• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和验证快速环境 DNA(eDNA)检测方法用于沼泽龟(Glyptemys muhlenbergii)。

Development and validation of rapid environmental DNA (eDNA) detection methods for bog turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii).

机构信息

SUNY-ESF, Department of Environmental and Forest Biology, Syracuse, NY, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Nov 14;14(11):e0222883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222883. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0222883
PMID:31725720
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6855662/
Abstract

Bog turtles (Glyptemys muhlenbergii) are listed as Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) for wildlife action plans in every state it occurs and multi-state efforts are underway to better characterize extant populations and prioritize restoration efforts. However, traditional sampling methods can be ineffective due to the turtle's wetland habitat, small size, and burrowing nature. Molecular methods, such as qPCR, provide the ability to overcome this challenge by effectively quantifying minute amounts of turtle DNA left behind in its environment (eDNA). Developing such methods for bog turtles has proved difficult partly because of the high sequence similarity between bog turtles and closely-related, cohabitating species, most often wood turtles (Glyptemys insculpta). Additionally, substrates containing bog turtle eDNA are often rich in organics or other substances that frequently inhibit both DNA extraction and qPCR amplification. Here, we describe the development and validation of a qPCR assay, BT3, targeting the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene that correctly identifies bog turtles with 100% specificity and sensitivity when tested on 201 blood samples collected from six species over a wide geographic range. We also developed a full-process internal control employing a genetically modified strain of Caenorhabditis elegans to improve DNA extraction methods, limit false negative results due to qPCR inhibition, and measure total DNA recovery from each sample. Using the internal control, we found that DNA recovery varied by over an order of magnitude between samples and likely explains the lack of bog turtle detection in some cases. Methods presented herein are highly-specific and may offer a more cost effective, non-invasive tool to supplement bog turtle population assessments in the Eastern United States. Poor or differential DNA recovery, which remains unmeasured in the vast majority of eDNA studies, significantly reduced the ability to detect bog turtle in their natural environment.

