Smith Adrian J, Lilley Elliot
Norecopa, c/o Norwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 750 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo, Norway.
Science Group, Research Animals Department, RSPCA, Wilberforce Way, Southwater, West Sussex RH13 9RS, UK.
Animals (Basel). 2019 Nov 14;9(11):975. doi: 10.3390/ani9110975.
Training in the design of animal experiments focuses all too often on those aspects which can be approached mathematically, such as the number of animals needed to deliver a robust result, allocation of group size, and techniques such as randomization, blocking and statistical analysis. Important as they are, these are only a small part of the process of planning animal experiments. Additional key elements include refinements of housing, husbandry and procedures, health and safety, and attention at all stages to animal welfare. Advances in technology and laboratory animal science have led to improvements in care and husbandry, better provision of anesthetics and analgesics, refined methods of drug administration, greater competence in welfare assessment and application of humane endpoints. These improvements require continual dialogue between scientists, facility managers and technical staff, a practice that is a key feature of what has become known as the culture of care. This embodies a commitment to improving animal welfare, scientific quality, staff care and transparency for all stakeholders. Attention to both the physical and mental health of all those directly or indirectly involved in animal research is now an important part of the process of planning and conducting animal experiments. Efforts during the last 30 years to increase the internal and external validity of animal experiments have tended to concentrate on the production of guidelines to improve the quality of animal experiments, rather than for them. Recently, comprehensive guidelines for animal studies have been published, to redress this imbalance. These will be described in this paper. Endorsement of this overarching influence of the Three R concept, by all the stakeholders, will not only reduce animal numbers and improve animal welfare, but also lead to more reliable and reproducible research which should improve translation of pre-clinical studies into tangible clinical benefit.
动物实验设计方面的培训往往过于关注那些可以用数学方法处理的方面,比如获得可靠结果所需的动物数量、组间规模分配,以及随机化、区组设计和统计分析等技术。尽管这些方面很重要,但它们只是动物实验规划过程的一小部分。其他关键要素还包括饲养环境、饲养管理和实验程序的优化,健康与安全,以及在所有阶段对动物福利的关注。技术和实验动物科学的进步带来了饲养管理的改善、麻醉剂和镇痛药供应的优化、给药方法的改进、福利评估能力的提升以及人道终点的应用。这些改进需要科学家、设施管理人员和技术人员之间持续对话,这种做法是被称为关爱文化的一个关键特征。这体现了对改善动物福利、科研质量、员工关怀以及对所有利益相关者透明度的承诺。关注所有直接或间接参与动物研究人员的身心健康,如今已成为动物实验规划和实施过程的重要组成部分。在过去30年里,为提高动物实验的内部和外部有效性所做的努力往往集中在制定提高动物实验质量的指南上,而不是为了动物。最近,已发布了全面的动物研究指南,以纠正这种不平衡。本文将对此进行描述。所有利益相关者对“3R”概念这一总体影响的认可,不仅会减少动物数量、改善动物福利,还会带来更可靠、可重复的研究,这应该会促进临床前研究转化为切实的临床益处。