• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接触性皮炎与防腐剂相关:1994 年至 2016 年北美接触性皮炎组数据的回顾性分析。

Contact dermatitis associated with preservatives: Retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 1994 through 2016.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Apr;84(4):965-976. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.07.059. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.07.059
PMID:33579596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8087451/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preservatives are often necessary components of commercial products. Large-scale North American studies on preservative allergy are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate demographics, positive patch test reactions (PPTRs), clinical relevance, and trends for preservatives tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch testing results of preservatives from 1994 through 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 50,799 patients were tested; 11,338 (22.3%) had a PPTR to at least 1 preservative. The most frequent reactions were to methylisothiazolinone 0.2% aqueous (aq) (12.2%), formaldehyde 2% aq (7.8%), formaldehyde 1% aq (7.8%), quaternium-15 2% petrolatum (pet) (7.7%), and methyldibromo glutaronitrile/phenoxyethanol 2% pet (5.1%). Paraben mix 12% pet (1%), iodopropynyl butylcarbamate 0.1% pet (0.4%), benzyl alcohol 1% pet (0.3%), and phenoxyethanol 1% pet (0.2%) had the lowest PPTRs. Linear regression analysis of preservatives tested showed that only methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone 0.01% aq (parameter estimate, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.17-0.66; P < .005) had a significant increase in PPTRs over time.

LIMITATIONS

Collected variables are dependent on clinical judgment. Results may be prone to referral selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

This large North American study provides insight on preservative PPTRs and trends from 1994 through 2016.

摘要

背景

防腐剂通常是商业产品的必要成分。关于防腐剂过敏的大规模北美研究有限。

目的

评估北美接触性皮炎组织进行的防腐剂斑贴试验的人口统计学、阳性斑贴试验反应 (PPTR)、临床相关性和趋势。

方法

我们对 1994 年至 2016 年期间北美接触性皮炎组织的防腐剂斑贴试验结果进行了回顾性横断面分析。

结果

共有 50799 名患者接受了测试;11338 名(22.3%)至少对 1 种防腐剂有 PPTR。最常见的反应是对甲基异噻唑啉酮 0.2%水性(aq)(12.2%)、甲醛 2% aq(7.8%)、甲醛 1% aq(7.8%)、季铵盐-15 2%凡士林(pet)(7.7%)和甲基二溴戊二腈/苯氧乙醇 2% pet(5.1%)。对羟基苯甲酸酯混合物 12% pet(1%)、碘丙炔醇丁基氨甲酸酯 0.1% pet(0.4%)、苯甲醇 1% pet(0.3%)和苯氧乙醇 1% pet(0.2%)的 PPTR 最低。对测试的防腐剂进行线性回归分析显示,只有甲基氯异噻唑啉酮/甲基异噻唑啉酮 0.01% aq(参数估计值 0.42;95%置信区间 0.17-0.66;P<.005)的 PPTR 随时间显著增加。

局限性

收集的变量取决于临床判断。结果可能容易受到转诊选择偏倚的影响。

结论

这项大型的北美研究提供了 1994 年至 2016 年期间关于防腐剂 PPTR 和趋势的见解。

相似文献

1
Contact dermatitis associated with preservatives: Retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 1994 through 2016.接触性皮炎与防腐剂相关:1994 年至 2016 年北美接触性皮炎组数据的回顾性分析。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Apr;84(4):965-976. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.07.059. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
2
[Preservatives as important etiologic factors of allergic contact dermatitis].[防腐剂作为过敏性接触性皮炎的重要病因]
Med Pr. 2015;66(3):327-32. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00176.
3
Epidemic of Isothiazolinone Allergy in North America: Prevalence Data From the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2013-2014.北美异噻唑啉酮过敏流行情况:来自北美接触性皮炎研究组的患病率数据,2013 - 2014年
Dermatitis. 2017 May/Jun;28(3):204-209. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000288.
4
Positive patch-test reactions to iodopropynyl butylcarbamate: retrospective analysis of North American contact dermatitis group data, from 1998 to 2008.阳性斑贴试验反应至碘丙炔基丁基氨基甲酸酯:1998 年至 2008 年北美接触性皮炎组数据的回顾性分析。
Dermatitis. 2010 Nov-Dec;21(6):303-10.
5
Contact sensitivity to preservatives in Singapore: frequency of sensitization to 11 common preservatives 2006-2011.接触防腐剂引发的敏感性:2006 年至 2011 年新加坡对 11 种常见防腐剂的致敏频率。
Dermatitis. 2014 Mar-Apr;25(2):77-82. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000031.
6
Preservative contact allergy in occupational dermatitis: a machine learning analysis.职业性皮肤病中的防腐剂接触过敏:机器学习分析。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Jun 8;316(7):372. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03101-1.
7
Hand dermatitis in adults referred for patch testing: Analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 2000 to 2016.成人斑贴试验患者手部皮炎:2000 年至 2016 年北美接触性皮炎组数据分析。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Apr;84(4):989-999. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.11.054. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
8
Frequency of positive patch test reactions to preservatives: The Australian experience.防腐剂斑贴试验阳性反应的频率:澳大利亚的经验。
Australas J Dermatol. 2013 Feb;54(1):31-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2012.00958.x. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
9
Contact allergy to preservatives. Analysis of IVDK data 1996-2009.接触防腐剂过敏。IVDK 数据 1996-2009 分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2011 Jun;164(6):1316-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10253.x. Epub 2011 May 11.
10
North American contact dermatitis group patch test results: 2011-2012.北美接触性皮炎小组斑贴试验结果:2011 - 2012年
Dermatitis. 2015 Jan-Feb;26(1):49-59. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000097.