摘要

斑鳖(Glyptemys muhlenbergii)被列为每个州野生动物行动计划中最需要保护的物种(SGCN),并且正在进行多州合作,以更好地描述现存种群并优先进行恢复工作。然而,由于龟类的湿地栖息地、体型小和穴居的习性,传统的采样方法可能效果不佳。分子方法,如 qPCR,可以有效地量化龟类在其环境中遗留的微量 DNA,从而克服这一挑战。为斑鳖开发这种方法一直很困难,部分原因是斑鳖与亲缘关系密切、共同生活的物种(最常见的是木雕龟 Glyptemys insculpta)之间的序列高度相似。此外,含有斑鳖 eDNA 的基质通常富含有机物或其他物质,这些物质经常抑制 DNA 提取和 qPCR 扩增。在这里,我们描述了一种 qPCR 测定法 BT3 的开发和验证,该方法针对线粒体细胞色素氧化酶 I 基因,在对来自六个物种、分布广泛的 201 个血液样本进行测试时,具有 100%的特异性和灵敏度。我们还开发了一个完整过程的内部对照,使用经过基因改造的秀丽隐杆线虫(Caenorhabditis elegans)来改良 DNA 提取方法,减少由于 qPCR 抑制导致的假阴性结果,并测量每个样本的总 DNA 回收量。使用内部对照,我们发现 DNA 回收率在样本之间差异超过一个数量级,这可能解释了在某些情况下缺乏斑鳖检测的原因。本文介绍的方法具有高度特异性,可能为补充美国东部的斑鳖种群评估提供一种更具成本效益、非侵入性的工具。在绝大多数 eDNA 研究中,DNA 回收率差或差异较大,这大大降低了在其自然环境中检测斑鳖的能力。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of rapid environmental DNA (eDNA) detection methods for bog turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii).开发和验证快速环境 DNA(eDNA)检测方法用于沼泽龟(Glyptemys muhlenbergii)。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 14;14(11):e0222883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222883. eCollection 2019.
2
Concurrent visual encounter sampling validates eDNA selectivity and sensitivity for the endangered wood turtle (Glyptemys insculpta).同时进行的视觉偶遇采样验证了濒危的木雕龟(Glyptemys insculpta)的 DNA 选择性和敏感性。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 24;14(4):e0215586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215586. eCollection 2019.
3
Three novel herpesviruses of endangered Clemmys and Glyptemys turtles.濒危木纹龟属和木雕水龟属乌龟的三种新型疱疹病毒。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0122901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122901. eCollection 2015.
4
A Mycoplasma species of Emydidae turtles in the northeastern USA.美国东北部水龟科龟类中的一种支原体。
J Wildl Dis. 2015 Apr;51(2):466-70. doi: 10.7589/2014-04-086. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
5
Development and Validation of Environmental DNA (eDNA) Markers for Detection of Freshwater Turtles.用于检测淡水龟的环境DNA(eDNA)标记的开发与验证
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 22;10(7):e0130965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130965. eCollection 2015.
6
Environmental DNA bioassays corroborate field data for detection of overwintering species at risk Blanding's turtles ().环境 DNA 生物测定法为冬季物种的检测提供了野外数据的佐证,这些物种处于濒危状态的 Blanding 龟 ()。
Genome. 2021 Mar;64(3):299-310. doi: 10.1139/gen-2020-0043. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
7
Environmental DNA detection of endangered and invasive species in Kejimkujik National Park and Historic Site.在基吉柯吉克国家公园和历史遗址中利用环境 DNA 检测濒危和入侵物种。
Genome. 2021 Mar;64(3):172-180. doi: 10.1139/gen-2020-0042. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
8
Detection and population genomics of sea turtle species via noninvasive environmental DNA analysis of nesting beach sand tracks and oceanic water.通过对筑巢海滩沙道和海洋水体的非侵入性环境 DNA 分析来检测和进行海龟物种的种群基因组学研究。
Mol Ecol Resour. 2022 Oct;22(7):2471-2493. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13617. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
9
Impact of natural resource extraction on thermal properties of wood turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) habitat.自然资源开采对木雕龟(Glyptemys insculpta)栖息地热特性的影响。
J Therm Biol. 2019 Aug;84:469-478. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.07.031. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
10
Mycoplasmopsis-associated Proliferative Pneumonia in a Bog Turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii).与支原体相关的增殖性肺炎在沼泽龟(Glyptemys muhlenbergii)中。
J Wildl Dis. 2024 Jul 1;60(3):783-785. doi: 10.7589/JWD-D-23-00150.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of applications of environmental DNA for reptile conservation and management.环境DNA在爬行动物保护与管理中的应用综述。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Jun 5;12(6):e8995. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8995. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Environmental DNA analysis confirms extant populations of the cryptic Irwin's turtle within its historical range.环境 DNA 分析证实,神秘的 Irwin's 龟在其历史分布范围内仍有现存种群。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2022 May 2;22(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12862-022-02009-6.
3
Using eDNA techniques to find the endangered big-headed turtle (Platysternon megacephalum).利用环境 DNA 技术寻找濒危大头乌龟(Platysternon megacephalum)。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 7;17(2):e0262015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262015. eCollection 2022.
4
Integrative Survey of 68 Non-overlapping Upstate New York Watersheds Reveals Stream Features Associated With Aquatic Fecal Contamination.对纽约州北部68个不重叠流域的综合调查揭示了与水生粪便污染相关的溪流特征。
Front Microbiol. 2021 Aug 12;12:684533. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.684533. eCollection 2021.
5
Co-quantification of crAssphage increases confidence in wastewater-based epidemiology for SARS-CoV-2 in low prevalence areas.交叉影噬菌体的联合定量提高了低流行地区基于废水的新冠病毒流行病学监测的可信度。
Water Res X. 2021 May 1;11:100100. doi: 10.1016/j.wroa.2021.100100. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
6
Landscape, Water Quality, and Weather Factors Associated With an Increased Likelihood of Foodborne Pathogen Contamination of New York Streams Used to Source Water for Produce Production.与纽约用于农产品生产水源的溪流中食源性病原体污染可能性增加相关的景观、水质和天气因素。
Front Sustain Food Syst. 2020 Feb;3. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00124. Epub 2020 Feb 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Needle in a haystack? A comparison of eDNA metabarcoding and targeted qPCR for detection of the great crested newt ().大海捞针?环境DNA宏条形码技术与靶向定量聚合酶链反应检测大冠蝾螈的比较
Ecol Evol. 2018 May 29;8(12):6330-6341. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4013. eCollection 2018 Jun.
2
Living quarters of a living fossil-Uncovering the current distribution pattern of the rediscovered Hula painted frog (Latonia nigriventer) using environmental DNA.活化石的栖息地——利用环境 DNA 揭示重新发现的胡拉彩绘蛙(Latonia nigriventer)的当前分布模式。
Mol Ecol. 2017 Dec;26(24):6801-6812. doi: 10.1111/mec.14420. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
3
Improving herpetological surveys in eastern North America using the environmental DNA method.利用环境DNA方法改进北美东部的爬行动物学调查。
Genome. 2016 Nov;59(11):991-1007. doi: 10.1139/gen-2015-0218. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
4
Developmental programming modulates olfactory behavior in C. elegans via endogenous RNAi pathways.发育编程通过内源性RNAi途径调节秀丽隐杆线虫的嗅觉行为。
Elife. 2016 Jun 28;5:e11642. doi: 10.7554/eLife.11642.
5
I Environmental DNA sampling is more sensitive than a traditional survey technique for detecting an aquatic invader.一、环境DNA采样在检测水生入侵物种方面比传统调查技术更为灵敏。
Ecol Appl. 2015 Oct;25(7):1944-52. doi: 10.1890/14-1751.1.
6
MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species.MiFish,一组通用的鱼类环境 DNA metabarcoding PCR 引物:可检测 230 多种亚热带海洋物种。
R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Jul 22;2(7):150088. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150088. eCollection 2015 Jul.
7
Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding.利用环境DNA宏条形码技术对水生生物多样性进行下一代监测。
Mol Ecol. 2016 Feb;25(4):929-42. doi: 10.1111/mec.13428. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
8
Development and Validation of Environmental DNA (eDNA) Markers for Detection of Freshwater Turtles.用于检测淡水龟的环境DNA(eDNA)标记的开发与验证
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 22;10(7):e0130965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130965. eCollection 2015.
9
Quantification of mesocosm fish and amphibian species diversity via environmental DNA metabarcoding.通过环境DNA宏条形码技术对中宇宙鱼类和两栖动物物种多样性进行量化
Mol Ecol Resour. 2016 Jan;16(1):29-41. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12433. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
10
Persistence of DNA in carcasses, slime and avian feces may affect interpretation of environmental DNA data.尸体、黏液和鸟类粪便中DNA的持久性可能会影响对环境DNA数据的解读。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 17;9(11):e113346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113346. eCollection 2014.