Suppr超能文献

抗血栓药物治疗患者行内镜下黏膜切除术时,黏膜下注射肾上腺素与高渗盐水的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。

Colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection with submucosal injection of epinephrine versus hypertonic saline in patients taking antithrombotic agents: propensity-score-matching analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.

Department of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov 19;19(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1114-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to remove colon polyps is increasingly common in patients taking antithrombotic agents. The safety of EMR with submucosal saline injection has not been clearly demonstrated in this population.

AIMS

The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of submucosal injection of saline-epinephrine versus hypertonic saline in colorectal EMR of patients taking antithrombotic agents.

METHODS

This study enrolled 204 patients taking antithrombotic agents among 995 consecutive patients who underwent colonic EMR from April 2012 to March 2018 at Ureshino Medical Center. Patients were divided into two groups according to the injected solution: saline-epinephrine or hypertonic (10%) saline (n = 102 in each group). Treatment outcomes and adverse events were evaluated in each group and risk factors for immediate and post-EMR bleeding were investigated.

RESULTS

There were no differences between groups in patient or polyp characteristics. The main antithrombotic agents were low-dose aspirin, warfarin, and clopidogrel. Propensity-score matching created 80 matched pairs. Adjusted comparisons between groups showed similar en bloc resection rates (95.1% with saline-epinephrine vs. 98.0% with hypertonic saline). There were no significant differences in adverse events (immediate EMR bleeding, post-EMR bleeding, perforation, or mortality) between groups. Multivariate analyses revealed that polyp size over 10 mm was associated with an increased risk of immediate EMR bleeding (odds ratio 12.1, 95% confidence interval 2.0-74.0; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Two tested solutions in colorectal EMR were considered to be both safe and effective in patients taking antithrombotic agents.

摘要

背景

在服用抗血栓药物的患者中,内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)切除结肠息肉越来越常见。在该人群中,黏膜下注射生理盐水进行 EMR 的安全性尚未得到明确证实。

目的

本研究旨在评估在服用抗血栓药物的患者中,与高渗盐水相比,黏膜下注射生理盐水-肾上腺素用于结直肠 EMR 的疗效和安全性。

方法

本研究纳入了 2012 年 4 月至 2018 年 3 月在 Ureshino 医疗中心接受结肠 EMR 的 995 例连续患者中的 204 例服用抗血栓药物的患者。根据注射溶液将患者分为两组:生理盐水-肾上腺素组(n = 102)和高渗(10%)盐水组(n = 102)。评估每组的治疗结果和不良事件,并探讨即时和 EMR 后出血的危险因素。

结果

两组患者或息肉特征无差异。主要抗血栓药物为低剂量阿司匹林、华法林和氯吡格雷。采用倾向评分匹配创建了 80 对匹配对。组间调整比较显示,整块切除率相似(生理盐水-肾上腺素组为 95.1%,高渗盐水组为 98.0%)。两组间不良事件(即时 EMR 出血、EMR 后出血、穿孔或死亡率)无显著差异。多变量分析显示,息肉直径>10mm 与即时 EMR 出血风险增加相关(优势比 12.1,95%置信区间 2.0-74.0;P = 0.001)。

结论

在服用抗血栓药物的患者中,两种测试溶液用于结直肠 EMR 均被认为是安全有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c9/6862827/8c17dc219c17/12876_2019_1114_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验