Department of Medicine - Biomedical Informatics Research, Hospital Medicine, and Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Sep;28(9):762-768. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008765. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
Sepsis remains the top cause of morbidity and mortality of hospitalised patients despite concerted efforts. Clinical decision support for sepsis has shown mixed results reflecting heterogeneous populations, methodologies and interventions.
To determine whether the addition of a real-time electronic health record (EHR)-based clinical decision support alert improves adherence to treatment guidelines and clinical outcomes in hospitalised patients with suspected severe sepsis.
Patient-level randomisation, single blinded.
Medical and surgical inpatient units of an academic, tertiary care medical centre.
1123 adults over the age of 18 admitted to inpatient wards (intensive care units (ICU) excluded) at an academic teaching hospital between November 2014 and March 2015.
Patients were randomised to either usual care or the addition of an EHR-generated alert in response to a set of modified severe sepsis criteria that included vital signs, laboratory values and physician orders.
There was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in primary outcome of the percentage of patients with new antibiotic orders at 3 hours after the alert (35% vs 37%, p=0.53). There was no difference in secondary outcomes of in-hospital mortality at 30 days, length of stay greater than 72 hours, rate of transfer to ICU within 48 hours of alert, or proportion of patients receiving at least 30 mL/kg of intravenous fluids.
An EHR-based severe sepsis alert did not result in a statistically significant improvement in several sepsis treatment performance measures.
尽管已经做出了协同努力,败血症仍然是住院患者发病率和死亡率的首要原因。败血症的临床决策支持已经显示出混合的结果,反映了不同的人群、方法和干预措施。
确定在疑似严重败血症的住院患者中,添加基于实时电子健康记录 (EHR) 的临床决策支持警报是否可以提高治疗指南的依从性和临床结果。
患者水平随机化,单盲。
学术、三级保健医疗中心的内科和外科住院病房。
2014 年 11 月至 2015 年 3 月期间,在一家学术教学医院的住院病房(不包括重症监护病房 (ICU))收治的 1123 名 18 岁以上的成年人。
患者被随机分配到常规护理组或 EHR 生成的警报组,以响应一组经过修改的严重败血症标准,其中包括生命体征、实验室值和医生医嘱。
在警报后 3 小时新抗生素医嘱的患者比例(35%比 37%,p=0.53)这一主要结局方面,干预组和对照组之间没有显著差异。次要结局,包括 30 天内院内死亡率、住院时间超过 72 小时、在警报后 48 小时内转至 ICU 的比率以及接受至少 30ml/kg 静脉补液的患者比例,两组之间也没有差异。
基于 EHR 的严重败血症警报并没有在几个败血症治疗效果指标上产生统计学上的显著改善。