• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜子宫切除术实施后并发症减少:2004 年至 2018 年丹麦微创良性妇科手术的基于人群队列研究。

Reduced Complications Following Implementation of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Danish Population-based Cohort Study of Minimally Invasive Benign Gynecologic Surgery between 2004 and 2018.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, North Zealand University Hospital, Hilleroed (Drs. Settnes, Topsoee, and Norrbom); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus (Drs. Moeller and Dueholm); The Danish Clinical Registries (RKKP), Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg (Drs. Kopp and Froeslev); Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (Drs. Rasmussen and Dreisler); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg (Dr. Joergensen); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde (Dr. Gimbel), Denmark.

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, North Zealand University Hospital, Hilleroed (Drs. Settnes, Topsoee, and Norrbom); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus (Drs. Moeller and Dueholm); The Danish Clinical Registries (RKKP), Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg (Drs. Kopp and Froeslev); Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (Drs. Rasmussen and Dreisler); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg (Dr. Joergensen); Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde (Dr. Gimbel), Denmark.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep-Oct;27(6):1344-1353.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.005
PMID:31740432
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To monitor and report nationwide changes in the rates of and complications after different methods for benign hysterectomy, operative hysteroscopy, myomectomy, and embolization in Denmark. To report the national mortality after benign hysterectomy DESIGN: National prospective, observational cohort study.

SETTING

The Danish Hysterectomy and Hysteroscopy Database.

PATIENTS

Women undergoing surgery for benign gynecologic diseases: 64 818 hysterectomies, 84 175 hysteroscopies, 4016 myomectomies, and 1209 embolizations in Denmark between 2004 and 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

National meetings with representatives from all departments, annual working reports of institutional complication rates, workshops, and national guideline initiative to improve minimally invasive surgical methods.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Rates of the different methods and complications after each method with follow-up to 5 years as recorded by the database directly in the National Patient Registry. Nationwide, a decline in the use of hysterectomy, myomectomy, embolizations, and endometrial ablation. The total short-term complications were 9.8%, 7.5%, 8.9%, and 2.7% respectively, however, with a persistent risk of approximately 20% for recurrent operations within 5 years after endometrial ablation. Initially, we urged for increased use of vaginal hysterectomy, but only reached 36%. From 2010, we urged for reducing abdominal hysterectomies by implementing laparoscopic hysterectomy and reached 72% laparoscopic and robotic procedures. Since 2015, we used coring or contained morcellation for removal of large uterus at laparoscopic hysterectomy. The major and minor complication rates (modified Clavien-Dindo classification) were reduced significantly from 8.1% to 4.1% and 9.9% to 5.7% respectively. Mortality after benign hysterectomy was 0.27‰. The odds ratio for major complications after abdominal hysterectomy was 1.66 (1.52-1.81) compared to minimally invasive hysterectomy independent of the length of stay, high-volume departments, indications, comorbidity, age, and calendar year.

CONCLUSION

Fifteen years with a national database has resulted in a marked quality improvement. Denmark has 85% minimally invasive hysterectomies and has reduced the number of major complications by 50%.

摘要

研究目的

监测和报告丹麦不同良性子宫切除术、手术性宫腔镜检查、子宫肌瘤切除术和栓塞术方法的发生率和并发症变化,并报告良性子宫切除术的全国死亡率。

设计

全国前瞻性观察队列研究。

地点

丹麦子宫切除术和宫腔镜检查数据库。

患者

2004 年至 2018 年期间,在丹麦接受良性妇科疾病手术的女性:64818 例子宫切除术、84175 例宫腔镜检查、4016 例子宫肌瘤切除术和 1209 例栓塞术。

干预措施

全国各部门代表会议、机构并发症发生率年度工作报告、研讨会以及国家指南倡议,以改善微创外科方法。

测量和主要结果

数据库直接在国家患者登记处记录了不同方法的使用率和每种方法后的并发症,并进行了 5 年的随访。全国范围内,子宫切除术、子宫肌瘤切除术、栓塞术和子宫内膜消融术的使用率下降。总的短期并发症分别为 9.8%、7.5%、8.9%和 2.7%,然而,子宫内膜消融术后 5 年内再次手术的风险仍约为 20%。最初,我们敦促增加阴道子宫切除术的使用,但仅达到 36%。从 2010 年开始,我们通过实施腹腔镜子宫切除术来减少腹部子宫切除术,并达到 72%的腹腔镜和机器人手术。自 2015 年以来,我们在腹腔镜子宫切除术时使用去核或包含的旋切术来切除大子宫。主要和次要并发症发生率(改良 Clavien-Dindo 分类)显著从 8.1%降至 4.1%和 9.9%降至 5.7%。良性子宫切除术的死亡率为 0.27‰。与微创手术相比,腹部子宫切除术的主要并发症发生率比为 1.66(1.52-1.81),与住院时间、高容量科室、适应证、合并症、年龄和日历年份无关。

