• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估伦敦多地点医院网络中的数字脓毒症警报:使用电子健康记录数据的自然实验。

Evaluating a digital sepsis alert in a London multisite hospital network: a natural experiment using electronic health record data.

机构信息

Global Digital Health Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Infectious Diseases Section, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Feb 1;27(2):274-283. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz186.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocz186
PMID:31743934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7025344/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study sought to determine the impact of a digital sepsis alert on patient outcomes in a UK multisite hospital network.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A natural experiment utilizing the phased introduction (without randomization) of a digital sepsis alert into a multisite hospital network. Sepsis alerts were either visible to clinicians (patients in the intervention group) or running silently and not visible (the control group). Inverse probability of treatment-weighted multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of the intervention on individual patient outcomes.

OUTCOMES

In-hospital 30-day mortality (all inpatients), prolonged hospital stay (≥7 days) and timely antibiotics (≤60 minutes of the alert) for patients who alerted in the emergency department.

RESULTS

The introduction of the alert was associated with lower odds of death (odds ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.84; n = 21 183), lower odds of prolonged hospital stay ≥7 days (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.99; n = 9988), and in patients who required antibiotics, an increased odds of receiving timely antibiotics (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.57-1.87; n = 4622).

DISCUSSION

Current evidence that digital sepsis alerts are effective is mixed. In this large UK study, a digital sepsis alert has been shown to be associated with improved outcomes, including timely antibiotics. It is not known whether the presence of alerting is responsible for improved outcomes or whether the alert acted as a useful driver for quality improvement initiatives.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings strongly suggest that the introduction of a network-wide digital sepsis alert is associated with improvements in patient outcomes, demonstrating that digital based interventions can be successfully introduced and readily evaluated.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定英国多地点医院网络中数字脓毒症警报对患者结局的影响。

材料和方法

利用数字脓毒症警报在多地点医院网络中的分阶段引入(无随机分组)进行自然实验。脓毒症警报对临床医生可见(干预组患者)或无声运行且不可见(对照组)。采用逆概率治疗加权多变量逻辑回归估计干预对个体患者结局的影响。

结局

院内 30 天死亡率(所有住院患者)、延长住院时间(≥7 天)和急诊科发出警报的患者及时使用抗生素(≤60 分钟)。

结果

警报的引入与死亡率降低相关(比值比,0.76;95%置信区间 [CI],0.70-0.84;n=21183),延长住院时间≥7 天的几率降低(比值比,0.93;95% CI,0.88-0.99;n=9988),需要使用抗生素的患者及时使用抗生素的几率增加(比值比,1.71;95% CI,1.57-1.87;n=4622)。

讨论

目前数字脓毒症警报有效的证据不一。在这项英国的大型研究中,数字脓毒症警报与改善结局相关,包括及时使用抗生素。目前尚不清楚警报的存在是否导致了改善的结局,或者警报是否作为质量改进举措的有用驱动力。

