• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

责任、理性与接受:自动驾驶未来用户如何在利益相关者的社会技术想象中被建构。

Responsibility, rationality, and acceptance: How future users of autonomous driving are constructed in stakeholders' sociotechnical imaginaries.

机构信息

University of Münster, Germany.

University of Stuttgart, Germany.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2020 Jan;29(1):61-75. doi: 10.1177/0963662519885550. Epub 2019 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1177/0963662519885550
PMID:31709906
Abstract

Although autonomous driving is expected to provide a solution for various mobility-related issues, ideas on how the technology will actually unfold are vague. Nevertheless, stakeholders in the field hold expectations about the technology and the future users. With very few exceptions, so far research does not focus on these expectations as social constructions of individuals and publics. In addition, these perceptions play only a minor role in the technology-centered debate. Thus, to bring these perceptions to light and to analyze their implications, we draw on the sociotechnical imaginaries approach to reconstruct stakeholders' views of future users and publics. We perform a qualitative content analysis and show that imaginaries unfold along the themes of responsibility for the process of driving, rationality in decision-making, and acceptance for emerging technologies. We discuss how the themes relate to each other, what role science plays, and what implications follow from the respective stakeholders' views.

摘要

虽然自动驾驶有望为各种与出行相关的问题提供解决方案,但人们对这项技术的实际发展方向还存在诸多疑问。不过,该领域的利益相关者还是对这项技术及其未来用户抱有一定的期望。到目前为止,除了极少数的例外情况,研究还没有将这些期望作为个人和公众的社会建构来关注。此外,这些看法在以技术为中心的辩论中只扮演了次要角色。因此,为了让这些看法浮出水面,并分析它们的影响,我们借鉴社会技术想象方法,重构利益相关者对未来用户和公众的看法。我们进行了定性内容分析,结果表明,这些想象是沿着以下主题展开的:对驾驶过程负责、决策的合理性以及对新兴技术的接受程度。我们讨论了这些主题之间的相互关系、科学扮演的角色,以及各自的利益相关者观点所带来的影响。

相似文献

1
Responsibility, rationality, and acceptance: How future users of autonomous driving are constructed in stakeholders' sociotechnical imaginaries.责任、理性与接受:自动驾驶未来用户如何在利益相关者的社会技术想象中被建构。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Jan;29(1):61-75. doi: 10.1177/0963662519885550. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
2
The everyday lives of energy transitions: Contested sociotechnical imaginaries in the American West.能源转型的日常生活:美国西部备受争议的社会技术想象
Soc Stud Sci. 2016 Jun;46(3):327-350. doi: 10.1177/0306312716644534.
3
Sociotechnical imaginaries in academic medicine strategic planning: a document analysis.学术医学战略规划中的社会技术想象:文献分析。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Sep;29(4):1435-1451. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10339-x. Epub 2024 May 27.
4
'Nothing to do with the science': How an elite sociotechnical imaginary cements policy resistance to public perspectives on science and technology through the machinery of government.“与科学无关”:一种精英社会技术想象如何通过政府机制巩固政策对公众科技观点的抵制。
Soc Stud Sci. 2020 Aug;50(4):589-608. doi: 10.1177/0306312719879768. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
5
Sociotechnical imaginaries of low-carbon waste-energy futures: UK techno-market fixes displacing public accountability.低碳垃圾能源未来的社会技术想象:英国的技术市场解决方案取代了公共问责制。
Soc Stud Sci. 2020 Aug;50(4):609-641. doi: 10.1177/0306312720905084. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
6
Governing through imaginaries: on the place and role of constructions of Japan within UK policy discourse regarding science, technology, and innovation.通过想象进行治理:论日本形象塑造在英国关于科学、技术与创新的政策话语中的地位和作用。
J Law Biosci. 2021 Aug 16;8(2):lsaa007. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa007. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.
7
Regulatory or regulating publics? The European Union's regulation of emerging health technologies and citizen participation.监管公众还是受监管的公众?欧盟对新兴健康技术的监管与公民参与
Med Law Rev. 2013 Winter;21(1):39-70. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fws039. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
8
Engaging with the political imaginaries of science: Near misses and future targets.参与科学的政治想象:险些失误与未来目标。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):16-20. doi: 10.1177/0963662513476220.
9
Key stakeholders' perceptions of the acceptability and usefulness of a tablet-based tool to improve communication and shared decision making in ICUs.关键利益相关者对一种基于平板电脑的工具在重症监护病房(ICU)中改善沟通和共同决策的可接受性和有用性的看法。
J Crit Care. 2016 Jun;33:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.01.030. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
10
Stakeholders' views about cardiac report cards: a qualitative study.利益相关者对心脏报告卡的看法:一项定性研究。
Can J Cardiol. 2004 Mar 15;20(4):433-8.