引用本文的文献

1
Recycling of Waste Bamboo Biomass and Papermaking Waste Liquid to Synthesize Sodium Lignosulfonate/Chitosan Glue-Free Biocomposite.回收废弃竹生物质与造纸废液以合成木质素磺酸钠/壳聚糖无胶生物复合材料
Molecules. 2023 Aug 15;28(16):6058. doi: 10.3390/molecules28166058.
2
Electrochemical sensing platform with gold nanoparticles capped by PDDA for benzyl alcohol determination.基于 PDDA 封端的金纳米粒子的电化学生物传感平台用于苯甲醇的测定。
Mikrochim Acta. 2023 Mar 6;190(4):115. doi: 10.1007/s00604-023-05690-6.
3
Preservatives in non-cosmetic products: Increasing human exposure requires action for protection of health.

本文引用的文献

1
Amended Safety Assessment of Parabens as Used in Cosmetics.化妆品用防腐剂的安全性评估修订版。
Int J Toxicol. 2020 Jul/Aug;39(1_suppl):5S-97S. doi: 10.1177/1091581820925001.
2
Patch Testing With Formaldehyde 2.0% (0.60 mg/cm2) Detects More Contact Allergy to Formaldehyde Than 1.0.2.0%(0.60mg/cm²)浓度的甲醛斑贴试验比 1.0%浓度的甲醛斑贴试验能检测出更多的甲醛接触过敏。
Dermatitis. 2019 Nov/Dec;30(6):342-346. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000510.
3
Trends in Patch Testing With the Mayo Clinic Standard Series, 2011-2015.2011-2015 年梅奥诊所标准系列斑贴试验的趋势。
非化妆品产品中的防腐剂:增加人类接触量,需要采取行动保护健康。
Contact Dermatitis. 2022 Nov;87(5):389-405. doi: 10.1111/cod.14181. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
Dermatitis. 2018 Nov/Dec;29(6):310-315. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000411.
4
North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results: 2015-2016.北美接触性皮炎组斑贴试验结果:2015-2016 年。
Dermatitis. 2018 Nov/Dec;29(6):297-309. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000417.
5
Ten-year trends in contact allergy to formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasers.十年间对甲醛和甲醛释放剂的接触过敏趋势。
Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Nov;79(5):263-269. doi: 10.1111/cod.13052. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
6
The methylisothiazolinone contact allergy epidemic in Australia.
Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Sep;79(3):189-191. doi: 10.1111/cod.13025. Epub 2018 May 15.
7
Undeclared formaldehyde levels in patient consumer products: formaldehyde test kit utility.患者消费品中未申报的甲醛含量:甲醛检测试剂盒的效用。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2019 Jun;38(2):112-117. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2018.1471485. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
8
Quaternium-15.
Int J Toxicol. 2017 Sep/Oct;36(5_suppl2):52S. doi: 10.1177/1091581817717643.
9
Allergic contact dermatitis in preservatives: current standing and future options.防腐剂所致变应性接触性皮炎:现状与未来选择
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Aug;17(4):263-268. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000373.
10
Methylisothiazolinone: the epidemic is declining - but not gone.
Contact Dermatitis. 2017 May;76(5):301-302. doi: 10.1111/cod.12750.