Suffering in Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Control Trial of a Narrative Intervention.

BACKGROUND

Advanced cancer can erode patients' wellbeing. Narrative interventions have improved patients' wellbeing, but might not be feasible for widespread implementation.

OBJECTIVES

(1) Test the effects of miLivingStory, a telephone-based life review and illness narrative intervention with online resources and social networking, on community-dwelling advanced cancer patients' wellbeing. (2) Explore intervention use and satisfaction.

PATIENTS AND SETTING

Stage III or IV cancer patients having completed initial therapy were randomized to miLivingStory or to an active control group, miOwnResources. Data and Analysis: Primary outcomes measured at baseline, two and four months included subscales for the FACIT-Sp peace and meaning and the POMS-SF depressed, anxious, and angry mood, scored on 0-4-point Likert scales. Linear mixed modeling, controlling for baseline primary outcome scores, tested for group comparisons of repeated outcome measures. Pairwise comparisons tested for within- and between-group differences. Intervention use and satisfaction data were collected automatically and by survey.

RESULTS

Eighty-six primarily white, female patients with high baseline wellbeing completed the study. There were no between-group differences at baseline or at two months. At four months, miLivingStory had a direct and positive effect for peace (2.86 vs. 2.57, p = 0.029), a trend effect for lower depressed mood (0.55 vs. 0.77, p = 0.097), and appeared to protect against the control group's declining wellbeing between two and four months. miLivingStory use was low and assessed as helpful to quite helpful.

CONCLUSIONS

Telephone-based narrative interventions hold promise in improving advanced cancer patients' wellbeing. Further testing of delivery and implementation strategies is warranted.