• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神病学中的可委托专业活动:系统评价。

Entrustable Professional Activities in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

University Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Acad Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;44(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s40596-019-01142-7. Epub 2019 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1007/s40596-019-01142-7
PMID:31732885
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) represent discrete clinical tasks that can be entrusted to trainees in psychiatry. They are increasingly being used as educational framework in several countries. However, the empirical evidence available has not been synthesized in the field of psychiatry. Therefore, the authors conducted a systematic review in order to summarize and evaluate the available evidence in the field of EPAs in undergraduate and graduate medical education in psychiatry.

METHODS

The authors searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, ERIC, Embase, PsycINFO, all Ovid journals, Scopus, Web of Science, MedEdPORTAL, and the archives of Academic Psychiatry for articles reporting quantitative and qualitative research as well as educational case reports on EPAs in undergraduate and graduate psychiatry education published since 2005. All included articles were assessed for content (development, implementation, and assessment of EPAs) and quality using the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs.

RESULTS

The authors screened 2807 records and included a total of 20 articles in the final data extraction. Most studies were expert consensus reports (n = 6, 30%) and predominantly conducted in English-speaking countries (n = 17, 85%). Papers reported mainly EPA development and/or EPA implementation studies (n = 14, 70%), whereas EPA assessment studies were less frequent (n = 6, 30%). Publications per year showed an increasing trend both in quantity (from 1 in 2011 to 7 in 2018) and quality (from a QATSDD score of 27 in 2011 to an average score of 39 in 2018). The main focus of the articles was the development of individual EPAs for different levels of training for psychiatry or on curricular frameworks based on EPAs in psychiatry (n = 10, 50%). The lack of empirical controlled studies does currently not allow for meta-analyses of educational outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The concept of EPA-based curricula seems to become increasingly present, a focus in the specialty of psychiatry both in UME and GME. The lack of empirical research in this context is an important limitation for educational practice recommendations. Currently there is only preliminary but promising data available for using EPAs with regard to educational outcomes. EPAs seem to be effectively used from a curriculum design perspective for UME and GME in psychiatry.

摘要

目的

可委托的专业活动(EPAs)代表可以委托给精神病学学员的离散临床任务。它们越来越多地被用作几个国家的教育框架。然而,现有的实证证据尚未在精神病学领域得到综合。因此,作者进行了系统综述,以总结和评估精神病学本科和研究生医学教育中 EPA 的现有证据。

方法

作者检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、ERIC、Embase、PsycINFO、所有 Ovid 期刊、Scopus、Web of Science、MedEdPORTAL 和学术精神病学档案,以查找自 2005 年以来报告本科和研究生精神病学教育中 EPA 的定量和定性研究以及教育案例报告的文章。所有纳入的文章均使用多元化设计研究质量评估工具评估其内容(EPA 的开发、实施和评估)和质量。

结果

作者筛选了 2807 条记录,最终数据提取共纳入 20 篇文章。大多数研究是专家共识报告(n = 6,30%),主要来自英语国家(n = 17,85%)。论文主要报告了 EPA 开发和/或 EPA 实施研究(n = 14,70%),而 EPA 评估研究较少(n = 6,30%)。每年的出版物数量都呈现出增长趋势,无论是在数量(从 2011 年的 1 篇增加到 2018 年的 7 篇)还是在质量(从 2011 年的 QATSDD 评分 27 分提高到 2018 年的平均评分 39 分)方面。文章的主要重点是为精神病学的不同培训水平开发个别 EPA,或基于精神病学 EPA 的课程框架(n = 10,50%)。目前缺乏实证对照研究,不允许对教育成果进行荟萃分析。

结论

基于 EPA 的课程概念似乎越来越受到关注,无论是在本科还是研究生医学教育中,都是精神病学专业的重点。这种情况下缺乏实证研究是对教育实践建议的一个重要限制。目前,关于使用 EPA 对教育成果的影响,只有初步但有希望的数据。从课程设计的角度来看,EPA 似乎可以有效地用于精神病学的本科和研究生医学教育。

