• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Sharing information electronically with other hospitals is associated with increased sharing of patients.与其他医院电子共享信息与增加患者共享相关。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb;55(1):128-135. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13240. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
2
The relationship between hospital and ehr vendor market dynamics on health information organization presence and participation.医院与电子健康记录供应商市场动态对健康信息组织的存在和参与的关系。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 May 8;18(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0605-y.
3
Geography of community health information organization activity in the United States: Implications for the effectiveness of health information exchange.美国社区卫生信息组织活动的地理分布:对健康信息交换有效性的影响
Health Care Manage Rev. 2017 Apr/Jun;42(2):132-141. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000103.
4
The associations between query-based and directed health information exchange with potentially avoidable use of health care services.基于查询的定向健康信息交换与潜在可避免的医疗服务利用之间的关联。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):981-993. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13169. Epub 2019 May 21.
5
Hospital electronic health information exchange grew substantially in 2008-12.2008-12 年期间,医院间电子健康信息交换大幅增长。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug;32(8):1346-54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0010.
6
Vendor of choice and the effectiveness of policies to promote health information exchange.首选供应商以及促进健康信息交换政策的有效性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3230-7.
7
Association of Hospital Interoperable Data Sharing With Alternative Payment Model Participation.医院互操作数据共享与替代性支付模式参与的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Feb 18;3(2):e215199. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.5199. eCollection 2022 Feb.
8
Gaps in health information exchange between hospitals that treat many shared patients.医院之间在治疗许多共同患者的健康信息交流方面存在差距。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1114-1121. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy089.
9
Electronic Connectivity Among US Hospitals Treating Shared Patients.美国治疗共享患者的医院之间的电子连接。
Med Care. 2022 Dec 1;60(12):880-887. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001773. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
10
Assessing the impact of health system organizational structure on hospital electronic data sharing.评估卫生系统组织结构对医院电子数据共享的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1147-1152. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy084.

引用本文的文献

1
Information-blocking trends following regulatory action.监管行动后的信息封锁趋势。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Apr 1;32(4):665-674. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf007.
2
Recent Advances and Future Directions in Syncope Management: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.晕厥管理的最新进展与未来方向:一篇全面的叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 26;13(3):727. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030727.
3
Experiences with information blocking in the United States: a national survey of hospitals.美国信息阻断的经验:一项针对医院的全国性调查。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 May 19;30(6):1150-1157. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad060.
4
Transforming Health Data to Actionable Information: Recent Progress and Future Opportunities in Health Information Exchange.将健康数据转化为可操作的信息:健康信息交换的最新进展和未来机遇。
Yearb Med Inform. 2022 Aug;31(1):203-214. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742519. Epub 2022 Dec 4.
5
The role of electronic health record developers in hospital patient sharing.电子健康记录开发者在医院患者共享中的作用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jan 29;29(3):435-442. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab263.
6
Information blocking remains prevalent at the start of 21st Century Cures Act: results from a survey of health information exchange organizations.信息阻断在 21 世纪治愈法案开始实施时仍然普遍存在:来自健康信息交换组织的调查结果。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 18;28(4):727-732. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa323.
7
Clinical Information Systems - Seen through the Ethics Lens.临床信息系统——从伦理视角看。
Yearb Med Inform. 2020 Aug;29(1):104-114. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701996. Epub 2020 Aug 21.

