Suppr超能文献

随机对照研究方案:PneumRx 支气管内线圈系统与标准医疗管理治疗严重肺气肿患者的对照(ELEVATE)。

Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Study of the PneumRx Endobronchial Coil System versus Standard-of-Care Medical Management in the Treatment of Subjects with Severe Emphysema (ELEVATE).

机构信息

Thoraxklinik and Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Respiration. 2019;98(6):512-520. doi: 10.1159/000502100. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The PneumRx endobronchial coil system for patients with severe emphysema has been shown to improve quality of life, exercise capacity, and pulmonary function in patients with emphysema. A post hoc analysis of the RENEW trial has identified patient characteristics and lobar selection methods associated with improved outcomes, which have to be confirmed prospectively.

METHODS

The ELEVATE trial is a prospective, multicenter, open label, randomized (2:1), controlled trial comparing outcomes in patients treated with endobronchial coils (treatment) to a medically managed control group (control). The trial aims to enroll 210 patients (140 in the treatment group and 70 in the control group) with severe emphysema. Control patients will be eligible to crossover to coil treatment after 6 months of follow-up. The co-primary effectiveness endpoints are percent change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s and quality of life measured by change in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire from baseline to 6 months. Secondary objectives are determination of responder rates of clinical endpoints and mean change in other functional and physiologic endpoints. All patients will be followed for 24 months after initial treatment. Adverse events will be collected on an ongoing basis throughout the trial.

DISCUSSION

The primary objective of the ELEVATE trial is to prospectively confirm the safety and effectiveness profile of the coil system for the treatment of severe emphysema in consideration of the findings of previous randomized controlled trials. Secondary objectives are the determination of responder rates in all clinical endpoints and mean change in physiologic endpoints.

摘要

背景

对于严重肺气肿患者,PneumRx 支气管内线圈系统已被证明可改善肺气肿患者的生活质量、运动能力和肺功能。RENEW 试验的事后分析确定了与改善结果相关的患者特征和肺叶选择方法,这些方法需要前瞻性确认。

方法

ELEVATE 试验是一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、随机(2:1)、对照试验,比较了接受支气管内线圈(治疗)治疗的患者与接受药物治疗的对照组患者的结果。该试验旨在招募 210 名患有严重肺气肿的患者(治疗组 140 名,对照组 70 名)。对照组患者在随访 6 个月后有资格交叉接受线圈治疗。主要有效性终点是第 1 秒用力呼气量的百分比变化和圣乔治呼吸问卷的变化,从基线到 6 个月时的生活质量。次要目标是确定临床终点的应答率和其他功能和生理终点的平均变化。所有患者将在初始治疗后 24 个月内进行随访。将持续收集整个试验期间的不良事件。

讨论

ELEVATE 试验的主要目的是前瞻性确认线圈系统治疗严重肺气肿的安全性和有效性,考虑到之前随机对照试验的结果。次要目标是确定所有临床终点的应答率和生理终点的平均变化。

相似文献

4
Predictors of Response to Endobronchial Coil Therapy in Patients With Advanced Emphysema.
Chest. 2019 May;155(5):928-937. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
9
Evaluation of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction coil treatment results in patients with severe emphysema.
Clin Respir J. 2017 Sep;11(5):585-592. doi: 10.1111/crj.12387. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
10
Endobronchial coils for the treatment of severe emphysema with hyperinflation (RESET): a randomised controlled trial.
Lancet Respir Med. 2013 May;1(3):233-40. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70047-X. Epub 2013 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Bronchoscopic Management of COPD and Advances in Therapy.
Life (Basel). 2023 Apr 18;13(4):1036. doi: 10.3390/life13041036.
2
3
Airway granulation response to lung-implantable medical devices: a concise overview.
Eur Respir Rev. 2021 Aug 3;30(161). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0066-2021. Print 2021 Sep 30.
5
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction: status quo.
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Nov;8(21):1469. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1551.
6
Impacts of Coil Treatment on Anxiety and Depression in Emphysema.
Can Respir J. 2020 May 11;2020:4270826. doi: 10.1155/2020/4270826. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of Quantitative Computed Tomographic Scan Analysis in Lung Volume Reduction for Emphysema.
Respiration. 2019;98(1):86-94. doi: 10.1159/000498949. Epub 2019 May 8.
2
Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: An Expert Panel Recommendation - Update 2019.
Respiration. 2019;97(6):548-557. doi: 10.1159/000496122. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
3
Predictors of Response to Endobronchial Coil Therapy in Patients With Advanced Emphysema.
Chest. 2019 May;155(5):928-937. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
4
Surgical and endoscopic interventions that reduce lung volume for emphysema: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Apr;7(4):313-324. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30431-4. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
5
Surgical and endoscopic treatment for COPD: patients selection, techniques and results.
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Oct;10(Suppl 27):S3344-S3351. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.06.156.
6
Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction Treatment Using Endobronchial Valves for Emphysema: Emerging Questions.
Respiration. 2018;96(6):588-589. doi: 10.1159/000491675. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
8
Review of lung sealant technologies for lung volume reduction in pulmonary disease.
Med Devices (Auckl). 2018 Jun 27;11:225-231. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S127136. eCollection 2018.
10
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Zephyr Endobronchial Valve Treatment in Heterogeneous Emphysema (LIBERATE).
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Nov 1;198(9):1151-1164. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201803-0590OC.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验