Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Department of Psychology & Brain and Mind Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 15;207:116359. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116359. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
The objective of this study was to investigate whether phonological processes measured through brain activation are crucial for the development of reading skill (i.e. scaffolding hypothesis) and/or whether learning to read words fine-tunes phonology in the brain (i.e. refinement hypothesis). We specifically looked at how different grain sizes in two brain regions implicated in phonological processing played a role in this bidirectional relation. According to the dual-stream model of speech processing and previous empirical studies, the posterior superior temporal gyrus (STG) appears to be a perceptual region associated with phonological representations, whereas the dorsal inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) appears to be an articulatory region that accesses phonological representations in STG during more difficult tasks. 36 children completed a reading test outside the scanner and an auditory phonological task which included both small (i.e. onset) and large (i.e. rhyme) grain size conditions inside the scanner when they were 5.5-6.5 years old (Time 1) and once again approximately 1.5 years later (Time 2). To study the scaffolding hypothesis, a regression analysis was carried out by entering brain activation in either STG or IFG for either small (onset > perceptual) or large (rhyme > perceptual) grain size phonological processing at T1 as the predictors and reading skill at T2 as the dependent measure, with several covariates of no interest included. To study the refinement hypothesis, the regression analysis included reading skill at T1 as the predictor and brain activation in either STG or IFG for either small or large grain size phonological processing at T2 as the dependent measures, with several covariates of no interest included. We found that only posterior STG, regardless of grain size, was predictive of reading gains. Parallel models with only behavioral accuracy were not significant. Taken together, our results suggest that the representational quality of phonology in temporal cortex is crucial for reading development. Moreover, our study provides neural evidence supporting the scaffolding hypothesis, suggesting that brain measures of phonology could be helpful in early identification of reading difficulties.
本研究旨在探究大脑激活所测量的语音过程是否对阅读技能的发展至关重要(即支架假说),以及学习阅读单词是否能使大脑中的语音更加精细(即精炼假说)。我们特别关注两个与语音处理相关的脑区中不同粒度的脑区在这种双向关系中所起的作用。根据言语处理的双通道模型和以前的实证研究,后上颞回(STG)似乎是一个与语音表征相关的感知区域,而背侧下额前回(IFG)似乎是一个在更困难的任务中访问 STG 中的语音表征的发音区域。36 名儿童在 5.5-6.5 岁时(T1)在扫描仪内完成了阅读测试和听觉语音任务,该任务包括小粒度(即音首)和大粒度(即韵脚)条件,并且在大约 1.5 年后(T2)再次进行。为了研究支架假说,我们进行了回归分析,将 T1 时 STG 或 IFG 中任何一种小粒度(音首>感知)或大粒度(韵脚>感知)语音处理的大脑激活作为预测因子,将 T2 时的阅读技能作为因变量,同时纳入了几个不感兴趣的协变量。为了研究精炼假说,回归分析将 T1 时的阅读技能作为预测因子,将 T2 时 STG 或 IFG 中任何一种小粒度或大粒度语音处理的大脑激活作为因变量,同时纳入了几个不感兴趣的协变量。我们发现,只有后颞上回(STG),无论粒度大小,都可以预测阅读成绩的提高。只包含行为准确性的平行模型并不显著。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,颞叶皮质中语音的表征质量对阅读发展至关重要。此外,我们的研究提供了支持支架假说的神经学证据,表明语音的大脑测量可能有助于早期识别阅读困难。