• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Study of the PneumRx Endobronchial Coil System versus Standard-of-Care Medical Management in the Treatment of Subjects with Severe Emphysema (ELEVATE).随机对照研究方案:PneumRx 支气管内线圈系统与标准医疗管理治疗严重肺气肿患者的对照(ELEVATE)。
Respiration. 2019;98(6):512-520. doi: 10.1159/000502100. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
2
Endobronchial Coil System versus Standard-of-Care Medical Management in the Treatment of Subjects with Severe Emphysema.支气管腔内线圈系统与标准医疗管理治疗严重肺气肿患者的比较。
Respiration. 2021;100(8):804-810. doi: 10.1159/000515744. Epub 2021 May 7.
3
Effect of Endobronchial Coils vs Usual Care on Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Severe Emphysema: The RENEW Randomized Clinical Trial.经支气管镜线圈置入与常规治疗对重度肺气肿患者运动耐量的影响:RENEW 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016;315(20):2178-89. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6261.
4
Predictors of Response to Endobronchial Coil Therapy in Patients With Advanced Emphysema.预测晚期肺气肿患者对支气管内线圈治疗反应的因素。
Chest. 2019 May;155(5):928-937. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
5
Lung Volume Reduction Coil Treatment vs Usual Care in Patients With Severe Emphysema: The REVOLENS Randomized Clinical Trial.肺减容线圈治疗与常规治疗对重度肺气肿患者的影响:REVOLENS 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jan 12;315(2):175-84. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.17821.
6
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction coil treatment of patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema.支气管镜肺减容线圈治疗严重非均质性肺气肿患者。
Chest. 2012 Sep;142(3):574-582. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0730.
7
Lung volume reduction coil treatment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with homogeneous emphysema: a prospective feasibility trial.慢性阻塞性肺疾病均匀性肺气肿患者的肺减容线圈治疗:一项前瞻性可行性试验。
Respiration. 2014;88(2):116-25. doi: 10.1159/000362522. Epub 2014 May 28.
8
The REACH Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Safety and Effectiveness of the Spiration® Valve System in the Treatment of Severe Emphysema.REACH 试验:一项评估 Spiration® Valve 系统治疗严重肺气肿的安全性和有效性的随机对照试验。
Respiration. 2019;97(5):416-427. doi: 10.1159/000494327. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
9
Evaluation of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction coil treatment results in patients with severe emphysema.重度肺气肿患者支气管镜下肺减容线圈治疗效果评估
Clin Respir J. 2017 Sep;11(5):585-592. doi: 10.1111/crj.12387. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
10
Endobronchial coils for the treatment of severe emphysema with hyperinflation (RESET): a randomised controlled trial.支气管腔内线圈治疗肺气肿伴过度充气(RESET):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2013 May;1(3):233-40. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70047-X. Epub 2013 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Bronchoscopic Management of COPD and Advances in Therapy.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的支气管镜管理与治疗进展
Life (Basel). 2023 Apr 18;13(4):1036. doi: 10.3390/life13041036.
2
Impact of prior smoking exposure and COPD comorbidity on treatment response to monoclonal antibodies in patients with severe asthma.既往吸烟暴露和慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并症对重度哮喘患者单克隆抗体治疗反应的影响。
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Aug 16;7(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00190-2021. eCollection 2021 Jul.
3
Airway granulation response to lung-implantable medical devices: a concise overview.气道植入医疗器械的肉芽反应:简要概述。
Eur Respir Rev. 2021 Aug 3;30(161). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0066-2021. Print 2021 Sep 30.
4
Endobronchial Coil System versus Standard-of-Care Medical Management in the Treatment of Subjects with Severe Emphysema.支气管腔内线圈系统与标准医疗管理治疗严重肺气肿患者的比较。
Respiration. 2021;100(8):804-810. doi: 10.1159/000515744. Epub 2021 May 7.
5
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction: status quo.支气管镜下肺减容术:现状
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Nov;8(21):1469. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1551.
6
Impacts of Coil Treatment on Anxiety and Depression in Emphysema.线圈治疗对肺气肿患者焦虑和抑郁的影响。
Can Respir J. 2020 May 11;2020:4270826. doi: 10.1155/2020/4270826. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of Quantitative Computed Tomographic Scan Analysis in Lung Volume Reduction for Emphysema.定量 CT 扫描分析在肺气肿肺减容术中的作用。
Respiration. 2019;98(1):86-94. doi: 10.1159/000498949. Epub 2019 May 8.
2
Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: An Expert Panel Recommendation - Update 2019.支气管镜肺减容术:专家小组建议-2019 年更新
Respiration. 2019;97(6):548-557. doi: 10.1159/000496122. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
3
Predictors of Response to Endobronchial Coil Therapy in Patients With Advanced Emphysema.预测晚期肺气肿患者对支气管内线圈治疗反应的因素。
Chest. 2019 May;155(5):928-937. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
4
Surgical and endoscopic interventions that reduce lung volume for emphysema: a systemic review and meta-analysis.外科和内镜介入减少肺气肿肺容积:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Apr;7(4):313-324. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30431-4. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
5
Surgical and endoscopic treatment for COPD: patients selection, techniques and results.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的外科手术和内镜治疗:患者选择、技术与结果
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Oct;10(Suppl 27):S3344-S3351. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.06.156.
6
Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction Treatment Using Endobronchial Valves for Emphysema: Emerging Questions.使用支气管内瓣膜进行支气管镜肺减容治疗肺气肿:新出现的问题。
Respiration. 2018;96(6):588-589. doi: 10.1159/000491675. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
7
Endobronchial Coils for Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: Best Practice Recommendations from an Expert Panel.支气管内线圈用于内镜肺减容术:专家小组的最佳实践建议。
Respiration. 2018;96(1):1-11. doi: 10.1159/000490193. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
8
Review of lung sealant technologies for lung volume reduction in pulmonary disease.用于肺部疾病肺减容的肺密封剂技术综述。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2018 Jun 27;11:225-231. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S127136. eCollection 2018.
9
Bronchoscopic Thermal Vapor Ablation: Best Practice Recommendations from an Expert Panel on Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction.支气管镜热蒸汽消融术:内镜肺减容术专家小组的最佳实践建议。
Respiration. 2018;95(6):392-400. doi: 10.1159/000489815. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
10
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Zephyr Endobronchial Valve Treatment in Heterogeneous Emphysema (LIBERATE).Zephyr 支气管内阀治疗异质性肺气肿的多中心随机对照试验(LIBERATE)。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Nov 1;198(9):1151-1164. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201803-0590OC.

