Suppr超能文献

术后严格血糖控制可显著降低手术患者的术后感染率:一项荟萃分析。

Postoperative tight glycemic control significantly reduces postoperative infection rates in patients undergoing surgery: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wang Yuan-Yuan, Hu Shuang-Fei, Ying Hui-Min, Chen Long, Li Hui-Li, Tian Fang, Zhou Zhen-Feng

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Xixi Hospital of Hangzhou, Hangzhou, Hangzhou, 315000, Zhejiang Province, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medicine College), Hangzhou, 315000, China.

出版信息

BMC Endocr Disord. 2018 Jun 22;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12902-018-0268-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefit results of postoperative tight glycemic control (TGC) were controversial and there was a lack of well-powered studies that support current guideline recommendations.

METHODS

The EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched utilizing the key words "Blood Glucose", "insulin" and "Postoperative Period" to retrieve all randomized controlled trials evaluating the benefits of postoperative TGC as compared to conventional glycemic control (CGC) in patients undergoing surgery.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies involving 5053 patients were identified. As compared to CGC group, there were lower risks of total postoperative infection (9.4% vs. 15.8%; RR 0.586, 95% CI 0.504 to 0.680, p <  0.001) and wound infection (4.6% vs. 7.2%; RR 0.620, 95% CI 0.422 to 0.910, p = 0.015) in TGC group. TGC also showed a lower risk of postoperative short-term mortality (3.8% vs. 5.4%; RR 0.692, 95% CI 0.527 to 0.909, p = 0.008), but sensitivity analyses showed that the result was mainly influenced by one study. The patients in the TGC group experienced a significant higher rate of postoperative hypoglycemia (22.3% vs. 11.0%; RR 3.145, 95% CI 1.928 to 5.131, p <  0.001) and severe hypoglycemia (2.8% vs. 0.7%; RR 3.821, 95% CI 1.796 to 8.127, p <  0.001) as compared to CGC group. TGC showed less length of ICU stay (SMD, - 0.428 days; 95% CI, - 0.833 to - 0.022 days; p = 0.039). However, TGC showed a neutral effect on neurological dysfunction (1.1% vs. 2.4%; RR 0.499, 95% CI 0.219 to 1.137, p = 0.098), acute renal failure (3.3% vs. 5.4%, RR 0.610, 95% CI 0.359 to 1.038, p = 0.068), duration of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.201) and length of hospitalization (p = 0.082).

CONCLUSIONS

TGC immediately after surgery significantly reduces total postoperative infection rates and short-term mortality. However, it might limit conclusion regarding the efficacy of TGC for short-term mortality in sensitivity analyses. The patients in the TGC group experienced a significant higher rate of postoperative hypoglycemia. This study may suggest that TGC should be administrated under close glucose monitoring in patients undergoing surgery, especially in those with high postoperative infection risk.

摘要

背景

术后严格血糖控制(TGC)的获益结果存在争议,且缺乏有力的研究支持当前的指南推荐。

方法

利用关键词“血糖”“胰岛素”和“术后阶段”检索EMBASE、MEDLINE和Cochrane图书馆数据库,以检索所有评估术后TGC与传统血糖控制(CGC)相比对手术患者益处的随机对照试验。

结果

共纳入15项研究,涉及5053例患者。与CGC组相比,TGC组术后总感染风险较低(9.4% 对15.8%;RR 0.586,95%CI 0.504至0.680,p<0.001),伤口感染风险较低(4.6% 对7.2%;RR 0.620,95%CI 0.422至0.910,p = 0.015)。TGC组术后短期死亡率也较低(3.8% 对5.4%;RR 0.692,95%CI 0.527至0.909,p = 0.008),但敏感性分析显示该结果主要受一项研究影响。与CGC组相比,TGC组患者术后低血糖发生率显著更高(22.3% 对11.0%;RR 3.145,95%CI 1.928至5.131,p<0.001),严重低血糖发生率更高(2.8% 对0.7%;RR 3.821,95%CI 1.796至8.127,p<0.001)。TGC组的ICU住院时间更短(标准化均数差,-0.428天;95%CI,-0.833至-0.022天;p = 0.039)。然而,TGC对神经功能障碍(1.1% 对2.4%;RR 0.499,95%CI 0.219至1.137,p = 0.098)、急性肾衰竭(3.3% 对5.4%,RR 0.610,95%CI 0.359至1.038,p = 0.068)、机械通气时间(p = 0.201)和住院时间(p = 0.082)的影响呈中性。

结论

术后立即进行TGC可显著降低术后总感染率和短期死亡率。然而,在敏感性分析中,这可能会限制关于TGC对短期死亡率疗效的结论。TGC组患者术后低血糖发生率显著更高。本研究可能提示,对于手术患者,尤其是术后感染风险高的患者,应在密切血糖监测下进行TGC。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67da/6013895/e61faef7e488/12902_2018_268_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验