结论

15 年来,全国数据库的建立取得了显著的质量改善。丹麦 85%的子宫切除术采用微创方法,主要并发症减少了 50%。

相似文献

1
Reduced Complications Following Implementation of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Danish Population-based Cohort Study of Minimally Invasive Benign Gynecologic Surgery between 2004 and 2018.腹腔镜子宫切除术实施后并发症减少:2004 年至 2018 年丹麦微创良性妇科手术的基于人群队列研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep-Oct;27(6):1344-1353.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
2
Vesicoureteral Injury during Benign Hysterectomy: Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic Surgery versus Laparotomy.良性子宫切除术中的输尿管损伤:微创腹腔镜手术与剖腹手术比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep-Oct;27(6):1354-1362. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
3
Risk of Bowel Obstruction After Hysterectomy for Benign Indication According to Surgical Method in Denmark, 1984-2013.丹麦 1984-2013 年良性指征子宫切除术术后肠梗阻风险与手术方法相关。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024 Oct;31(10):855-869.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.06.010. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
4
Practice Patterns and Complications of Benign Hysterectomy Following the FDA Statement Warning Against the Use of Power Morcellation.在 FDA 发布禁止使用电动组织粉碎器的声明后,良性子宫切除术的实践模式和并发症。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Jun 20;153(6):e180141. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0141.
5
Hospital variation in responses to safety warnings about power morcellation in hysterectomy.医院对子宫切除术电切术中安全警告的反应存在差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;224(6):589.e1-589.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.1207. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
6
Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.基于同期子宫切除术入路的微创骶骨阴道固定术的围手术期结局:国家手术质量改进计划数据库的二次分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 May-Jun;27(4):953-958. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
7
Patient, surgeon, and hospital disparities associated with benign hysterectomy approach and perioperative complications.与良性子宫切除术术式及围手术期并发症相关的患者、外科医生和医院差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):497.e1-497.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.020. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
8
Complications after benign hysterectomy, according to procedure: a population-based prospective cohort study from the Danish hysterectomy database, 2004-2015.良性子宫切除术的并发症:基于人群的丹麦子宫切除术数据库前瞻性队列研究,2004-2015 年。
BJOG. 2020 Sep;127(10):1269-1279. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16200. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
9
The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.手术医生手术量对大子宫行微创子宫切除术的围手术期不良事件的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):490.e1-490.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
10
Minimizing Risks in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Rates of Surgical Site Infection Across Subtypes of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.微创手术中的风险最小化:各种腹腔镜子宫切除术类型的手术部位感染率。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep-Oct;27(6):1370-1376.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.10.015. Epub 2019 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Telehealth vs Clinic Postoperative Visit After Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.子宫切除术后远程医疗与门诊术后随访的随机对照试验
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06070-9.
2
Initial Outcomes and Methodologies of a Novel Single-Port Robotic Surgery in Gynecology.新型单孔机器人妇科手术的初步结果与方法
JSLS. 2024 Oct-Dec;28(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00047. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
3
Access to Hysterectomy-What Is the Realistic Rate for Pure Vaginal Hysterectomy? A Single-Center Prospective Observational Study.
子宫切除术的可及性——单纯经阴道子宫切除术的实际比例是多少?一项单中心前瞻性观察性研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 15;13(20):6130. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206130.
4
Trends in surgical approach to hysterectomy and perioperative outcomes in Michigan hospitals from 2010 through 2020.2010 年至 2020 年密歇根州医院子宫切除术手术方式和围手术期结局的变化趋势。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2211-2220. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01631-w. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
5
Indications and surgical route for hysterectomy for benign disorders: a retrospective analysis in a large Australian tertiary hospital network.良性疾病子宫切除术的适应证和手术途径:澳大利亚大型三级医院网络的回顾性分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Dec;306(6):2027-2033. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06736-5. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
6
The Role of Hysterectomy in Modern Gynaecological Surgery.子宫切除术在现代妇科手术中的作用
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jun 24;2022:9847163. doi: 10.1155/2022/9847163. eCollection 2022.
7
Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications-surgical volume matters: a retrospective cohort study comparing complications of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomies.经阴道微创手术治疗良性疾病-手术量很重要:一项比较机器人辅助腹腔镜和传统腹腔镜子宫切除术并发症的回顾性队列研究。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Oct;16(5):1199-1207. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01340-2. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
8
Trends in Hysterectomy Incidence Rates During 2000-2015 in Denmark: Shifting from Abdominal to Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures.2000 - 2015年丹麦子宫切除术发病率趋势:从腹部手术向微创手术转变
Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun 1;13:407-416. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S300394. eCollection 2021.
9
Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Have We Learned from a Decade?良性指征的机器人子宫切除术:十年间我们学到了什么?
JSLS. 2021 Jan-Mar;25(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00091.
10
Regional variation of hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases in Switzerland.瑞士良性子宫疾病子宫切除术的地域差异。
PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0233082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233082. eCollection 2020.