Center for Personalized Health, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Health Psychol Rev. 2020 Mar;14(1):43-65. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1691622. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
Self-regulation processes assume a major role in health behaviour theory and are postulated as important mechanisms of action in behavioural interventions to improve health prevention and management. The need to better understand mechanisms of behaviour change interventions for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) called for conducting a meta-review of meta-analyses for interventions targeting self-regulation processes. The protocol, preregistered on Open Science Framework (OSF), found 15 eligible meta-analyses, published between 2006 and August 2019, which quantitatively assessed the role of self-regulatory mechanisms and behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Quality of the meta-analyses varied widely according to AMSTAR-2 criteria. Several BCTs, assumed to engage self-regulatory mechanisms, were unevenly represented in CVD meta-analytic reviews. Self-monitoring, the most frequently studied self-regulatory BCT, seemed to improve health behaviour change and health outcomes but these results merit cautious interpretation. Findings for other self-regulatory BCTs were less promising. No studies in the CVD domain directly tested engagement of self-regulation processes. A general challenge for this area stems from reliance on post-hoc tests of the effects of BCTs in multiple-component interventions. Recent advances in BCT taxonomies and the experimental medicine approach to engaging self-regulation mechanisms, however, provide opportunities to improve CVD prevention and management behavioural interventions.
自我调节过程在健康行为理论中起着重要作用,并被假设为改善健康预防和管理的行为干预的重要作用机制。需要更好地了解心血管疾病 (CVD) 行为改变干预措施的机制,因此呼吁对针对自我调节过程的干预措施进行元分析综述。该方案在开放科学框架 (OSF) 上预先注册,发现了 15 项符合条件的元分析,这些元分析发表于 2006 年至 2019 年 8 月之间,定量评估了自我调节机制和行为改变技术 (BCT) 的作用。根据 AMSTAR-2 标准,元分析的质量差异很大。一些被认为涉及自我调节机制的 BCT 在 CVD 元分析综述中代表性不足。自我监测是研究最多的自我调节 BCT,似乎可以改善健康行为改变和健康结果,但这些结果值得谨慎解释。其他自我调节 BCT 的结果则不那么有希望。在 CVD 领域,没有研究直接测试自我调节过程的参与。该领域的一个普遍挑战源于对多成分干预措施中 BCT 效果的事后检验的依赖。然而,BCT 分类法和参与自我调节机制的实验医学方法的最新进展为改善 CVD 预防和管理行为干预措施提供了机会。