结论

这些发现强烈表明,在整个网络范围内引入数字脓毒症警报与患者结局的改善相关,表明基于数字的干预措施可以成功引入并得到快速评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3b2/7025344/1365d6cb6d8c/ocz186f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3b2/7025344/e387cca565ed/ocz186f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3b2/7025344/7a3bb0b799ee/ocz186f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3b2/7025344/1365d6cb6d8c/ocz186f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3b2/7025344/e387cca565ed/ocz186f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3b2/7025344/7a3bb0b799ee/ocz186f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3b2/7025344/1365d6cb6d8c/ocz186f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating a digital sepsis alert in a London multisite hospital network: a natural experiment using electronic health record data.评估伦敦多地点医院网络中的数字脓毒症警报:使用电子健康记录数据的自然实验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Feb 1;27(2):274-283. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz186.
2
Impact of an emergency department electronic sepsis surveillance system on patient mortality and length of stay.急诊电子脓毒症监测系统对患者死亡率和住院时间的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 May 1;25(5):523-529. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx072.
3
Effect of an electronic medical record alert for severe sepsis among ED patients.电子病历警报对急诊科严重脓毒症患者的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;34(2):185-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
4
Effect of a Sepsis Screening Algorithm on Care of Children with False-Positive Sepsis Alerts.Sepsis 筛查算法对儿童假阳性 Sepsis 警报护理的影响。
J Pediatr. 2021 Apr;231:193-199.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.12.034. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
5
Does Use of Electronic Alerts for Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) to Identify Patients With Sepsis Improve Mortality?电子警报系统用于全身性炎症反应综合征 (SIRS) 以识别脓毒症患者是否能提高死亡率?
Am J Med. 2019 Jul;132(7):862-868. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.01.032. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
6
Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.与标准护理相比,自动监测用于危重症患者脓毒症的早期检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD012404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012404.pub2.
7
Triage sepsis alert and sepsis protocol lower times to fluids and antibiotics in the ED.急诊室的脓毒症分诊警报和脓毒症治疗方案缩短了给予液体和抗生素的时间。
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;34(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.08.039. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
8
Evaluation of an augmented emergency department electronic medical record-based sepsis alert.基于增强型急诊电子病历的脓毒症警报评估。
Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Oct;33(5):848-856. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13748. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
9
Digital innovation in healthcare: quantifying the impact of digital sepsis screening tools on patient outcomes-a multi-site natural experiment.医疗保健领域的数字创新:量化数字脓毒症筛查工具对患者预后的影响——一项多中心自然实验。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 Apr 27;32(1):e101141. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101141.
10
The impact of an electronic medical record surveillance program on outcomes for patients with sepsis.电子病历监测项目对脓毒症患者治疗结果的影响。
Heart Lung. 2014 Nov-Dec;43(6):546-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles carry microRNA-214-3p to target GSTZ1 to curb ferroptosis in lung epithelial cells during sepsis.脂肪来源的间充质干细胞衍生的细胞外囊泡携带微小RNA-214-3p靶向谷胱甘肽硫转移酶Z1,以抑制脓毒症期间肺上皮细胞的铁死亡。
Cytotechnology. 2025 Aug;77(4):132. doi: 10.1007/s10616-025-00793-9. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
2
Digital innovation in healthcare: quantifying the impact of digital sepsis screening tools on patient outcomes-a multi-site natural experiment.医疗保健领域的数字创新:量化数字脓毒症筛查工具对患者预后的影响——一项多中心自然实验。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 Apr 27;32(1):e101141. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101141.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Discharge to assess: transforming the discharge process of frail older patients.出院评估:转变体弱老年患者的出院流程
Future Hosp J. 2017 Feb;4(1):30-32. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.4-1-30.
2
Spreading and scaling up innovation and improvement.推广和扩大创新和改进。
BMJ. 2019 May 10;365:l2068. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2068.
3
To catch a killer: electronic sepsis alert tools reaching a fever pitch?追捕杀手:电子脓毒症警报工具正达到白热化程度?
The sepsis journey and where digital alerts can help: a qualitative, interview study with survivors and family members in England.
脓毒症的历程以及数字警报可发挥作用之处:一项对英国幸存者及其家属的定性访谈研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 26;13:1521761. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1521761. eCollection 2025.
4
Views and Uses of Sepsis Digital Alerts in National Health Service Trusts in England: Qualitative Study With Health Care Professionals.英格兰国民保健署信托机构中脓毒症数字警报的看法和用途:医护专业人员的定性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Oct 15;11:e56949. doi: 10.2196/56949.
5
Sepsis Alert Systems, Mortality, and Adherence in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.脓毒症预警系统对急诊科死亡率和依从性的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2422823. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.22823.
6
Personalization: a new political arithmetic?个性化:一种新的政治算术?
Distinktion. 2023 Jan 4;24(2):167-194. doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2022.2098352. eCollection 2023.
7
Information displays for automated surveillance algorithms of in-hospital patient deterioration: a scoping review.用于院内患者病情恶化的自动化监测算法的信息显示:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Dec 22;31(1):256-273. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad203.
8
Epic Sepsis Model Inpatient Predictive Analytic Tool: A Validation Study.重症脓毒症模型住院患者预测分析工具:一项验证研究。
Crit Care Explor. 2023 Jun 30;5(7):e0941. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000941. eCollection 2023 Jul.
9
Prevalence of electronic screening for sepsis in National Health Service acute hospitals in England.英格兰国民保健署急性医院中脓毒症电子筛查的流行情况。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 May;30(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100743.
10
Developing useful early warning and prognostic scores for COVID-19.为新型冠状病毒肺炎开发有用的早期预警和预后评分
Postgrad Med J. 2021 Aug 1;97(1150):477-480. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140086.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Sep;28(9):693-696. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009463. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
4
Electronic health record-based clinical decision support alert for severe sepsis: a randomised evaluation.基于电子健康记录的严重脓毒症临床决策支持警报:一项随机评估。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Sep;28(9):762-768. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008765. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
5
NHS hospitals could be fined if they miss new sepsis targets.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的医院若未达成分离性败血症新目标,可能会被罚款。
BMJ. 2019 Mar 12;364:l1124. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1124.
6
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Component Score Prediction of In-hospital Mortality From Sepsis.序贯器官衰竭评估组件评分预测脓毒症患者住院死亡率。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):810-817. doi: 10.1177/0885066618795400. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
7
Epidemiology and Costs of Sepsis in the United States-An Analysis Based on Timing of Diagnosis and Severity Level.美国脓毒症的流行病学和成本:基于诊断时间和严重程度级别的分析。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):1889-1897. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003342.
8
NEWS 2: an opportunity to standardise the management of deterioration and sepsis.新闻2:实现病情恶化和脓毒症管理标准化的契机。
BMJ. 2018 Mar 20;360:k1260. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1260.
9
qSOFA, SIRS and NEWS for predicting inhospital mortality and ICU admission in emergency admissions treated as sepsis.qSOFA、SIRS 和 NEWS 用于预测急诊治疗的疑似脓毒症患者的院内死亡率和 ICU 收治率。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jun;35(6):345-349. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207120. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
10
Emergency department sepsis screening tool decreases time to antibiotics in patients with sepsis.急诊脓毒症筛查工具可缩短脓毒症患者使用抗生素的时间。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;36(10):1745-1748. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.060. Epub 2018 Jan 31.