相似文献

1
Entrustable Professional Activities in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review.精神病学中的可委托专业活动:系统评价。
Acad Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;44(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s40596-019-01142-7. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
2
Working with entrustable professional activities in clinical education in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review.本科医学教育临床教学中委托专业活动的研究:一项范围综述
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02608-9.
3
A systematic review of 7 years of research on entrustable professional activities in graduate medical education, 2011-2018.一项对 2011 年至 2018 年研究生医学教育中可委托专业活动研究的 7 年系统回顾。
Med Educ. 2019 Mar;53(3):234-249. doi: 10.1111/medu.13792. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
4
Entrustable professional activities in health care education: a scoping review.医疗保健教育中的可委托专业活动:范围综述。
Med Educ. 2019 Aug;53(8):766-777. doi: 10.1111/medu.13879. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
5
The case for use of entrustable professional activities in undergraduate medical education.本科医学教育中使用可托付专业活动的理由。
Acad Med. 2015 Apr;90(4):431-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000586.
6
The Use of Entrustable Professional Activities in Pediatric Postgraduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review.可托付专业活动在儿科研究生医学教育中的应用:一项系统综述。
Acad Pediatr. 2022 Jan-Feb;22(1):21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.07.007. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
7
Assessing Entrustable Professional Activities During the Psychiatry Clerkship.评估精神科实习期间可托付的专业活动。
Acad Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;41(3):345-349. doi: 10.1007/s40596-017-0665-9. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
8
Evaluation of the Characteristics of a Workplace Assessment Form to Assess Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) in an Undergraduate Surgery Core Clerkship.评估本科外科核心实习中用于评估可托付专业活动(EPAs)的工作场所评估表的特征。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Sep-Oct;75(5):1211-1222. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
9
Entrustable professional activities in entry-level health professional education: A scoping review.入门级卫生专业教育中的可委托专业活动:范围综述。
Med Educ. 2021 Sep;55(9):1011-1032. doi: 10.1111/medu.14539. Epub 2021 May 6.
10
[Entrustable Professional Activities in Graduate Medical Education in Psychiatry: A Promising Concept].[精神病学研究生医学教育中的可托付专业活动:一个有前景的概念]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2021 Jan;110(1):30-36. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003601.

引用本文的文献

1
Importance-based approach to entrustable professional activities for psychiatric residency training.基于重要性的精神科住院医师培训可托付专业活动方法
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 17;25(1):1068. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07655-0.
2
Clinical Neurosciences Training for Psychiatry Residents: Implementing the Competency-Based Medical Education Framework.精神科住院医师的临床神经科学培训:实施基于能力的医学教育框架
Acad Psychiatry. 2025 May 1. doi: 10.1007/s40596-025-02145-3.
3
Is it the right time to promote competency-based European Training Requirements in Ophthalmology? A European Board of Ophthalmology survey.
现在是推广基于能力的欧洲眼科培训要求的合适时机吗?欧洲眼科委员会调查。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun;103(4):404-415. doi: 10.1111/aos.17433. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
4
Designing Entrustable Professional Activities for Treatment Planning of Oral Cancer by Maxillofacial Surgery Residents: A Modified Delphi Study.为口腔颌面外科住院医师设计口腔癌治疗计划的可托付专业活动:一项改良德尔菲研究
Int J Dent. 2024 Sep 14;2024:5516332. doi: 10.1155/2024/5516332. eCollection 2024.
5
Entrustable Professional Activities and Learning: The Postgraduate Trainee Perspective.可委托的专业活动与学习:研究生视角。
Acad Psychiatry. 2023 Apr;47(2):134-142. doi: 10.1007/s40596-022-01712-2. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
6
Psychiatry training for medical students: A global perspective and implications for India's competency-based medical education curriculum.医学生的精神病学培训:全球视角及对印度基于能力的医学教育课程的启示。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2022 May-Jun;64(3):240-251. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_187_22. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
7
Identifying entrustable professional activities for postgraduation in psychiatry: What should a psychiatrist be able to do?确定精神病学毕业后可委托的专业活动:精神科医生应该能够做什么?
Ind Psychiatry J. 2022 Jan-Jun;31(1):49-55. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_124_21. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
8
Developing entrustable professional activities for doctoral graduates in health professions education: obtaining a national consensus in Iran.发展卫生职业教育博士生的可委托专业活动:在伊朗获得全国共识。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jun 2;22(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03469-6.
9
Longitudinal training models for entrusting students with independent patient care?: A systematic review.委托学生独立进行患者护理的纵向培训模型?系统评价。
Med Educ. 2022 Feb;56(2):159-169. doi: 10.1111/medu.14607. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
10
Workplace-based assessments of entrustable professional activities in a psychiatry core clerkship: an observational study.精神科核心实习中基于工作场所的可托付专业活动评估:一项观察性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 21;21(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02637-4.