Ningbo University Medical School, Ningbo, China.
Ningbo No. 6 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Feb;41(2):200-205. doi: 10.1177/1071100719891111. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a nonsurgical treatment for plantar fasciitis (PF) that has had satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, local corticosteroid injection (LCI) is often regarded as first-line treatment of PF, but there have been few studies comparing the 2 methods. Therefore, we compared the effect of ESWT and LCI on patients with PF.
This was a block randomized controlled study comparing 49 patients treated with ESWT and 47 patients treated with LCI from January 2017 to December 2018 who were followed for 6 months. We evaluated the clinical outcomes in the 2 groups, including average pain, first-step pain, plantar fascia thickness, and Foot Function Index, Chinese version of the PF patients.
All patients had pain relief and function improvement after treatment, whereas the LCI group did not maintain significant clinical improvement at the 3-month follow-up. The patients in the ESWT group had a significantly better clinical outcome with better duration of improvement than the LCI group.
For PF patients, both ESWT and LCI resulted in clinical improvement but EWST provided longer relief than LCI.
Level II, prospective comparative study.
体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)是一种治疗足底筋膜炎(PF)的非手术治疗方法,具有满意的临床疗效。然而,局部皮质类固醇注射(LCI)通常被认为是 PF 的一线治疗方法,但很少有研究比较这两种方法。因此,我们比较了 ESWT 和 LCI 对 PF 患者的疗效。
这是一项从 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月进行的、比较 49 例接受 ESWT 治疗和 47 例接受 LCI 治疗的患者的随机对照研究,随访时间为 6 个月。我们评估了两组患者的临床疗效,包括平均疼痛、第一步疼痛、足底筋膜厚度和足功能指数,足底筋膜炎患者的中文版。
所有患者在治疗后均有疼痛缓解和功能改善,而 LCI 组在 3 个月随访时并未保持显著的临床改善。ESWT 组的患者临床疗效明显优于 LCI 组,改善持续时间更长。
对于 PF 患者,ESWT 和 LCI 均能改善临床症状,但 ESWT 缓解疼痛的时间长于 LCI。
二级,前瞻性对比研究。