本文引用的文献

1
The implications and impact of 3 approaches to health information exchange: community, enterprise, and vendor-mediated health information exchange.三种健康信息交换方式的含义及影响:社区、企业和供应商介导的健康信息交换。
Learn Health Syst. 2017 Jan 6;1(2):e10021. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10021. eCollection 2017 Apr.
2
Hospitals Strengthened Relationships With Close Partners After Joining Accountable Care Organizations.医疗机构加入责任医疗组织后,与紧密合作伙伴的关系得到加强。
Med Care Res Rev. 2020 Dec;77(6):549-558. doi: 10.1177/1077558718818336. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
3
Gaps in health information exchange between hospitals that treat many shared patients.医院之间在治疗许多共同患者的健康信息交流方面存在差距。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1114-1121. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy089.
4
Hospitals' adoption of intra-system information exchange is negatively associated with inter-system information exchange.医院采用系统内信息交换与系统间信息交换呈负相关。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1189-1196. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy058.
5
Changes in specialty care use and leakage in Medicare accountable care organizations.医疗保险责任制照顾组织中专科医疗服务使用的变化和渗漏。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 May 1;24(5):e141-e149.
6
The benefits of health information exchange: an updated systematic review.健康信息交换的益处:更新的系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1259-1265. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy035.
7
Information Blocking: Is It Occurring and What Policy Strategies Can Address It?信息封锁:它是否正在发生,以及哪些政策策略可以应对?
Milbank Q. 2017 Mar;95(1):117-135. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12247.
8
Less Physician Practice Competition Is Associated With Higher Prices Paid For Common Procedures.医生执业竞争减少与常见手术支付的更高价格相关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Oct;34(10):1753-60. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0412.
9
Health Information Technology and Care Coordination: The Next Big Opportunity for Informatics?健康信息技术与护理协调:信息学的下一个重大机遇?
Yearb Med Inform. 2015 Aug 13;10(1):11-4. doi: 10.15265/IY-2015-020. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
10
Does health information exchange reduce redundant imaging? Evidence from emergency departments.健康信息交换是否能减少重复成像?来自急诊科的证据。
Med Care. 2014 Mar;52(3):227-34. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000067.

与其他医院电子共享信息与增加患者共享相关。

Sharing information electronically with other hospitals is associated with increased sharing of patients.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.

School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb;55(1):128-135. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13240. Epub 2019 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.13240
PMID:31721183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6980958/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

One potential benefit of greater electronic health information exchange is a reduction in the effort required for patients to switch between providers. We therefore assessed whether hospital participation in health information organizations (HIOs) led to increased patient sharing.

DATA SOURCES

Secondary data from 2010 to 2016.

STUDY DESIGN

Using hospital-pair and year fixed effects regression models, we assessed change in patient sharing volume following HIO participation by hospitals and compared the effect by the level of market competition and by hospital size.

DATA EXTRACTION METHODS

We used national data on hospital participation in HIOs from the American Hospital Association Information Technology Supplement and data on the volume of Medicare patients shared between pairs of hospitals from 2010 to 2016.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The volume of patients shared between hospitals increased by 2.6 percent when both hospitals participated in a health information organization (P = .008, 95% CI: 0.7%-4.5%). This increase was greater in competitive markets (3.1 percent increase, P = .03 95% CI: 0.3%-5.9%) and between large hospitals (4.3 percent increase, P = .007 95% CI: 1.2%-7.3%). Participation by only one hospital in a pair had no effect on patient sharing.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that an important policy goal motivating the investment in health information exchange has been at least partially achieved. However, our results also support hospital concerns about the competitive implications of engaging in health information exchange. HIO participation appears to facilitate patient movement between hospitals, likely by lowering switching costs and resulting in greater competition.

摘要

目的

电子健康信息交换增加的一个潜在好处是减少患者在提供者之间切换的工作量。因此,我们评估了医院参与健康信息组织(HIO)是否会导致患者共享增加。

数据来源

2010 年至 2016 年的二手资料。

研究设计

使用医院对和年份固定效应回归模型,我们评估了医院参与 HIO 后患者共享量的变化,并比较了市场竞争程度和医院规模的影响。

数据提取方法

我们使用美国医院协会信息技术补充报告中的全国医院参与 HIO 的数据以及 2010 年至 2016 年期间医院间共享医疗保险患者量的数据。

主要发现

当两家医院都参与健康信息组织时,医院之间的患者共享量增加了 2.6%(P=0.008,95%CI:0.7%-4.5%)。在竞争激烈的市场中,这一增长幅度更大(3.1%的增长,P=0.03,95%CI:0.3%-5.9%),在大型医院之间增长幅度更大(4.3%的增长,P=0.007,95%CI:1.2%-7.3%)。一对医院中只有一家参与对患者共享没有影响。

结论

我们的结果表明,推动健康信息交换投资的一个重要政策目标至少已经部分实现。然而,我们的结果也支持了医院对参与健康信息交换的竞争影响的担忧。HIO 参与似乎通过降低转换成本促进了患者在医院之间的流动,并导致了更大的竞争。