Rossi Vincent, Asher Anthony, Peters David, Zuckerman Scott L, Smith Mark, Henegar Martin, Dyer Hunter, Coric Domagoj, Pfortmiller Deborah, Adamson Tim, McGirt Matthew
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Nov 15;32(3):360-365. doi: 10.3171/2019.7.SPINE19480. Print 2020 Mar 1.
Several studies have demonstrated that anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery in the outpatient versus hospital setting provides improved efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and patient satisfaction without a compromise in safety or outcome. Recent anecdotal reports, however, have questioned whether outpatient ACDF surgery is safe in the > 65-year-old Medicare population. To date, no clinical study has assessed the safety of outpatient ACDF in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC), specifically in a Medicare population. The authors set out to analyze their 3-year experience with Medicare-enrolled patients undergoing ACDF surgery at a single ASC to determine its safety profile, perioperative care protocol, and associated outcomes.
A retrospective analysis of 119 consecutive patients > 65 years (Medicare-eligible) who underwent 1-, 2-, or 3-level ACDF at a single ASC from 2015 to 2018 (since Medicare payment approval) was conducted. All patients were in American Society of Anesthesiologists classes I-III. Postoperatively, patients were observed for a minimum of 4 hours in a recovery setting for the following factors: neck swelling, neurological status, ability to swallow solid food, and urination capacity. All patients received a multimodal pain management regimen prior to discharge home. Data were collected on patient demographics, comorbidities, operative details, and all perioperative and 90-day morbidity.
Complete data were available for all 119 consecutive Medicare-eligible patients, 97 (81.5%) of whom were actively enrolled in Medicare. One-, 2-, and 3-level ACDFs were performed in 103 (86.6%), 15 (12.6%), and 1 (0.8%) patients, respectively. No patients required return to the operating room for intervention within the 4-hour postanesthesia care unit observation window. No patients required transfer from the ASC to the hospital setting for further observation or intervention. Thirty-day adverse events were reported in 2.4% of cases, all of which resolved by 90 days after surgery. The incidence of 90-day hospital readmission was 1.7% (n = 2), with 1 patient (0.8%) requiring reoperation at the index level for deep infection. All-cause 90-day mortality was 0%.
An analysis of consecutive Medicare patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists classes I-III) who underwent mostly 1-level and some 2-level ACDFs in an ASC setting demonstrates that surgical complications occur at a low rate with a safety profile similar to that reported for both inpatient ACDF and patients younger than 65 years. In an effort to reduce cost and improve efficiency of care, surgeons can safely perform ACDF in the Medicare population in an ASC environment utilizing patient selection criteria and perioperative management similar to those reported here.
多项研究表明,门诊与住院环境下的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)在提高效率、成本效益和患者满意度的同时,并未影响安全性或手术效果。然而,近期的一些传闻报道对65岁以上医疗保险人群进行门诊ACDF手术的安全性提出了质疑。迄今为止,尚无临床研究评估在门诊手术中心(ASC)进行门诊手术中心)进行门诊ACDF手术的安全性,尤其是在医疗保险人群中的安全性。作者着手分析他们在单一ASC为参加医疗保险的患者进行ACDF手术的3年经验,以确定其安全性、围手术期护理方案及相关结果。
对2015年至2018年(自医疗保险支付获批以来)在单一ASC接受1、2或3节段ACDF手术的119例连续65岁以上(符合医疗保险资格)患者进行回顾性分析。所有患者均为美国麻醉医师协会I-III级。术后,在恢复环境中对患者进行至少4小时的观察,观察以下因素:颈部肿胀、神经状态、吞咽固体食物的能力和排尿能力。所有患者在出院前均接受多模式疼痛管理方案。收集患者人口统计学、合并症、手术细节以及所有围手术期和90天发病率的数据。
所有119例连续符合医疗保险资格的患者均有完整数据,其中97例(81.5%)积极参加医疗保险。分别有103例(86.6%)、15例(12.6%)和1例(0.8%)患者接受了1、2和3节段ACDF手术。在麻醉后护理单元观察的4小时内,无患者需要返回手术室进行干预。无患者需要从ASC转至医院进行进一步观察或干预。2.4%的病例报告了30天不良事件,所有这些事件在术后90天内均得到解决。90天再次入院率为1.7%(n = 2),1例患者(0.8%)因深部感染需要在原手术节段再次手术。90天全因死亡率为0%。
对在ASC环境中接受大多为1节段和部分2节段ACDF手术的连续医疗保险患者(美国麻醉医师协会I-III级)的分析表明,手术并发症发生率较低,其安全性与住院ACDF手术以及65岁以下患者报道的安全性相似。为了降低成本和提高护理效率,外科医生可以在ASC环境中,采用与本文报道相似的患者选择标准和围手术期管理方法,安全地为医疗保险人群进行ACDF手术。