• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2.0%(0.60mg/cm²)浓度的甲醛斑贴试验比 1.0%浓度的甲醛斑贴试验能检测出更多的甲醛接触过敏。

Patch Testing With Formaldehyde 2.0% (0.60 mg/cm2) Detects More Contact Allergy to Formaldehyde Than 1.0.

机构信息

From the Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmoe, Sweden.

Allergy Center and Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Republic University of Uruguay, Montevideo.

出版信息

Dermatitis. 2019 Nov/Dec;30(6):342-346. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000510.

DOI:10.1097/DER.0000000000000510
PMID:31730552
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Contact Dermatitis Research Group increased the patch test concentration of formaldehyde from 1.0% aqueous (aq) to 2.0% aq (in 2011).

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to investigate the outcome of the decision.

METHODS

Consecutive dermatitis patients in 8 different clinics were patch tested with formaldehyde 1.0% aq and 2.0% aq. The test solutions were applied with a micropipette to the filter paper discs in the respective chamber.

RESULTS

A total of 2778 patients were tested with 1.0% aq and 2766 to 2.0% aq. Sixty-five patients (2.3%, calculated from 2766 tested, to 2.0% aq) had positive patch test reactions interpreted as contact allergy to formaldehyde. This is a rather low frequency. Of these 65, 46 were women (46/1703 [2.7%]) and 19 were men (19/1063 [1.8%]). Thirty-six reacted only to 2.0% aq, 21 patients reacted to both concentrations, and 8 patients reacted only to 1.0% aq. Significantly, more patients reacted to 2.0% aq compared with 1.0% aq (P < 0.001). There was no significant sex difference. A total of 0.8% irritant reactions were recorded to formaldehyde 2.0% aq and 0.1% to 1.0% aq.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased formaldehyde patch test concentration to 2.0% aq revealed more formaldehyde contact allergy.

摘要

背景

国际接触性皮炎研究小组(International Contact Dermatitis Research Group)于 2011 年将甲醛的斑贴试验浓度从 1.0%水溶液(aq)增加到 2.0% aq。

目的

本研究旨在探讨这一决定的结果。

方法

在 8 家不同的诊所,连续的皮炎患者接受了 1.0% aq 和 2.0% aq 的甲醛斑贴试验。测试溶液通过微量移液器施加到相应腔室的滤纸片上。

结果

共有 2778 名患者接受了 1.0% aq 和 2766 至 2.0% aq 的测试。65 名患者(2.3%,从 2766 名测试者中计算得出,对 2.0% aq 呈阳性斑贴试验反应,解释为对甲醛的接触过敏)。这是一个相当低的频率。在这 65 名患者中,有 46 名是女性(46/1703 [2.7%]),19 名是男性(19/1063 [1.8%])。36 名患者仅对 2.0% aq 有反应,21 名患者对两种浓度均有反应,8 名患者仅对 1.0% aq 有反应。值得注意的是,与 1.0% aq 相比,更多的患者对 2.0% aq 有反应(P < 0.001)。对 2.0% aq 的甲醛记录了 0.8%的刺激性反应,对 1.0% aq 的记录了 0.1%。

结论

将甲醛斑贴试验浓度增加到 2.0% aq 揭示了更多的甲醛接触过敏。

相似文献

1
Patch Testing With Formaldehyde 2.0% (0.60 mg/cm2) Detects More Contact Allergy to Formaldehyde Than 1.0.2.0%(0.60mg/cm²)浓度的甲醛斑贴试验比 1.0%浓度的甲醛斑贴试验能检测出更多的甲醛接触过敏。
Dermatitis. 2019 Nov/Dec;30(6):342-346. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000510.
2
Routine diagnostic patch-testing with formaldehyde 2.0% (0.6 mg/cm2) may be an advantage compared to 1.0%.与 1.0%相比,用 2.0%(0.6mg/cm2)的甲醛进行常规诊断斑贴试验可能具有优势。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2010 Sep;90(5):480-4. doi: 10.2340/00015555-0925.
3
Formaldehyde.甲醛
Dermatitis. 2015 Jan-Feb;26(1):3-6. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000075.
4
Patch testing with methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone 200 ppm aq. detects significantly more contact allergy than 100 ppm. A multicentre study within the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group.含 200ppm 甲基氯异噻唑啉酮/甲基异噻唑啉酮的斑贴试验比含 100ppm 时检测出更多的接触过敏。欧洲环境与接触性皮炎研究组的一项多中心研究。
Contact Dermatitis. 2014 Jul;71(1):31-4. doi: 10.1111/cod.12241. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
5
Formaldehyde exposure and patterns of concomitant contact allergy to formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasers.甲醛暴露与同时接触甲醛和甲醛释放剂所致过敏反应的模式。
Contact Dermatitis. 2010 Jul;63(1):31-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01745.x.
6
Multicenter Patch Testing With Methylisothiazolinone and Methylchloroisothiazolinone/Methylisothiazolinone Within the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group.国际接触性皮炎研究组内使用甲基异噻唑啉酮和甲基氯异噻唑啉酮/甲基异噻唑啉酮的多中心斑贴试验
Dermatitis. 2017 May/Jun;28(3):210-214. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000272.
7
Multicenter Patch Testing With a Resol Resin Based on Phenol and Formaldehyde Within the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group.多中心斑贴试验用酚醛树脂 Resol 制剂,国际接触性皮炎研究组协作。
Dermatitis. 2015 Sep-Oct;26(5):230-4. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000137.
8
Recommendation to include formaldehyde 2.0% aqua in the European baseline patch test series.建议将 2.0%甲醛水剂纳入欧洲基本斑贴试验系列。
Contact Dermatitis. 2013 Dec;69(6):372-4. doi: 10.1111/cod.12148. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
9
Multicenter Patch Testing With Methylchloroisothizoline/Methylisothiazolinone in 100 and 200 ppm Within the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group.国际接触性皮炎研究组内进行的100ppm和200ppm甲基氯异噻唑啉酮/甲基异噻唑啉酮的多中心斑贴试验。
Dermatitis. 2017 May/Jun;28(3):215-218. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000287.
10
Formaldehyde 2% is not a useful means of detecting allergy to formaldehyde releasers- results of the ESSCA network, 2015-2018.2%甲醛不是检测甲醛释放体过敏的有用手段——2015-2018 年 ESSCA 网络研究结果。
Contact Dermatitis. 2021 Feb;84(2):95-102. doi: 10.1111/cod.13691. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Contact dermatitis associated with preservatives: Retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 1994 through 2016.接触性皮炎与防腐剂相关:1994 年至 2016 年北美接触性皮炎组数据的回顾性分析。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Apr;84(4):965-976. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.07.059. Epub 2021 Feb 9.