随机对照研究方案:PneumRx 支气管内线圈系统与标准医疗管理治疗严重肺气肿患者的对照(ELEVATE)。

Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Study of the PneumRx Endobronchial Coil System versus Standard-of-Care Medical Management in the Treatment of Subjects with Severe Emphysema (ELEVATE).

机构信息

Thoraxklinik and Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Respiration. 2019;98(6):512-520. doi: 10.1159/000502100. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1159/000502100
PMID:31743933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6979432/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The PneumRx endobronchial coil system for patients with severe emphysema has been shown to improve quality of life, exercise capacity, and pulmonary function in patients with emphysema. A post hoc analysis of the RENEW trial has identified patient characteristics and lobar selection methods associated with improved outcomes, which have to be confirmed prospectively.

METHODS

The ELEVATE trial is a prospective, multicenter, open label, randomized (2:1), controlled trial comparing outcomes in patients treated with endobronchial coils (treatment) to a medically managed control group (control). The trial aims to enroll 210 patients (140 in the treatment group and 70 in the control group) with severe emphysema. Control patients will be eligible to crossover to coil treatment after 6 months of follow-up. The co-primary effectiveness endpoints are percent change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s and quality of life measured by change in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire from baseline to 6 months. Secondary objectives are determination of responder rates of clinical endpoints and mean change in other functional and physiologic endpoints. All patients will be followed for 24 months after initial treatment. Adverse events will be collected on an ongoing basis throughout the trial.

DISCUSSION

The primary objective of the ELEVATE trial is to prospectively confirm the safety and effectiveness profile of the coil system for the treatment of severe emphysema in consideration of the findings of previous randomized controlled trials. Secondary objectives are the determination of responder rates in all clinical endpoints and mean change in physiologic endpoints.

摘要

背景

对于严重肺气肿患者,PneumRx 支气管内线圈系统已被证明可改善肺气肿患者的生活质量、运动能力和肺功能。RENEW 试验的事后分析确定了与改善结果相关的患者特征和肺叶选择方法,这些方法需要前瞻性确认。

方法

ELEVATE 试验是一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、随机(2:1)、对照试验,比较了接受支气管内线圈(治疗)治疗的患者与接受药物治疗的对照组患者的结果。该试验旨在招募 210 名患有严重肺气肿的患者(治疗组 140 名,对照组 70 名)。对照组患者在随访 6 个月后有资格交叉接受线圈治疗。主要有效性终点是第 1 秒用力呼气量的百分比变化和圣乔治呼吸问卷的变化,从基线到 6 个月时的生活质量。次要目标是确定临床终点的应答率和其他功能和生理终点的平均变化。所有患者将在初始治疗后 24 个月内进行随访。将持续收集整个试验期间的不良事件。

讨论

ELEVATE 试验的主要目的是前瞻性确认线圈系统治疗严重肺气肿的安全性和有效性,考虑到之前随机对照试验的结果。次要目标是确定所有临床终点的应答率和生理终点的平均变化。