• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证和评估台湾地区中文版口腔健康素养成人问卷。

Validation and evaluation of the Mandarin version of the oral health literacy adult questionnaire in Taiwan.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

School of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Public Health Nurs. 2020 Mar;37(2):303-309. doi: 10.1111/phn.12688. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1111/phn.12688
PMID:31742791
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to translate the Oral Health Literacy Adult Questionnaire into a Mandarin version (MOHL-AQ) and to examine its psychometric properties.

METHODS

A methodological research using psychometric testing and evaluation of a translated instrument. A convenience sample of 402 participants from northern Taiwan were recruited for the validation of the MOHL-AQ. Internal consistency reliability, split-half reliability, inter-rater reliability, face validity, content validity, and construct validity were evaluated.

RESULTS

The value of internal consistency and split-half reliability of the MOHL-AQ were 0.77 and 0.78, respectively. Content validity reported a high content validity index (CVI = 95%). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and parallel analysis (PA) were used to determine a unidimensional model and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to confirm the model. The indices of good fit model were achieved at GFI = 0.93, AGFI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.04, CFI = 0.90, PGFI = 0.73, χ /df = 1.86 (p < .001). Most of the item-total correlations indicated adequate and acceptable convergent validity (r > .30).

CONCLUSION

MOHL-AQ demonstrates adequate psychometric properties for measuring the oral health literacy in Mandarin-speaking population. Public health nurses can use MOHL-AQ to assess oral health literacy in the community settings and further screen potential population with inadequate oral health literacy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在将《口腔健康素养成人问卷》(Oral Health Literacy Adult Questionnaire)译为简体中文版本(MOHL-AQ),并检验其心理测量学特性。

方法

采用心理测试法和翻译后评估的方法进行方法学研究。本研究在台湾北部地区采用便利抽样法招募了 402 名参与者,以验证 MOHL-AQ 的有效性。评估内容包括内部一致性信度、半分信度、评分者间信度、表面效度、内容效度和结构效度。

结果

MOHL-AQ 的内部一致性和半分信度值分别为 0.77 和 0.78。内容效度的内容效度指数(CVI)为 0.95%,表明内容效度较高。探索性因子分析(EFA)和并行分析(PA)用于确定单维模型,验证性因子分析(CFA)用于确认模型。良好拟合模型的指标在以下方面得到了实现:GFI=0.93,AGFI=0.92,RMSEA=0.04,CFI=0.90,PGFI=0.73,χ/df=1.86(p<0.001)。大多数项目总分相关性表明具有足够且可接受的聚合效度(r>0.30)。

结论

MOHL-AQ 具有足够的心理测量学特性,可用于测量普通话人群的口腔健康素养。公共卫生护士可以使用 MOHL-AQ 在社区环境中评估口腔健康素养,并进一步筛选出口腔健康素养不足的潜在人群。

相似文献

1
Validation and evaluation of the Mandarin version of the oral health literacy adult questionnaire in Taiwan.验证和评估台湾地区中文版口腔健康素养成人问卷。
Public Health Nurs. 2020 Mar;37(2):303-309. doi: 10.1111/phn.12688. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
2
Validation of the Brazilian Oral Health Literacy-Adults Questionnaire.巴西口腔健康素养-成人问卷的验证。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2022 Jul;6(3):e224-e231. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20220822-01. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
3
Development and validation of a short and easy-to-use instrument for measuring health literacy: the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults (HELIA).开发和验证一种简短易用的成人健康素养测量工具:成人健康素养量表(HELIA)。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 12;20(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08787-2.
4
Psychometric properties of the English version of the Oral Health Literacy Adults Questionnaire - OHL-AQ.《成人口腔健康素养问卷》英文版(OHL-AQ)的心理测量学特性。
Community Dent Health. 2016 Dec;33(4):274-280. doi: 10.1922/CDH_3868Flynn07.
5
The falls health literacy scale: translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Chinese version.跌倒健康素养量表:中文版的翻译、文化调适与验证。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):2329. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19784-0.
6
Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Oral Health Literacy Assessment in Spanish and development of a shortened form of the instrument.评估西班牙语版巴西口腔健康素养评估量表的心理测量特性,并开发该工具的简化形式。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 29;13(11):e0207989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207989. eCollection 2018.
7
A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: Development and psychometric evaluation.一个新的综合性糖尿病健康素养量表:编制与心理测量学评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
8
Decisional Balance Inventory (DBI) Adolescent Form for Smoking: Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version.吸烟决策平衡量表青少年版(DBI):波斯语版本的心理测量特性
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 25;17(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4425-2.
9
The transcultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Oral Health Literacy Scale for Diabetic Patients.《中文版糖尿病患者口腔健康素养量表的跨文化调适与验证》。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 7;24(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03965-9.
10
Psychometric properties of the chinese version of the value-based stigma inventory (VASI): a translation and validation study.基于价值的污名量表(VASI)中文版的心理计量学特性:翻译和验证研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05998-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Brazilian Oral Health Literacy-Adults Questionnaire.巴西口腔健康素养-成人问卷的验证。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2022 Jul;6(3):e224-e231. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20220822-01. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
2
Measuring health literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of instruments from 1993 to 2021.测量健康素养:1993 年至 2021 年工具的系统评价和文献计量分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 15;17(7):e0271524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271524. eCollection 2022.
3
Gender differences in the association between oral health literacy and oral health-related quality of life in older adults.
老年人中口腔健康素养与口腔健康相关生活质量之间的关联存在性别差异。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 May 25;22(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02237-8.
4
Easy to Read Health Education Material Improves Oral Health Literacy of Older Adults in Rural Community-Based Care Centers: A Quasi-Experimental Study.易读的健康教育材料提高农村社区护理中心老年人的口腔健康素养:一项准实验研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Oct 29;9(11):1465. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111465.