• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

掌侧锁定钢板(VLP)与外固定(EF)治疗桡骨远端冲模骨折的影像学及功能结果比较

Comparison of radiographic and functional results of die-punch fracture of distal radius between volar locking plating (VLP) and external fixation (EF).

作者信息

Zhou Yanqing, Zhu Yanbin, Zhang Xiong, Tian Dehu, Zhang Bing

机构信息

Department of Hand Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, People's Republic of China.

Key Laboratory of Biomechanics of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Nov 18;14(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1442-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-019-1442-0
PMID:31735162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6859611/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to investigate the radiographic and functional results of die-punch fracture of distal radius treated by volar locking plate (VLP) or external fixation (EF).

METHODS

Between January 2015 and June 2018, 87 patients who were treated with EF or VLP were included in this study. At postoperative 6 months and at least 12 months, radiographic and functional outcomes were evaluated, and compared between two groups using SPSS 21.0.

RESULTS

The follow-up period was 15.6 months in average, and at the mean 8.5 weeks bony union was achieved in all patients. At 6-month visit, patients in VLP group had significantly better wrist flexion (79.2° vs. 71.8°) and pronation (79.5° vs. 75.2°) than those in EF group, but the difference was non-significant at the last visit (> 12 months); as for other parameters, no significant differences were observed. No significant difference was found between both groups in term of volar tilt, radial inclination, radial height, ulnar variance, or Gartland-Werley score and DASH. The articular step-off was significantly greater in EF than VLP group (0.6 mm vs. 0.3 mm, p < 0.001). The overall incidence of complications seemed higher in EF group (25% vs. 14%), but not approaching to the statistical significance level.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with VLP fixation of die-punch fractures had better wrist flexion and pronation at 6-month visit and more favorable wrist joint congruence at the last visit, but ultimately their outcome was comparable with those treated by EF.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨采用掌侧锁定钢板(VLP)或外固定(EF)治疗桡骨远端冲模骨折的影像学和功能结果。

方法

2015年1月至2018年6月期间,87例接受EF或VLP治疗的患者纳入本研究。在术后6个月和至少12个月时,评估影像学和功能结果,并使用SPSS 21.0在两组之间进行比较。

结果

平均随访期为15.6个月,所有患者平均在8.5周时实现骨愈合。在6个月随访时,VLP组患者的腕关节屈曲(79.2°对71.8°)和旋前(79.5°对75.2°)明显优于EF组,但在最后一次随访(>12个月)时差异无统计学意义;至于其他参数,未观察到显著差异。两组在掌倾角、桡骨倾斜度、桡骨高度、尺骨变异、或Gartland-Werley评分和DASH方面无显著差异。EF组的关节台阶明显大于VLP组(0.6mm对0.3mm,p<0.001)。EF组并发症的总体发生率似乎更高(25%对14%),但未达到统计学显著性水平。

结论

采用VLP固定冲模骨折的患者在6个月随访时腕关节屈曲和旋前更好,在最后一次随访时腕关节的一致性更有利,但最终其结果与接受EF治疗的患者相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e09a/6859611/39b3ed4654b9/13018_2019_1442_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e09a/6859611/5c90a1d24911/13018_2019_1442_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e09a/6859611/39b3ed4654b9/13018_2019_1442_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e09a/6859611/5c90a1d24911/13018_2019_1442_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e09a/6859611/39b3ed4654b9/13018_2019_1442_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of radiographic and functional results of die-punch fracture of distal radius between volar locking plating (VLP) and external fixation (EF).掌侧锁定钢板(VLP)与外固定(EF)治疗桡骨远端冲模骨折的影像学及功能结果比较
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Nov 18;14(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1442-0.
2
Volar locking plate versus external fixation with optional additional K-wire for treatment of AO type C2/C3 fractures: a retrospective comparative study.掌侧锁定钢板与可选择附加克氏针的外固定治疗 AO 型 C2/C3 骨折:一项回顾性对比研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Aug 27;14(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1309-4.
3
Functional outcome of unstable distal radius fractures: ORIF with a volar fixed-angle tine plate versus external fixation.不稳定型桡骨远端骨折的功能预后:掌侧锁定钛板切开复位内固定术与外固定术的比较
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Mar;30(2):289-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.11.014.
4
Volar, Splitting, and Collapsed Type of Die-Punch Fracture Treated by Volar Locking Plate (VLP): A Retrospective Study.掌侧锁定钢板治疗掌侧劈裂塌陷型冲模骨折的回顾性研究
Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun;12(3):869-877. doi: 10.1111/os.12695. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
Volar locking plate (VLP) versus non-locking plate (NLP) in the treatment of die-punch fractures of the distal radius, an observational study.掌侧锁定钢板(VLP)与非锁定钢板(NLP)治疗桡骨远端撕脱骨折的疗效比较:一项观察性研究。
Int J Surg. 2016 Oct;34:142-147. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.527. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
6
Outcomes of volar locking plate (VLP) fixation for treatment of die-punch fracture of the distal radius: A retrospective single-surgeon study.掌侧锁定钢板(VLP)固定治疗桡骨远端冲模骨折的疗效:一项单术者回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(33):e16796. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016796.
7
[Clinical and radiological results after distal radius fracture: intramedullary locking nail versus volar locking plate osteosynthesis].桡骨远端骨折后采用髓内锁定钉与掌侧锁定钢板内固定的临床及影像学结果
Z Orthop Unfall. 2009 Sep-Oct;147(5):547-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1185582. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
8
Volar locking plates versus external fixation and adjuvant pin fixation in unstable distal radius fractures: a randomized, controlled study.不稳定型桡骨远端骨折中掌侧锁定钢板与外固定及辅助钢针固定的比较:一项随机对照研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Aug;38(8):1469-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.04.039.
9
Surgical options for distal radius fractures of type C in elderly patients over 65 years old: a comparison of external fixation with Kirschner wires and volar locking plate.老年患者(年龄>65 岁)C 型桡骨远端骨折的手术治疗选择:外固定架联合克氏针与掌侧锁定钢板的比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Sep 9;18(1):669. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04162-0.
10
Analysis of the complications of palmar plating versus external fixation for fractures of the distal radius.桡骨远端骨折掌侧钢板固定与外固定并发症的分析
J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Oct;36(10):1614-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.06.030. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel external fixation for treating tibial fractures: a finite element and biomechanical study.一种用于治疗胫骨骨折的新型外固定架:有限元与生物力学研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Mar 28;20(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05681-8.
2
Clinical application of multi-direction temporary Kapandji technique and volar locking plate fixation for type C distal radius fractures.多方向临时卡潘迪技术联合掌侧锁定钢板固定治疗C型桡骨远端骨折的临床应用
BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 21;24(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02725-4.
3
Factors predicting complications following open reduction and internal fixation of intra-articular distal radius fracture.

