Mehta Ambar, Xu Tim, Hutfless Susan, Makary Martin A, Sinno Abdulrahman K, Tanner Edward J, Stone Rebecca L, Wang Karen, Fader Amanda N
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):497.e1-497.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.020. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
Hysterectomy is among the most common major surgical procedures performed in women. Approximately 450,000 hysterectomy procedures are performed each year in the United States for benign indications. However, little is known regarding contemporary US hysterectomy trends for women with benign disease with respect to operative technique and perioperative complications, and the association between these 2 factors with patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics.
We sought to describe contemporary hysterectomy trends and explore associations between patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics with surgical approach and perioperative complications.
Hysterectomies performed for benign indications by general gynecologists from July 2012 through September 2014 were analyzed in the all-payer Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database. We excluded hysterectomies performed by gynecologic oncologists, reproductive endocrinologists, and female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgeons. We included both open hysterectomies and those performed by minimally invasive surgery, which included vaginal hysterectomies. Perioperative complications were defined using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality patient safety indicators. Surgeon hysterectomy volume during the 2-year study period was analyzed (0-5 cases annually = very low, 6-10 = low, 11-20 = medium, and ≥21 = high). We utilized logistic regression and negative binomial regression to identify patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics associated with minimally invasive surgery utilization and perioperative complications, respectively.
A total of 5660 hospitalizations were identified during the study period. Most patients (61.5%) had an open hysterectomy; 38.5% underwent a minimally invasive surgery procedure (25.1% robotic, 46.6% laparoscopic, 28.3% vaginal). Most surgeons (68.2%) were very low- or low-volume surgeons. Factors associated with a lower likelihood of undergoing minimally invasive surgery included older patient age (reference 45-64 years; 20-44 years: adjusted odds ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.28), black race (reference white; adjusted odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.78), Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.80), smaller hospital (reference large; small: adjusted odds ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.45; medium: adjusted odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.96), medium hospital hysterectomy volume (reference ≥200 hysterectomies; 100-200: adjusted odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.87), and medium vs high surgeon volume (reference high; medium: adjusted odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.97). Complications occurred in 25.8% of open and 8.2% of minimally invasive hysterectomies (P < .0001). Minimally invasive hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.27) and large hysterectomy volume hospitals (reference ≥200 hysterectomies; 1-100: adjusted odds ratio, 2.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-3.20; 101-200: adjusted odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.16) were associated with fewer complications, while patient payer, including Medicare (reference private; adjusted odds ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-2.61), Medicaid (adjusted odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.04), and self-pay status (adjusted odds ratio, 2.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-4.12), and very-low and low surgeon hysterectomy volume (reference ≥21 cases; 1-5 cases: adjusted odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-2.47; 6-10 cases: adjusted odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.23) were associated with perioperative complications.
Use of minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications remains variable, with most patients undergoing open, more morbid procedures. Older and black patients and smaller hospitals are associated with open hysterectomy. Patient race and payer status, hysterectomy approach, and surgeon volume were associated with perioperative complications. Hysterectomies performed for benign indications by high-volume surgeons or by minimally invasive techniques may represent an opportunity to reduce preventable harm.
子宫切除术是女性中最常见的大型外科手术之一。在美国,每年约有45万例子宫切除术是出于良性指征进行的。然而,对于当代美国患有良性疾病的女性子宫切除术在手术技术和围手术期并发症方面的趋势,以及这两个因素与患者、外科医生和医院特征之间的关联,人们了解甚少。
我们试图描述当代子宫切除术的趋势,并探讨患者、外科医生和医院特征与手术方式及围手术期并发症之间的关联。
在全付费的马里兰州医疗服务成本审查委员会数据库中,分析了2012年7月至2014年9月期间普通妇科医生为良性指征实施的子宫切除术。我们排除了妇科肿瘤学家、生殖内分泌学家以及女性盆底医学和重建外科医生所做的子宫切除术。我们纳入了开放式子宫切除术和通过微创手术进行的子宫切除术,其中包括阴道子宫切除术。围手术期并发症采用医疗保健研究与质量机构的患者安全指标来定义。分析了2年研究期间外科医生的子宫切除量(每年0 - 5例 = 极低,6 - 10例 = 低,11 - 20例 = 中等,≥21例 = 高)。我们利用逻辑回归和负二项回归分别确定与微创手术使用和围手术期并发症相关的患者、外科医生和医院特征。
在研究期间共确定了5660例住院病例。大多数患者(61.5%)接受了开放式子宫切除术;38.5%接受了微创手术(25.1%为机器人手术,46.6%为腹腔镜手术,28.3%为阴道手术)。大多数外科医生(68.2%)是极低或低手术量的外科医生。与接受微创手术可能性较低相关的因素包括患者年龄较大(参照45 - 64岁;20 - 44岁:调整后的优势比为1.16;95%置信区间为1.05 - 1.28)、黑人种族(参照白人;调整后的优势比为0.70;95%置信区间为0.63 - 0.78)、西班牙裔(调整后的优势比为0.62;95%置信区间为0.48 - 0.80)、规模较小的医院(参照大型;小型:调整后的优势比为0.26;95%置信区间为0.15 - 0.45;中型:调整后的优势比为0.87;95%置信区间为0.79 - 0.96)、中型医院子宫切除量(参照≥200例子宫切除术;100 - 200例:调整后的优势比为0.78;95%置信区间为0.71 - 0.87)以及外科医生手术量为中等与高手术量相比(参照高手术量;中等手术量:调整后的优势比为0.87;95%置信区间为0.78 - 0.97)。开放式子宫切除术中25.8%发生了并发症,微创手术中8.2%发生了并发症(P <.0001)。微创手术(调整后的优势比为0.22;95%置信区间为0.17 - 0.27)以及子宫切除量高的医院(参照≥200例子宫切除术;1 - 100例:调整后的优势比为2.26;95%置信区间为1.60 - 3.20;101 - 200例:调整后的优势比为1.63;95%置信区间为1.23 - 2.16)与较少的并发症相关,而患者付费方,包括医疗保险(参照私人保险;调整后的优势比为1.86;95%置信区间为1.33 - 2.61)、医疗补助(调整后的优势比为1.63;95%置信区间为1.30 - 2.04)以及自费状态(调整后的优势比为2.41;95%置信区间为1.40 - 4.12),还有外科医生极低和低子宫切除量(参照≥21例;1 - 5例:调整后的优势比为1.73;95%置信区间为1.22 - 2.47;6 - 10例:调整后的优势比为1.60;95%置信区间为1.11 - 2.23)与围手术期并发症相关。
对于良性指征使用微创手术的情况仍然存在差异,大多数患者接受的是开放式、创伤更大的手术。年龄较大和黑人患者以及规模较小的医院与开放式子宫切除术相关。患者种族和付费方状态、子宫切除手术方式以及外科医生手术量与围手术期并发症相关。由高手术量外科医生或通过微创手术为良性指征实施的子宫切除术可能是减少可预防伤害的一个机会。