与自杀风险管理协议。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 May 25;33:101151. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101151. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Mixed-methods study protocol for an evaluation of the mental health transition navigator model in child and adolescent mental health services: the Navigator Evaluation Advancing Transitions (NEAT) study.混合方法研究方案,用于评估儿童和青少年心理健康服务中的心理健康过渡导航员模式:导航员评估促进过渡(NEAT)研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 29;11(6):e051190. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051190.
6
Considerations for evaluating digital mental health tools remotely- reflections after a randomized trial of Thought Spot.远程评估数字心理健康工具的考量——Thought Spot随机试验后的思考
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021 May-Jun;70:76-77. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Apr;50(2):461-471. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12602. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
4
Adolescents' Engagement with Crisis Hotline Risk-management Services: A Report from the Emergency Department Screen for Teen Suicide Risk (ED-STARS) Study.青少年使用危机热线风险管理服务的情况:来自急诊科青少年自杀风险筛查研究的报告(ED-STARS 研究)。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Feb;50(1):72-82. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12558. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
E-mental health: Promising advancements in policy, research, and practice.电子心理健康:政策、研究与实践中的前景进展。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2019 Mar;32(2):56-62. doi: 10.1177/0840470418818583. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
6
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
7
Identifying core components and indicators of successful transitions from child to adult mental health services: a scoping review.确定儿童到成人心理健康服务成功过渡的核心要素和指标:范围综述。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;29(2):107-121. doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-1213-1. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
8
The benefits and risks of asking research participants about suicide: A meta-analysis of the impact of exposure to suicide-related content.询问研究参与者自杀相关问题的利弊:与自杀相关内容接触对研究的影响的荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Aug;64:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
9
Identifying and Developing Leadership Competencies in Health Research Organizations: A Pilot Study.识别与培养健康研究组织中的领导能力:一项试点研究。
J Health Adm Educ. 2012 Spring;29(2):135-154.
10
Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the 'how' and 'what' of patient engagement in health research.加拿大的患者参与:对健康研究中患者参与的“方式”和“内容”的范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 7;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0282-4.