Labels of insecticides to which Oregon honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) hives could be exposed do not align with federal recommendations in their communication of acute and residual toxicity to honey bees.

BACKGROUND

Teaching pesticide applicators how to determine a product's toxicity to honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) by understanding the label is a way to reduce honey bee exposure to pesticides. Applicators are currently taught how to interpret labels that follow the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA's) recommendations for how this toxicity should be communicated. To effectively educate applicators, it must be determined if labels follow USEPA recommendations in how they communicate toxicity to honey bees, and if they do not, what patterns exist in these deviations from the recommendations (hereafter, deviations).

RESULTS

As a case study, we analyzed the USEPA master labels of insecticides used in 16 situations where there is concern over Oregon honey bee colony exposure to pesticides. Of the 232 labels analyzed, 31.5% deviated from USEPA recommendations in at least one way. Labels of both commercial and garden products deviated from USEPA recommendations. Products with labels that deviated from USEPA recommendations were found across application situation and active ingredient subgroup. The percentage of products per application situation and per chemical subgroup whose label deviated from USEPA recommendations varied. The most common deviation represented a direct contradiction between the statement used and the toxicity class of the product's active ingredient.

CONCLUSION

Applicators will be underprepared to interpret the pesticide labels they see in the field if they are exclusively taught how to interpret labels that follow USEPA recommendations. Applicators should be taught how to interpret a product label that uses non-USEPA-recommended statements to communicate toxicity to honey bees. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.