• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院血糖管理的最新进展。

Updates in Glycemic Management in the Hospital.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik, 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Curr Diab Rep. 2019 Nov 20;19(11):133. doi: 10.1007/s11892-019-1274-7.

DOI:10.1007/s11892-019-1274-7
PMID:31748830
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update of glycemic management during metabolic stress related to surgery or critical illness.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a clear association between severe hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and high glycemic variability and poor outcomes of postoperative or critically ill patients. However, the impressive beneficial effects of tight glycemic management (TGM) by intensive insulin therapy reported in one study were never reproduced. Hence, the recommendation of TGM is now replaced by more liberal blood glucose (BG) targets (< 180 mg/dL or 10 mM). Recent data support the concept of targeting individualized blood glucose (BG) values according to the presence of diabetes mellitus/chronic hyperglycemia, the presence of brain injury, and the time from injury. A more liberal glycemic management goal is currently advised during metabolic stress and could be switched to individualized glycemic management once validated by prospective trials.

摘要

目的综述

提供代谢应激期间血糖管理的最新信息,包括手术或危重病相关的血糖管理。

最新发现

严重高血糖、低血糖和高血糖变异性与术后或重症患者的不良结局密切相关。然而,强化胰岛素治疗的严格血糖管理(TGM)所带来的显著有益效果在一项研究中从未重现。因此,TGM 的推荐已被更宽松的血糖(BG)目标(<180mg/dL 或 10mM)所取代。最近的数据支持根据糖尿病/慢性高血糖的存在、脑损伤的存在以及损伤后的时间来确定个体化 BG 值的目标。目前建议在代谢应激期间采用更宽松的血糖管理目标,一旦前瞻性试验验证后,可切换至个体化血糖管理。

