Department of Neurosurgery, Xi'an International Medical Center, Xi'an, China.
Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 10;9(11):e028706. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028706.
To evaluate patient satisfaction and associated predictors at discharge, as well as patient experience at 30-day follow-up, in a neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme.
A single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled study.
A tertiary hospital in China.
A total of 140 neurosurgical patients aged 18-65 years old who had a single intracranial lesion and were admitted for elective craniotomy between October 2016 and July 2017 were included.
Patients were randomised into two groups: 70 patients received care according to a novel neurosurgical ERAS protocol (ERAS group) and 70 patients received conventional perioperative care (control group).
Patient satisfaction at discharge was evaluated using a multimodal questionnaire. A secondary analysis of patient experience regarding participation in the ERAS programme was conducted using a semistructured qualitative interview via telephone at 30-day follow-up.
The mean patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the ERAS group than in the control group at discharge (92.2±4.3 vs 86.8±7.4, p=0.0001). The most important predictors of patient satisfaction included age (OR=6.934), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score (OR=0.184), absorbable skin suture (OR=0.007) and postoperative length of stay (LOS) (OR=0.765). Analysis on patient experience revealed five themes: information transfer, professional support, shared responsibility and active participation, readiness for discharge, and follow-up, all of which are closely related and represent positive and negative aspects.
Measures that include decreasing PONV VAS score, incorporating absorbable skin suture and shortening LOS seem to increase patient satisfaction in a neurosurgical ERAS programme. Analysis of data on patient experience highlights several aspects to achieve patient-centred and high-quality care. Further studies are warranted to standardise the assessment of patient satisfaction and experience in planning, employing and appraising the ERAS programme.
ChiCTR-INR-16009662.
评估神经外科加速康复外科(ERAS)方案出院时患者满意度及其相关预测因素,以及术后 30 天随访时的患者体验。
单中心、前瞻性、随机对照研究。
中国一家三级医院。
纳入 2016 年 10 月至 2017 年 7 月期间因颅内单发病变择期行开颅手术的 140 例年龄在 18-65 岁之间的神经外科患者。
患者随机分为两组:70 例患者接受新型神经外科 ERAS 方案治疗(ERAS 组),70 例患者接受常规围手术期护理(对照组)。
采用多模式问卷评估患者出院时的满意度。术后 30 天通过电话进行半结构定性访谈,对患者参与 ERAS 方案的体验进行二次分析。
ERAS 组患者的满意度显著高于对照组(92.2±4.3 比 86.8±7.4,p=0.0001)。患者满意度的最重要预测因素包括年龄(OR=6.934)、术后恶心呕吐(PONV)视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分(OR=0.184)、可吸收皮肤缝线(OR=0.007)和术后住院时间(LOS)(OR=0.765)。对患者体验的分析揭示了五个主题:信息传递、专业支持、共同责任和积极参与、准备出院和随访,这些主题相互关联,代表了积极和消极的方面。
降低 PONV VAS 评分、采用可吸收皮肤缝线和缩短 LOS 等措施似乎可以提高神经外科 ERAS 方案的患者满意度。对患者体验数据的分析突出了实现以患者为中心和高质量护理的几个方面。需要进一步的研究来标准化 ERAS 方案的患者满意度和体验评估、实施和评估。
ChiCTR-INR-16009662。