• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从农民那里获取健康信息:新西兰一个案例研究中的访谈与邮寄问卷调查对比

Obtaining health information from farmers: interviews versus postal questionnaires in a New Zealand case study.

作者信息

Morgaine Kate C, Firth Hilda M, Herbison G Peter, Feyer Anne-Marie, McBride David I

机构信息

New Zealand Environmental and Occupational Health Research Centre, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, P O Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Ann Agric Environ Med. 2005;12(2):223-8.

PMID:16457477
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness of interviewer-led and postal surveys in gathering adequate health data for occupational health programmes among farmers.

METHODS

Two cross-sectional studies of farmers from southern New Zealand were conducted. Farms were randomly selected from the public land valuation roll and all farmers and farm workers invited to participate in the farmers' health study. First, 477 farms were invited to participate in an interviewer administered questionnaire and health check; and second, a further 432 farms were selected and invited to participate in a self-administered postal survey. Both groups completed the same questionnaire.

RESULTS

The response for the interviewer-led and postal surveys was 65.4 % and 51.6 % respectively. The 2 groups differed demographically, with fewer young farm workers in the postal survey, but were similar in all areas of health information collected, except that men in the interviewer-led survey were significantly more likely to have a psychological disturbance than men in the postal survey (chi ( 2 ) =5.06, df=1, p=0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the interviewer-led survey having a higher response rate, the postal survey produced similar health data, which is adequate for planning occupational health programmes for farmers. Extra effort should be made to recruit younger farm workers in future research.

摘要

目的

比较访谈式调查和邮寄式调查在为农民职业健康项目收集充分健康数据方面的有效性。

方法

对来自新西兰南部的农民进行了两项横断面研究。从公共土地评估名册中随机选取农场,邀请所有农民和农场工人参与农民健康研究。首先,邀请477个农场参与由访谈员管理的问卷调查和健康检查;其次,另外选取432个农场并邀请其参与自行填写的邮寄式调查。两组都完成相同的问卷。

结果

访谈式调查和邮寄式调查的回应率分别为65.4%和51.6%。两组在人口统计学特征上存在差异,邮寄式调查中的年轻农场工人较少,但在收集的所有健康信息领域都相似,只是访谈式调查中的男性比邮寄式调查中的男性患心理障碍的可能性显著更高(卡方检验(2)=5.06,自由度=1,p=0.024)。

结论

尽管访谈式调查的回应率较高,但邮寄式调查产生了相似的健康数据,这足以用于规划农民的职业健康项目。在未来的研究中应额外努力招募年轻的农场工人。

相似文献

1
Obtaining health information from farmers: interviews versus postal questionnaires in a New Zealand case study.从农民那里获取健康信息:新西兰一个案例研究中的访谈与邮寄问卷调查对比
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2005;12(2):223-8.
2
[General health in Icelandic farmers].[冰岛农民的总体健康状况]
Laeknabladid. 2009 Oct;95(10):655-9.
3
Interviews or postal questionnaires? Comparisons of data about women's experiences with maternity services.访谈还是邮寄问卷调查?关于女性产科服务体验的数据比较。
Milbank Q. 1988;66(1):172-89.
4
Skin symptoms and work-related skin symptoms among grape farmers in Crete, Greece.希腊克里特岛葡萄种植者的皮肤症状及与工作相关的皮肤症状
Am J Ind Med. 2006 Feb;49(2):77-84. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20247.
5
Lung health in Alberta farmers.阿尔伯塔省农民的肺部健康状况。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1999 Oct;3(10):913-9.
6
Acute and chronic disability among U.S. farmers and pesticide applicators: the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).美国农民和农药施用者中的急性和慢性残疾情况:国民健康访谈调查(NHIS)
J Agric Saf Health. 2004 Nov;10(4):275-85.
7
[Health profile of farmers--a study from Djursland].
Ugeskr Laeger. 1995 May 22;157(21):3046-9.
8
Training and other predictors of personal protective equipment use in Australian grain farmers using pesticides.澳大利亚使用农药的谷物种植农民的个人防护装备使用培训及其他预测因素。
Occup Environ Med. 2008 Feb;65(2):141-6. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.034843. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
9
Health of farmers in southland: an overview.南国农民的健康状况:概述
N Z Med J. 2001 Sep 28;114(1140):426-8.
10
Injury and illness costs in the Certified Safe Farm study.“认证安全农场”研究中的伤害与疾病成本。
J Rural Health. 2007 Autumn;23(4):348-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00103.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Recruitment and retention of farm owners and workers for a six-month prospective injury study in New Zealand: a feasibility study.新西兰一项为期六个月的前瞻性伤害研究的农场主和工人招募和保留:一项可行性研究。
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2011 May 25;6(1):16. doi: 10.1186/1745-6673-6-16.