相似文献

1
Updates in Glycemic Management in the Hospital.医院血糖管理的最新进展。
Curr Diab Rep. 2019 Nov 20;19(11):133. doi: 10.1007/s11892-019-1274-7.
2
Liberal Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: An Exploratory Study.2型糖尿病重症患者的宽松血糖控制:一项探索性研究。
Crit Care Med. 2016 Sep;44(9):1695-703. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001815.
3
Insulin Therapy in Hospitalized Patients.住院患者的胰岛素治疗。
Am J Ther. 2020 Jan/Feb;27(1):e71-e78. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001078.
4
Reexamining the evidence for inpatient glucose control: new recommendations for glycemic targets.重新审视住院患者血糖控制的证据:新的血糖目标推荐。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010 Aug;67(16 Suppl 8):S3-8. doi: 10.2146/ajhp100171.
5
Understanding glycemic control in the critically ill: 2011 update.危重症患者的血糖控制:2011年更新版
Hosp Pract (1995). 2011 Apr;39(2):47-55. doi: 10.3810/hp.2011.04.394.
6
Risk of Hypoglycemia During Insulin Infusion Directed by Paper Protocol Versus Electronic Glycemic Management System in Critically Ill Patients at a Large Academic Medical Center.在一家大型学术医疗中心,针对重症患者,纸质方案指导的胰岛素输注与电子血糖管理系统指导的胰岛素输注过程中发生低血糖的风险。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):47-52. doi: 10.1177/1932296817747617. Epub 2017 Dec 17.
7
Management of tight intraoperative glycemic control during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in diabetic and nondiabetic patients.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中糖尿病和非糖尿病患者术中严格血糖控制的管理。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Dec;25(6):937-42. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.03.173. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
8
[The optimal blood glucose target in critically ill patient: comparison of two intensive insulin therapy protocols].[重症患者的最佳血糖目标:两种强化胰岛素治疗方案的比较]
Med Clin (Barc). 2014 Mar 4;142(5):192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2012.11.032. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
9
Glycemic control, mortality, and hypoglycemia in critically ill patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.危重症患者的血糖控制、死亡率和低血糖:随机对照试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jan;43(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4523-0. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
10
Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill hospitalized patients: making it safe and effective.危重症住院患者的强化胰岛素治疗:确保其安全有效。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 May 1;5(3):755-67. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500330.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between stress hyperglycemia and poor outcome in critically ill children is modulated by hyperlactatemia.危重症儿童应激性高血糖与不良预后之间的关联受高乳酸血症调节。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 18;16:1518746. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1518746. eCollection 2025.
2
Cardiologists vs Endocrinologists in Glycemic Control for Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.心脏病专家与内分泌专家对2型糖尿病冠状动脉疾病患者的血糖控制:一项横断面研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Dec 3;17:5715-5723. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S494004. eCollection 2024.
3
Association between stress hyperglycemia ratio and postoperative major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in noncardiac surgeries: a large perioperative cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of transcription factor 7-like 2 gene (TCF7L2) polymorphisms with stress-related hyperglycaemia (SRH) in intensive care and resulting outcomes: The READIAB study.转录因子 7 样蛋白 2 基因(TCF7L2)多态性与重症监护应激性高血糖(SRH)及其结局的相关性:READIAB 研究。
Diabetes Metab. 2020 Jun;46(3):243-247. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 20.
2
15. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: .医院中的糖尿病护理: 。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S173-S181. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S015.
3
Update on glucose in critical care.
应激性高血糖比值与非心脏手术术后主要心脑血管不良事件的关系:一项大型围手术期队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Nov 2;23(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02467-w.
4
Anti-Hyperglycemic Medication Management in the Perioperative Setting: A Review and Illustrative Case of an Adverse Effect of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist.围手术期的降糖药物管理:GLP-1受体激动剂不良反应的综述及实例分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 20;13(20):6259. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206259.
5
The relationship between hyperglycaemia on admission and patient outcome is modified by hyperlactatemia and diabetic status: a retrospective analysis of the eICU collaborative research database.入院时高血糖与患者预后的关系受高乳酸血症和糖尿病状态的影响:对 eICU 协作研究数据库的回顾性分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 21;13(1):15692. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43044-7.
6
Association of the time in targeted blood glucose range of 3.9-10 mmol/L with the mortality of critically ill patients with or without diabetes.血糖控制在3.9-10毫摩尔/升目标范围内的时间与有或无糖尿病重症患者死亡率的关联
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 11;9(3):e13662. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13662. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Association between dysglycemia and mortality by diabetes status and risk factors of dysglycemia in critically ill patients: a retrospective study.危重症患者血糖异常与糖尿病状态和血糖异常危险因素相关死亡率的关系:一项回顾性研究。
Acta Diabetol. 2022 Apr;59(4):461-470. doi: 10.1007/s00592-021-01818-3. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
危重病患者的葡萄糖管理进展。
Nutrition. 2019 Mar;59:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.06.027. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
4
Effects of perioperative tight glycemic control on postoperative outcomes: a meta-analysis.围手术期严格血糖控制对术后结局的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Endocr Connect. 2018 Dec 1;7(12):R316-R327. doi: 10.1530/EC-18-0231.
5
Postoperative tight glycemic control significantly reduces postoperative infection rates in patients undergoing surgery: a meta-analysis.术后严格血糖控制可显著降低手术患者的术后感染率:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2018 Jun 22;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12902-018-0268-9.
6
A Step Toward Personalized Glycemic Control.迈向个性化血糖控制的一步。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):1019-1020. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003107.
7
A systematic scoping review on the consequences of stress-related hyperglycaemia.应激相关高血糖后果的系统范围综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 6;13(4):e0194952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194952. eCollection 2018.
8
Perioperative management of adult diabetic patients. Review of hyperglycaemia: definitions and pathophysiology.成人糖尿病患者的围手术期管理。高血糖综述:定义和病理生理学。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018 Jun;37 Suppl 1:S5-S8. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.02.019. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
9
Early glycemia and mortality in critically ill septic patients: Interaction with insulin-treated diabetes.危重症脓毒症患者的早期血糖与死亡率:与胰岛素治疗糖尿病的相互作用。
J Crit Care. 2018 Jun;45:170-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
10
Meta-analysis of association between TCF7L2 polymorphism rs7903146 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.TCF7L2 多态性 rs7903146 与 2 型糖尿病关联的荟萃分析。
BMC Med Genet. 2018 Mar 7;19(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12881-018-0553-5.