Suppr超能文献

访谈还是邮寄问卷调查?关于女性产科服务体验的数据比较。

Interviews or postal questionnaires? Comparisons of data about women's experiences with maternity services.

作者信息

Cartwright A

机构信息

Institute for Social Studies in Medical Care, London.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 1988;66(1):172-89.

PMID:3173261
Abstract

Surveys by personal interview are often assumed to be superior to those conducted by mail questionnaire. An experimental study of experiences and attitudes of 800 newly delivered mothers revealed surprising advantages to postal surveys: they are cheaper, more easily repeatable, and minimize interviewer effects. While response rates differed, the quality of responses was similar, except between middle- and working-class mothers. Postal surveys can be used with considerable assurance in national studies of fairly intimate experiences of pregnancy and delivery.

摘要

人们通常认为通过个人访谈进行的调查比通过邮寄问卷进行的调查更具优势。一项针对800名刚分娩母亲的经历和态度的实验研究揭示了邮寄调查的惊人优势:它们成本更低、更容易重复进行,并且能将访谈者的影响降至最低。虽然回复率有所不同,但除了中产阶级和工人阶级母亲之间,回复的质量是相似的。在关于怀孕和分娩等相当私密经历的全国性研究中,可以相当放心地使用邮寄调查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验