• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绘制遗嘱能力中的痴呆症和认知能力下降图谱。

Mapping dementia and cognitive decline in testamentary capacity.

机构信息

Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Wellview Consulting Rooms, North Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Sep-Oct;66:101450. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101450. Epub 2019 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101450
PMID:31706409
Abstract

Cognitive assessment is central to the evaluation of testamentary capacity. Such assessment is currently performed in a subjective, unreliable and non-standardized manner. Dementia, a cognitive illness, poses one of the largest threats to testamentary capacity in modern society. A better understanding of the ways in which dementia related cognitive impairment can affect a testator's ability to meet the relevant legal criteria to make a will is needed. A review of the literature over the past ten years focusing on what cognitive abilities are required to satisfy the legal criteria for testamentary capacity has highlighted an alarming scarcity of work in this area. There is little discussion spanning beyond general acknowledgement of the importance of memory and executive function. The specifics of how cognitive impairment impacts the four limbs of Banks v Goodfellow are rarely addressed. Several additional areas of cognitive function of importance to assessing testamentary capacity are the subject of this article.

摘要

认知评估是评估遗嘱能力的核心。目前,这种评估是主观的、不可靠的和非标准化的。痴呆症是一种认知疾病,是现代社会对遗嘱能力的最大威胁之一。需要更好地了解与痴呆症相关的认知障碍如何影响立遗嘱人满足相关法律标准以立遗嘱的能力。对过去十年中关于满足遗嘱能力法律标准所需的认知能力的文献进行回顾,突出表明在这一领域的工作严重不足。除了普遍认识到记忆和执行功能的重要性之外,几乎没有讨论。关于认知障碍如何影响 Banks v Goodfellow 的四个方面的具体内容很少被提及。本文还讨论了评估遗嘱能力的其他几个重要认知功能领域。

相似文献

1
Mapping dementia and cognitive decline in testamentary capacity.绘制遗嘱能力中的痴呆症和认知能力下降图谱。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Sep-Oct;66:101450. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101450. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
2
Psychiatric issues in retrospective challenges of testamentary capacity.遗嘱能力回顾性挑战中的精神问题
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;20(1):63-9. doi: 10.1002/gps.1257.
3
Deathbed wills: assessing testamentary capacity in the dying patient.临终遗嘱:评估临终患者的遗嘱能力。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Feb;26(2):209-16. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213001774. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
4
[Advanced investigation of testamentary capacity of the mentally disordered].[对精神障碍者遗嘱能力的深入调查]
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Jun;25(3):208-11.
5
Assessment of competency: a primer.能力评估:入门指南。
J Law Med. 2006 Nov;14(2):156-66.
6
Cognitive Fluctuations and the Lucid Interval in Dementia: Implications for Testamentary Capacity.认知波动与痴呆中的清醒期:对遗嘱能力的影响
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2015 Sep;43(3):287-92.
7
The Role of the Medical Expert in the Retrospective Assessment of Testamentary Capacity.医学专家在回顾性评估遗嘱能力中的作用。
Can J Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;66(3):255-261. doi: 10.1177/0706743720915007. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
8
Assessment of Testamentary Capacity in Older Adults: Description and Initial Validation of a Standardized Interview Instrument.老年人遗嘱能力评估:标准化访谈工具的描述和初步验证。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Aug 23;37(6):1133-1147. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acac028.
9
Testamentary capacity and guardianship assessments.遗嘱能力和监护评估。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2012 Dec;35(4):915-27. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2012.08.011. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
10
Financial and testamentary capacity evaluations: procedures and assessment instruments underneath a functional approach.财务和遗嘱能力评估:功能方法下的程序和评估工具。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Feb;26(2):217-28. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213001828. Epub 2013 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Testamentary capacity assessment in dementia using artificial intelligence: prospects and challenges.利用人工智能进行痴呆症遗嘱能力评估:前景与挑战
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 31;14:1137792. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1137792. eCollection 2023.