Suppr超能文献

交叉不平等与慢性风湿性疾病中的个体异质性:交叉多层次分析。

Intersectional Inequalities and Individual Heterogeneity in Chronic Rheumatic Diseases: An Intersectional Multilevel Analysis.

机构信息

Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Lund University, Lund, Sweden, and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Feb;73(2):296-304. doi: 10.1002/acr.24109.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine how intersections of multiple sociodemographic variables explain the individual heterogeneity in risk of being diagnosed with any of following chronic rheumatic diseases (CRDs): osteoarthritis (OA), gout, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or spondyloarthritis (SpA).

METHODS

We identified individuals ages 40-65 years residing in Skåne, Sweden by December 31, 2013 and having done so from January 1, 2000 (n = 342,542). We used a Skåne health care register to identify those with a diagnosis of the CRD of interest between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015, with no previous such diagnosis during 2000-2013. We created 144 intersectional social strata (ISS) using categories of age, sex, education, income, civil status, and immigration. For individuals nested within ISS, we applied multilevel logistic regression models to estimate the variance partition coefficient (VPC) as a measure of discriminatory accuracy of the ISS and the predicted absolute risks and 95% credible intervals for each stratum.

RESULTS

Overall, 3.5%, 0.5%, 0.2%, and 0.2% of the study population were diagnosed with OA, gout, RA, and SpA, respectively. The VPC ranged from 16.2% for gout to 0.5% for SpA. Sex explained the largest proportion of between-strata variation in risk of RA, gout, and SpA, while age was the most important factor for OA. The most between-strata differences in risk of these CRDs were due to the additive main effects.

CONCLUSION

Despite meaningful between-strata inequalities in the risk of being diagnosed with CRDs (except SpA), there were substantial within-strata heterogeneities that remain unexplained. There was limited evidence of intersectional interaction effects.

摘要

目的

探讨多个社会人口学变量的交叉如何解释个体在以下任何一种慢性风湿性疾病(CRD)诊断风险方面的异质性:骨关节炎(OA)、痛风、类风湿关节炎(RA)或脊柱关节炎(SpA)。

方法

我们通过截至 2013 年 12 月 31 日在瑞典斯科讷居住的年龄在 40-65 岁的个体,并于 2000 年 1 月 1 日开始(n=342542)进行识别。我们使用斯科讷医疗保健登记册来确定 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日之间有兴趣的 CRD 诊断的个体,在 2000-2013 年期间没有先前的此类诊断。我们使用年龄、性别、教育、收入、婚姻状况和移民类别创建了 144 个交叉社会阶层(ISS)。对于嵌套在 ISS 内的个体,我们应用多水平逻辑回归模型来估计方差分割系数(VPC)作为 ISS 区分准确性的度量,以及每个阶层的预测绝对风险和 95%可信区间。

结果

总体而言,3.5%、0.5%、0.2%和 0.2%的研究人群分别被诊断为 OA、痛风、RA 和 SpA。VPC 范围从痛风的 16.2%到 SpA 的 0.5%。性别解释了 RA、痛风和 SpA 风险的最大比例的阶层间差异,而年龄是 OA 的最重要因素。这些 CRD 的风险的最大阶层间差异归因于附加的主要效应。

结论

尽管 CRD 诊断风险存在明显的阶层间不平等(除 SpA 外),但仍存在大量未被解释的阶层内异质性。交叉交互作用的证据有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验