Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Apr;71(4):1305-1314.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.074. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
Patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) have a high risk of amputation and death. Death is a competing risk that affects the estimated amputation risk. Our aim was to find the specific risk factors for amputation for patients with CLI using competing risk analyses and compared these results with those from standard Cox regression analysis.
Patients who had undergone revascularization for CLI (2009-2013, with follow-up data until 2017) in Stockholm were identified from the Swedish National Registry for Vascular Surgery. The main outcome was major amputation. The risk factors for amputation were assessed using competing risk analysis and compared with the risk factors for amputation-free survival identified using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.
Of 855 patients with CLI, 178 had required a major amputation and 415 had died during the 8-year follow-up period. In the competing risk regression, age (subdistribution hazard ratio [sub-HR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.00), ambulatory status (independent vs bedridden; sub-HR, 4.10; 95% CI, 2.14-7.86), and ischemic wound vs rest pain (sub-HR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.72-5.36) were associated with amputation, considering death as a competing risk. In contrast, Cox regression analysis identified female vs male (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.94), age (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), renal impairment (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.61-2.67), ambulatory status (independent vs bedridden; HR, 3.45; 95% CI, 2.30-5.18), and ischemic wound vs rest pain (HR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.78-3.25) as risk factors.
The risk factors associated with amputation differed when analyzing the data using competing risk regression vs Cox regression. The differences between the analyses indicated that a risk exists for biased estimates using standard survival methods when a strong competing risk such as death is present.
患有严重肢体缺血(CLI)的患者有很高的截肢和死亡风险。死亡是一种竞争风险,会影响截肢风险的估计。我们的目的是使用竞争风险分析为 CLI 患者确定特定的截肢风险因素,并将这些结果与标准 Cox 回归分析的结果进行比较。
从瑞典血管外科学国家登记处确定了 2009-2013 年接受 CLI 血运重建治疗(并随访至 2017 年)的患者。主要结局是主要截肢。使用竞争风险分析评估截肢的风险因素,并与 Cox 比例风险回归分析确定的无截肢生存率的风险因素进行比较。
在 855 名 CLI 患者中,178 人需要进行主要截肢,415 人在 8 年的随访期间死亡。在竞争风险回归中,年龄(亚分布风险比[sub-HR],0.98;95%置信区间[CI],0.97-1.00)、活动状态(独立 vs 卧床不起;sub-HR,4.10;95%CI,2.14-7.86)和缺血性伤口 vs 静息痛(sub-HR,3.03;95%CI,1.72-5.36)与考虑死亡为竞争风险的截肢相关。相比之下,Cox 回归分析确定了女性与男性(风险比[HR],0.77;95%CI,0.64-0.94)、年龄(HR,1.02;95%CI,1.01-1.03)、肾功能不全(HR,2.08;95%CI,1.61-2.67)、活动状态(独立 vs 卧床不起;HR,3.45;95%CI,2.30-5.18)和缺血性伤口 vs 静息痛(HR,2.41;95%CI,1.78-3.25)为风险因素。
当使用竞争风险回归与 Cox 回归分析数据时,与截肢相关的风险因素不同。分析之间的差异表明,当存在强烈的竞争风险(如死亡)时,使用标准生存方法存在偏倚估计的风险。