本文引用的文献

1
The Irisin Hormone Profile and Expression in Human Bone Tissue in the Bone Healing Process in Patients.人骨组织中骨愈合过程中鸢尾素激素谱及表达
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Sep 4;23:4278-4283. doi: 10.12659/msm.906293.
2
Comparative study of type B distal radius fractures with and without lunate facet involvement treated by volar locking plate, an observational study.掌侧锁定板治疗伴或不伴月骨面受累的 B 型远端桡骨骨折的对比研究,一项观察性研究。
Int J Surg. 2017 Aug;44:317-323. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.07.040. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
3
National incidence of traumatic fractures in China: a retrospective survey of 512 187 individuals.
桡骨远端关节内骨折切开复位内固定术后并发症的预测因素。
Front Surg. 2024 Mar 22;11:1356121. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1356121. eCollection 2024.
4
Comparison of Sociodemographic and Radiographic Features in Distal Radio Fracture Treatment: Hand Surgeons versus Non-specialists.桡骨远端骨折治疗中社会人口统计学和影像学特征的比较:手外科医生与非专科医生
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024 Mar 21;59(1):e46-e53. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776017. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Open Reduction and Plate Fixation, External Fixator, and Conservative Treatment for Intra-articular Distal Radius Fractures.桡骨远端关节内骨折的切开复位钢板固定、外固定架及保守治疗
Cureus. 2024 Jan 10;16(1):e52014. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52014. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Various Treatment Options for Distal Radius Fractures.桡骨远端骨折不同治疗方案的成本效益分析
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2022 Dec 28;5(2):169-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.11.007. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Efficacy of electroacupuncture in assisting postoperative healing of distal radius fractures: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.电针辅助治疗桡骨远端骨折术后愈合的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Dec 1;17(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03415-8.
8
Interventions for Distal Radius Fractures: A Meta-analysis of Comparison Studies.桡骨远端骨折的干预措施:比较研究的荟萃分析
J Wrist Surg. 2021 Oct;10(5):440-457. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723793. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
中国创伤性骨折的国家发病率:对 512187 人的回顾性调查。
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Aug;5(8):e807-e817. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30222-X. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
4
Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly.老年人桡骨远端骨折
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Mar;25(3):179-187. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00676.
5
Clinical and radiologic factors affecting functional outcomes after volar locking plate fixation of dorsal angulated distal radius fractures.影响背侧成角型桡骨远端骨折掌侧锁定钢板固定术后功能预后的临床及影像学因素。
J Orthop Sci. 2016 Sep;21(5):619-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
6
Epidemiology of distal radius fractures and factors predicting risk and prognosis.桡骨远端骨折的流行病学及预测风险和预后的因素。
J Hand Ther. 2016 Apr-Jun;29(2):136-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2016.03.003.
7
The use of a single volar locking plate for AO C3-type distal radius fractures.使用单一掌侧锁定钢板治疗AO C3型桡骨远端骨折。
Hand (N Y). 2015 Dec;10(4):649-53. doi: 10.1007/s11552-015-9757-8. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
8
Is it really necessary to restore radial anatomic parameters after distal radius fractures?桡骨远端骨折后真的有必要恢复桡骨解剖参数吗?
Injury. 2014 Dec;45 Suppl 6:S21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.018. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
9
Complications after volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures.桡骨远端骨折掌侧锁定钢板固定术后的并发症
Injury. 2014 Mar;45(3):528-33. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
10
Characteristics of two different locking compression plates in the volar fixation of complex articular distal radius fractures.两种不同锁定加压接骨板在复杂关节内桡骨远端骨折掌侧固定中的特点。
Bone Joint Res. 2012 Jun 1;1(6):111-7. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.16.2000008. Print 2012 Jun.