Department of Gastroenterology, Sage Medical Centre Koseikan, Saga, Japan.
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan.
Digestion. 2019;100(2):86-92. doi: 10.1159/000494455. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Colonic endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is safe for patients without antithrombotic therapy; however, EMR is associated with several risks. This study was performed to evaluate the risk of delayed hemorrhage in patients undergoing EMR without antithrombotic therapy.
In the present retrospective single-center study, 1,792 patients without antithrombotic therapy underwent colonic EMR from March 2012 to December 2016 at the Saga Medical Centre Koseikan. Risk factors were evaluated with respect to patient and lesion characteristics, the endoscopist's experience, and preventive hemoclips. Delayed hemorrhage was defined as bleeding for which emergency endoscopic hemostasis was applied >24 h after EMR.
Among the 1,792 patients, 1,660 with 3,844 tumors were evaluated. Delayed hemorrhage occurred in 43 patients (2.6%) and 46 polyps (1.2%). Preventive hemoclips were applied in 996 patients (60.0%). Univariate analysis indicated that delayed hemorrhage occurred more frequently in young patients (3-39 years, p < 0.001, 40-59 years, p = 0.005) compared to > 60 years and in association with large polyps (> 10 mm, p = 0.003), hemoclip (p = 0.019), and pedunculated polyps (p = 0.024). Multivariate analysis indicated that risk factors for hemorrhage were young age (age of 3-39 years p < 0.001, 40-59 years, p = 0.005) and large polyps (> 10 mm, p < 0.001). The risk of delayed hemorrhage was increased by an estimated 8% with a 1-mm increase in polyp size.
The present study suggests that young age (under 60 years old) and large polyp size are risk factors for causing delayed hemorrhage after colonic EMR in patients without antithrombotic therapy.
背景/目的:对于未接受抗血栓治疗的患者,结肠内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)是安全的;然而,EMR 存在多种风险。本研究旨在评估未接受抗血栓治疗的患者行 EMR 后发生延迟性出血的风险。
在本回顾性单中心研究中,2012 年 3 月至 2016 年 12 月,佐贺县医疗中心 Koseikan 对 1792 例未接受抗血栓治疗的患者行结肠 EMR。根据患者和病变特征、内镜医师经验和预防性止血夹的应用评估风险因素。将延迟性出血定义为 EMR 后>24 小时因出血而行紧急内镜止血。
在 1792 例患者中,有 1660 例患者的 3844 个肿瘤被评估。43 例(2.6%)和 46 个息肉(1.2%)出现延迟性出血。996 例(60.0%)患者应用预防性止血夹。单因素分析表明,与>60 岁患者相比,3-39 岁(p<0.001)和 40-59 岁(p=0.005)的患者更易发生延迟性出血,与大息肉(>10mm,p=0.003)、止血夹(p=0.019)和带蒂息肉(p=0.024)相关。多因素分析表明,出血的危险因素是年龄较轻(3-39 岁,p<0.001;40-59 岁,p=0.005)和息肉较大(>10mm,p<0.001)。息肉大小每增加 1mm,估计延迟性出血的风险增加 8%。
本研究表明,在未接受抗血栓治疗的患者中,年龄较轻(<60 岁)和息肉较大是 EMR 后发生延迟性出血的危险因素。