Suppr超能文献

癫痫的补充和综合医学:患者和医生的看法。

Complementary and integrative medicine in epilepsy: What patients and physicians perceive.

机构信息

Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Jefferson Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Dec;101(Pt A):106545. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106545. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the extent to which people with epilepsy (PWE) use complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) to treat their illness and to assess their perceptions. We also investigated the perceptions of their treating physicians.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, all adult patients with epilepsy, who had the illness for at least one year, were recruited at the outpatient epilepsy clinic at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, from January 2019 until March 2019. A questionnaire was designed for this survey. We also designed a similar questionnaire to investigate perceptions of the physicians in the same region.

RESULTS

One hundred and one patients participated. Seventy-one patients (70%) believed that CIM would be helpful in treating seizures; the most commonly reported CIM therapies were prayers, exercise, and herbs. Sixteen patients (16%) had actually used CIM to treat their seizures, but only one patient perceived that CIM was more effective than antiepileptic drugs to bring her seizures under control. Thirty-one neurologists participated in the study. Seventeen neurologists (55%) believed that CIM would be helpful in treating epileptic seizures. The most commonly reported CIM therapies were meditation, yoga, and exercise.

CONCLUSION

Complementary and integrative medicine is considered and used by many PWE to treat epileptic seizures. Cultural issues probably play an important role in having faith in CIM. Physicians involved in the care of PWE should provide appropriate information regarding the safety and efficacy of various CIM treatments for PWE.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查癫痫患者(PWE)使用补充和整合医学(CIM)治疗疾病的程度,并评估他们的认知。我们还调查了他们的主治医生的认知。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,我们于 2019 年 1 月至 3 月在 Shiraz 医科大学的门诊癫痫诊所招募了所有患有癫痫至少一年的成年患者。为此调查设计了一份问卷。我们还设计了一份类似的问卷来调查同一地区医生的认知。

结果

共有 101 名患者参与。71 名患者(70%)认为 CIM 有助于治疗癫痫发作;报告最多的 CIM 疗法是祈祷、锻炼和草药。16 名患者(16%)实际上曾使用 CIM 治疗癫痫发作,但只有 1 名患者认为 CIM 比抗癫痫药物更有效,能控制她的癫痫发作。31 名神经科医生参与了这项研究。17 名神经科医生(55%)认为 CIM 有助于治疗癫痫发作。报告最多的 CIM 疗法是冥想、瑜伽和锻炼。

结论

许多 PWE 认为并使用补充和整合医学来治疗癫痫发作。文化问题可能在对 CIM 的信任中发挥重要作用。参与 PWE 护理的医生应为 PWE 提供有关各种 CIM 治疗方法的安全性和有效性的适当信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验