Suppr超能文献

桡骨远端骨折的干预措施:比较研究的荟萃分析

Interventions for Distal Radius Fractures: A Meta-analysis of Comparison Studies.

作者信息

Beyer Julia, Wynkoop Emily, Liu Jiayong, Ebraheim Nabil A

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio.

出版信息

J Wrist Surg. 2021 Oct;10(5):440-457. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723793. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

Abstract

Distal radius fractures are one of the most frequent orthopaedic injuries. There are many effective treatment methods, such as volar plate, dorsal plate, percutaneous pins, external fixation, and casting; however, comparison of the treatment outcomes has not been thoroughly investigated. Our purpose is to determine if volar plating is the superior treatment method for distal radius fractures. We will address this through the following questions: First, is volar plating superior to dorsal plating, percutaneous pins, external fixation, or casting in terms of reported complications? Second, does volar plating produce superior functional outcomes to dorsal plating, percutaneous pins, external fixation, or casting? Third, are the radiographic outcomes superior for volar plating when compared with dorsal plating, percutaneous pins, external fixation, or casting?  MEDLINE, Academic Search Ultimate, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Plus, and JSTOR databases, as well as manual search, were used to identify papers comparing complications and functional results of volar plating to other treatment methods for distal radius fractures published after the year 2000. Complication data and function scores were recorded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and data was analyzed for meta-analysis using Cochrane ReviewManager software.  Compared with dorsal plate, volar plate performed significantly better in Gartland and Werley score. Volar plating outperformed percutaneous pins for loss of reduction, infection, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and ulnar deviation. Loss of reduction, malunion, Patient Related Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, DASH score, grip strength, ulnar deviation, and supination were significantly better for volar plating when compared with casting. When compared with external fixation, volar plating had significantly less cases of infection, lower QuickDASH score, and higher range of motion for flexion, pronation, and supination. All other complication and functional outcomes were not significantly different.  Distal radius fractures treated with volar plating showed relatively better measures of complications, function scores, and range of motion than other treatment methods; however, there was no significant difference in healing time when compared with percutaneous pins. More studies are needed to compare the rest of the treatment methods with each other.

摘要

桡骨远端骨折是最常见的骨科损伤之一。有许多有效的治疗方法,如掌侧钢板、背侧钢板、经皮克氏针、外固定和石膏固定;然而,对这些治疗结果的比较尚未得到充分研究。我们的目的是确定掌侧钢板固定是否是治疗桡骨远端骨折的最佳方法。我们将通过以下问题来探讨:第一,就报道的并发症而言,掌侧钢板固定是否优于背侧钢板固定、经皮克氏针、外固定或石膏固定?第二,掌侧钢板固定在功能结果上是否优于背侧钢板固定、经皮克氏针、外固定或石膏固定?第三,与背侧钢板固定、经皮克氏针、外固定或石膏固定相比,掌侧钢板固定的影像学结果是否更优?使用MEDLINE、Academic Search Ultimate、Academic Search Complete、CINAHL Plus和JSTOR数据库,以及手工检索,来识别2000年后发表的比较掌侧钢板固定与其他治疗桡骨远端骨折方法的并发症和功能结果的论文。记录并发症数据和功能评分。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险,并使用Cochrane ReviewManager软件对数据进行荟萃分析。与背侧钢板相比,掌侧钢板在Gartland和Werley评分中表现明显更好。在复位丢失、感染、上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分以及尺偏方面,掌侧钢板固定优于经皮克氏针。与石膏固定相比,掌侧钢板固定在复位丢失、畸形愈合、患者相关腕关节评估(PRWE)评分、DASH评分、握力、尺偏和旋后方面明显更好。与外固定相比,掌侧钢板固定的感染病例明显更少,QuickDASH评分更低,屈伸、旋前和旋后的活动范围更大。所有其他并发症和功能结果没有显著差异。与其他治疗方法相比,采用掌侧钢板固定治疗的桡骨远端骨折在并发症、功能评分和活动范围方面表现相对较好;然而,与经皮克氏针相比,愈合时间没有显著差异。需要更多研究来相互比较其他治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Interventions for Distal Radius Fractures: A Meta-analysis of Comparison Studies.
J Wrist Surg. 2021 Oct;10(5):440-457. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723793. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
2
Volar versus dorsal plating in the management of intra-articular distal radius fractures.
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Jan;31(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.09.011.
3
Analysis of the complications of palmar plating versus external fixation for fractures of the distal radius.
J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Oct;36(10):1614-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.06.030. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
5
Volar Locking Plate Compared With Combined Plating of AO Type C Distal Radius Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Study of 150 Cases.
J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Sep;47(9):813-822. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.04.018. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
9
10

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the biomechanical performance of Ti6Al4V volar plates in patients with distal radius fractures.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Feb 27;11:1141790. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1141790. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

5
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验