Bonizzio Carolina Reis, Nagao Christopher K, Polho Gabriel B, Paes Vitor R
. Médica Generalista da FMUSP, diretora da Expedição Cirúrgica da Bandeira Científica (ECBC) em 2016, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
. Médico Generalista da FMUSP, diretor da Expedição Cirúrgica da Bandeira Científica (ECBC)2016, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Nov 7;65(10):1300-1307. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.10.1300. eCollection 2019.
Instructors were trained according to the 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines, with emphasis on CPR. Dummies made with PET bottles were used, and a questionnaire was applied to the participants before and after training. Statistical analysis was performed in the R commander program. Participants with incomplete documents were excluded from the study.
Out of 101 participants, 96 were included: 69 lay people, 17 health professionals, and ten health students. There was an improvement in the overall performance after training (mean pre: 62.7%, mean post: 75.8%, p <0.01), also present in the following main concepts: "mouth-to-mouth breathing is not necessary" (p <0.01), "risk of contamination" (p <0.01), "compression technique" (p <0.01). The concepts "recognition of severity" and "what is chest compression" did not improve, but had good pre-test means, 96.8% and 81.2%. There was no statistical difference in the knowledge between the groups (laypeople vs. health professionals and students, pre=0,06 e post=0,33).
The tools used in training were efficient. However, further studies are necessary to assess the long-term impact of this intervention.
1）评估一种培训非专业人员进行心肺复苏（CPR）的新方法的效率。2）评估参与者之前的知识水平。
根据2015年美国心脏协会指南对培训师进行培训，重点是心肺复苏。使用由PET瓶制成的人体模型，并在培训前后对参与者进行问卷调查。在R commander程序中进行统计分析。文件不完整的参与者被排除在研究之外。
101名参与者中，96名被纳入研究：69名非专业人员、17名卫生专业人员和10名卫生专业学生。培训后整体表现有所改善（培训前平均：62.7%，培训后平均：75.8%，p<0.01），以下主要概念也有改善：“口对口呼吸不必要”（p<0.01）、“污染风险”（p<0.01）、“按压技术”（p<0.01）。“严重程度识别”和“什么是胸外按压”这两个概念没有改善，但预测试平均水平良好，分别为96.8%和81.2%。两组之间的知识水平没有统计学差异（非专业人员与卫生专业人员和学生相比，培训前=0.06，培训后=0.33）。
培训中使用的工具是有效的。然而，需要进一步研究来评估这种干预的长期影响。
